1 / 1

“Regimes” of Continental Single Layer Liquid Water Clouds

“Regimes” of Continental Single Layer Liquid Water Clouds. Löhnert 1 , U ., J. Schween 1 , K. Ebell 1 , C. Acquistapace 1 , S . Crewell 1 , Anne Hirsikko 2 , Birger Bohn 2 1 Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, 2 Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH.

warren
Télécharger la présentation

“Regimes” of Continental Single Layer Liquid Water Clouds

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. “Regimes” of Continental Single Layer Liquid Water Clouds Löhnert1, U., J. Schween1, K. Ebell1, C. Acquistapace1, S. Crewell1, Anne Hirsikko2, Birger Bohn2 1Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, 2Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Single Layer Liquid Water Clouds Measurement Synopsis Liquid Water Cloud “Regimes” cloud base (diamonds) based on ceilometer backscatter • Under which conditions do they exist? • How do BL-dynamics, cloud microphysics and thermodynamics interact? • Crucial for improving the representation of cloud and cloud feedbacks in weather and climate models based on one year of JOYCE data (03/2012 – 02/2013) Skewness(w) on 5 min resolution, 30 min average negativeskewness(w): downdraft plumes (LW cloud top cooling) Regime 2 (18%): “coupled” to surface positiveskewness(w): updraft plumes (surface driven) Microwave radiometer • Observations @ JOYCE: • Cloud boundaries (Cloudnet) • Vertical wind speed (w) • Mixing layer height (MLH) • Liquid Water Path (LWP) • Integrated Water Vapor (IWV) IWV Doppler Lidar Cloud radar Regime 3 (26%) MLH (crosses) based on threshold of variance(w) Ceilometer LWP Regime 1 (54%): “de-coupled” • Jülich ObservatorYfor Cloud Evolution Regimes: Skewness Regimes: LWP Dilution Factor (DF) Regimes: IWV Variability Regime 1: Skewness @ cloud base from Doppler Lidar > 78% of Regime 1 clouds characterized by negative skewness, i.e. “downdraft plumes” driven by long-wave cloud top cooling  “decoupled” 30-min IWV standard deviation from microwave radiometer around Doppler lidar measurement Regime 1 Regime 2: Skewnessbetween cloud base and surface ~80% of Regime 2 clouds characterized by positive skewness, i.e. “updraft plumes” driven diabaticheating from the surface  “surface coupled” • LWP from microwave radiometer • LWPadiab from Cloudnet cloud boundares and temperature Regime 2 clouds (coupled) show higher IWV variability than Regime 1 clouds (de-coupled) due to BL mixing Regime 2 ~dry air entrainment only slightly higher dilution in Regime 2 (coupled) clouds 14th Conference on Cloud Physics 7-11 July 2014, Westin Copley Place, Boston, MA, USA

More Related