1 / 13

Overview of the MLC-3 Evaluation by Olympic Judges: Insights and Methodology

This document outlines the MLC-3 evaluation framework conducted by the Olympic judges, detailing the background, methodology, and major components of the project. From June 2008 to June 2011, the initiative aimed to enhance quality improvement (QI) methods and foster collaborations at both national and local levels. Key elements include annual surveys, case studies, and collaborative approaches to assess progress and engagement among health departments. The findings will be disseminated through reports and presentations, highlighting the importance of participant feedback in shaping future initiatives.

vinnie
Télécharger la présentation

Overview of the MLC-3 Evaluation by Olympic Judges: Insights and Methodology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Word from the Olympic Judges MLC-3 Evaluation Overview August 6, 2008 Brenda Joly Muskie School University of Southern Maine

  2. Overview • Background Information • Contract • Approach • Major Elements • Data collection efforts • Timeline • Dissemination of Findings

  3. Background Information • Contract with RWJ • June 15, 2008 – June 14, 2011 • Project Officer: Brenda Henry, PhD, MPH • MLC-2 and MLC-3 evaluation efforts • Approach • External evaluators • Participatory • Rigorous yet flexible

  4. Major Elements Three Focus Areas: 1. Goals of initiative • Prepared for and contributed to national accreditation program • Promote application of QI methods 2. Quality improvement • Adoption, reach and impact 3. Collaborative approach • National and local collaboratives

  5. Data Collection • Annual Survey • Case Studies • Collaborative Survey • Key Informant Interviews • Monitoring Tools • Feedback Forms

  6. Annual Survey • Purpose: • To assess goals of initiative & QI capacity, adoption and reach in MLC-3 states • Administered to: • All health departments in MLC-3 states • Timeline: • Administered annually • Scheduled for Nov-Dec, 2008

  7. Case Studies • Purpose: • To assess efforts of Mini-Collaboratives in four of ten target areas • Participating Sites: • 12 case studies in four target areas • Timeline: • Scheduled to begin in winter, 2009

  8. Collaborative Survey • Purpose: • To assess MLC-3 participant perceptions about the success of the Collaborative • Administered to: • Representatives from MLC-3 states • Partner agencies • Timeline: • Year three

  9. Key Informant Interviews • Purpose: • To assess perceptions about the National and Local Collaboratives • Administered to: • Representatives from MLC-3 states • Partner agencies, consultants, funders • Timeline: • National: Annually, in spring • Local: Coincide with case studies

  10. Process Tools • Feedback Forms and Monitoring Tools • Under development • To explore: • Implementation of efforts • Information exchange • Organization of the Mini-Collaboratives • Resources and supports needed

  11. Your Participation & Help • We encourage you to: • Participate • Share your input • Ask questions • We need your help to: • Identify appropriate distribution list for annual survey • Encourage participation

  12. Dissemination • Plans: • Annual report • Annual case study profiles • Presentations • Work with communication staff at RWJ

  13. Questions?

More Related