1 / 7

JLIP status for certification

JLIP status for certification. Daniel Bloch, Benoit Clément, Denis Gelé, Sébastien Greder, Isabelle Ripp-Baudot (IReS Strasbourg). D0 note available estimate of b-tagging efficiency : 5 methods used . light-tagging efficiency : 2 methods used All very consistent !

virgo
Télécharger la présentation

JLIP status for certification

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JLIP status for certification Daniel Bloch, Benoit Clément, Denis Gelé, Sébastien Greder, Isabelle Ripp-Baudot (IReS Strasbourg) D0 note available estimate of b-tagging efficiency : 5 methods used . light-tagging efficiency : 2 methods used All very consistent ! For JLIP cut < 1%: (b-tag) = 352(stat+syst)%, . (light-tag) = 1.10.1(stat+syst)% D. Bloch (IReS Strasbourg)

  2. Rejection of Kº and  Use SVT tools Reject K° if 0.47m()0.52 GeV and  if 1.10m(p)1.13 GeV D. Bloch (IReS Strasbourg)

  3. Taggability Require  2 tracks with pT>0.5 GeV among 5 categories : 6 CFT 3 SMT 7 CFT 1 SMT 7 CFT 2 SMT 7 CFT 3 SMT 7 CFT 4 SMT MC data Taggability = 71% in data . = 85% in QCD MC (Et(jet) > 60GeV) D. Bloch (IReS Strasbourg)

  4. Track multiplicity in jet • first four categories: in data : 2.8 (Et<60) – 3.5 (Et>60) in MC : 2.5 ( " ) - 3.5 ( "   ) • tracks with  7 CFT and 4 SMT: in data : 1.5 (Et<60) – 1.9 (Et>60) in MC : 3.1 ( " ) - 4.2 ( " ) in MCreject : 55% of tracks with 7 CFT and 4 SMT at random D. Bloch (IReS Strasbourg)

  5. JLIP performance in MC all tracks . Fb = 0.67 MC scale factor Fb = (b,data)/(b,MC) b - tag with rejection Fb=0.85 c - tag D. Bloch (IReS Strasbourg)

  6. JLIP performance in data vary the JLIP cut <0.1%, <0.5%, <1%, <2% Very good agreement between data and MC ! D. Bloch (IReS Strasbourg)

  7. Code location • on krutenau-clued0:/disk2/work/greder/jlip-code/ • strasbourg-analyze_v00.00.01.tar.gz  a general independent framework to perform physics analysis see heppackage/doc/README.txt • JLIP_d0framework.tar.gz  JLIP macro to run in the D0 framework see README.txt where example for implementation is provided D. Bloch (IReS Strasbourg)

More Related