1 / 13

Compromises over Slavery

Compromises over Slavery. Aim: Why did compromise fail to solve the issue of slavery in the United States?. National Unity or Sectionalism?.

vthompson
Télécharger la présentation

Compromises over Slavery

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Compromises over Slavery Aim: Why did compromise fail to solve the issue of slavery in the United States?

  2. National Unity or Sectionalism? John C. Calhoun: "The South asks for justice, simple justice, and less she ought not to take. She has no compromise to offer but the Constitution and no concession or surrender to make.” Daniel Webster: "I wish to speak today, not as a Massachusetts man, not as a northern man, but as an American.... I speak today for the preservation of the Union. Hear me for my cause.” Henry Clay: "I know no South, no North, no East, no West to which I owe any allegiance."

  3. Classwork • Read and analyze the documents. • Underline important text. • Answer the following questions: • Is this a primary or secondary source? • What is the main idea of the reading? • What effect did this event have on slavery in the United States? • Summary Question: Was the federal government successful in dealing with the question of slavery in America?

  4. I. US Constitution • At the Constitutional Convention, what compromises did the framers make regarding slavery? • 3/5 Compromise • Slave Trade Compromise

  5. II. Missouri Compromise

  6. Missouri Compromise (1820) • 1819, Missouri applied for statehood • Politicians disagreed about whether it would be a slave state or free state • Northerners vs. Southerners • Missouri Compromise • Missouri would allow slavery • Maine would enter union as free state (no slavery) • 36º30’N latitude would separate Free States from Slave States in the Louisiana Territory

  7. III. Compromise of 1850

  8. Compromise of 1850

  9. Compromise of 1850 • California = free state • Utah and New Mexico territories allowed popular sovereignty: citizens of territories decided for themselves whether to have slavery • Slave trade, but not slavery itself, abolished in Washington, D.C. • Strong federal enforcement of new Fugitive Slave Act (VERY CONTROVERSIAL)

  10. Compromise of 1850 • 1. California = free state • 2. Popular sovereignty in Utah and New Mexico territories • 4. Slave trade, but not slavery itself, abolished in Washington, D.C. • 5. Strong federal enforcement of new Fugitive Slave Act (VERY CONTROVERSIAL)

  11. IV. Kansas Nebraska Act

  12. The Kansas-Nebraska Act A. Popular Sovereignty in these territories 1. Repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820 2. Many Northerners were outraged B. “Bleeding Kansas” 1. violent conflict broke out between pro- and anti-slavery factions C. Republican Party forms 1. Opposed expansion of slavery 2. Abraham Lincoln

More Related