1 / 29

Klaus P. Jungmann, Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut, Groningen, NL

The Muon g-2 Experiment. Klaus P. Jungmann, Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut, Groningen, NL on behalf of the muon g-2 collaboration. I nternational C onference on L inear C olliders 04 :  19-23 April 2004 - "Le Carré des Sciences", Paris, France. Standard Model Precision Experiment

vivi
Télécharger la présentation

Klaus P. Jungmann, Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut, Groningen, NL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Muon g-2 Experiment Klaus P. Jungmann, Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut, Groningen, NL on behalf of the muon g-2 collaboration International Conference on Linear Colliders 04 :  19-23 April 2004 - "Le Carré des Sciences", Paris, France Standard Model Precision Experiment Fundamental Constants Related Experiments Interpretation

  2. QED - Contributions: am(QED) = 116 584 705.6(2.9) * 10-11(Kinoshita 2000) Weak Interaction Corrections: m m m m m m Dam(weak) = 151(4) * 10-11(Kutho 1992, Degrassi 1998)

  3. ! ! Hadronic Corrections for gm-2 Dam(hadr.,1st order) = 6951(75)*10-11 (Davier, 1998) Dam(hadr., higherorder) = -101(6) *10-11 (Krause, 1996) Dam(hadr., light on light) = -79(15) *10-11 (Hayakawa, 1998) Situation Spring 2001

  4. Early “Shopping List”

  5. Trolley NMR Probes NMR Trolley Fixed NMR Probes Electrostatic Quadrupole Electrodes Trolley Rails Vacuum Vessel

  6. 900 000 000 positrons with E > 2GeV in 1999

  7. Fourier Spectra for different Run Conditions m- @BNL

  8. Systematic Uncertainties, Results Magnetic Field • wp,0 spherical probe 0.05 ppm • wp(R,ti) 17 trolley probes 0.09 ppm • wp(R,t) 150 fixed probes 0.07 ppm • wp(R) trolley measurement 0.05 ppm • < wp> muon distribution 0.03 ppm • wp (RI) others 0.10 ppm total systematic uncertainty dwp=0.17ppm Spin Precession • Pileup 0.08 ppm • Lost muons 0.09 ppm • Coherent Betatron Oscillations 0.07 ppm • Gain Instability 0.12 ppm • others 0.11 ppm total systematic uncertainty dwa,sy = 0.21 ppm total statistical uncertainty dwa,st = 0.6 ppm wp/2p = 61 791 400 (11) Hz wa/2p = 229 073.59(15)(5) Hz

  9. Theory: * need a for muon ! * hadronic and weak corrections *various experimental sources of a<better 100ppb>need constants at very moderate *a no concern for (g-2)maccuracy wa wammc Experiment: wp = am = mm wa emB - wp mp * wa and B (wp) measured in (g-2)m experiment <better 0.35 and 0.1 ppm> * c is a defined quantity <“infinite” accuracy> *mm (mm) is measured in muonium spectroscopy (hfs) <better 120 ppb> NEW 1999 *em is measured in muonium spectroscopy (1s -2s) <better 1.2 ppb> NEW 1999 *mp in water known >> probe shape dependence<< <better 26 ppb> *m3He to mp in water >> gas has no shape effect << <better 4.5 ppb> being improved

  10. Final results from Experiment E821 @BNL

  11. ! ! Hadronic Corrections for gm-2 Dam(hadr.,1st order) = 6951(75)*10-11 (Davier, 1998) Dam(hadr., higherorder) = -101(6) *10-11 (Krause, 1996) Dam(hadr., light on light) = -79(15) *10-11 (Hayakawa, 1998)

  12. The Muon g-2 Experiment Klaus P. Jungmann, Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut, Groningen, NL on behalf of the muon g-2 collaboration International Conference on Linear Colliders 04 :  19-23 April 2004 - "Le Carré des Sciences", Paris, France What next in Experiment? - Just run again ? - Is there more to it ? Standard Model Precision Experiment Fundamental Constants Related Experiments Interpretation How reliable is Theory ? What mean Speculations built on whishfull definition of Theory Value? What about Theory ? Are there other Experiments Neede to come further in Physics?

  13. [ ]

  14. EDM closely related to non standard anomaly in many models! Exploit huge motional electric fields for relativistic particles in high magnetic fields; observe spin rotation Concept works also for (certain) nuclei; Deuteron particularly interesting

More Related