SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

wilton avatar
27 diapositives · 465 Views · Aug 09, 2014

Alternative Project Delivery Methods/Financing Florida Utility Coordinating Committee February 7, 2008. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Brian Blanchard, P.E. Director, Office of Construction. Public Private Partnership (PPP) Toll Facilities Developer Driven With a JPA With a Permit

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - slide 1
01 / 27FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Alternative Project Delivery Methods/FinancingFlorida Utility Coordinating Committee February 7, 2008 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Brian Blanchard, P.E. Director, Office of Construction

  2. Public Private Partnership (PPP) Toll Facilities Developer Driven With a JPA With a Permit Design-Build Design-Build-Finance LAP Projects (on/off system) JPA with City/County Trip Projects Types of Contracts

  3. Public Private Partnerships (S 334.30) Solicited To advance projects in 5 year work program To use private tolls to add capacity Unsolicited Alternative Contracting

  4. Primary Focus on New Capacity Each Project is Unique Get Environmental Work Clear or Almost Clear Develop Solid, Transparent, and Competitive PPP Process Florida’s Current PPP Approach

  5. Congestion in 2005

  6. Congestion in 2025

  7. New expressways likely to be financed through tolling: Demonstrated willingness to accept/use toll facilities in most major urban areas Examine and consider all possibilities including PPPs and existing models for tolling PPPs may offer advantages to advance expressways forward Tolling and PPPs

  8. Port of Miami Tunnel - $1B First Coast Outer Beltway - $1.8B I-595 Improvements/Express Lanes - $1.5B Tampa Interstate System (I4/Selmon) - $660M Design-Bid-Build-Finance PPP Examples

  9. Tunnel under main channel of Government Cut Roadway work on Dodge and Watson Islands MacArthur Causeway Bridge widening Port Access: Project Construction

  10. First Coast Outer Beltway • Proposed tolled expressway - $1.8B • Connects 1-10 to I-95 through Duval, St. Johns, and Clay counties • Will provide significant congestion relief to Jacksonville metro area

  11. Reconstruction/widening of I-595 mainline and improvements to adjacent cross-roads/frontage roads/ ramps) from I-75/Sawgrass Expressway interchange to I-595/I-95 interchange, and Tolled Express Lanes - 10.5 miles - $1.5B I-595 in Ft. Lauderdale

  12. Tampa Interstate System (I-4/Selmon)

  13. Construction Projects

  14. 2 Lane Safety Project • One lane Northbound and One lane Southbound • 14’ Median with a Concrete Median Barrier and 6’ Inside Shoulders • 10’ Southbound Shoulder, 6’ Paved • 12’ Northbound Shoulder, 10’ Paved

  15. I-75 Design-Build-FinanceFt. Myers-Naples35 Milesof 6-Laning

  16. The “Sunshine State” is a good business climate for PPPs There will be different flavors of PPPs that should peak varied interest Florida DOT is working hard to provide a solid, transparent, and competitive PPP process PPPs will mostly be large projects PPP Summary

  17. Design-Build

  18. Projects 100M or greater will be Design-Build Why? Allows for scope adjustments Establish maximum budget amount (MBA) Select based on scope, qualifications, quality, schedule, cost (not exceed MBA) A+B/T.P. Score Use of Bid Options Cost Increases!! Lesson Learned: How to keep Commitments

  19. Developer Driven With a JPA With a Permit LAP Projects (on/off system) JPA with City/County Trip Projects Types of Contracts

  20. Who is responsible for utility coordination? When is it reimbursable? How will reimbursement be handled? What is the funding for each type? How can utility best interests be represented? Who is Responsible for Utility Coordination

  21. Stakeholder Concerns • Not actively involved in planning stages • Limited resources • Difficult to coordinate with 3 or 4 Pre-Bid teams with different designs • Information available lacks detail and accuracy • Schedule for relocation is “too” short

  22. Owner Suggestions • Over time, place more emphasis on past performance grading • Set clear guidelines for D/B Projects and include utilities - More detail and early coordination prior to RFP can reduce “risk based costing” by D/B Team • Clearly define contract roles - This is critical • Use the D/B agreement to clarify the relocation process and reimbursement procedures (available from FDOT)

  23. Owner Suggestions • Give PROPER Attention to the Utilities • This should vary with each project • Allow appropriate time frames for utility procurement and relocations in the schedule • Carefully consider utility issues, complexity, and responsibilities during the selection process of of P3 or D/B Projects • Utilities need to be available during design to provide input and offer suggestions/solutions

  24. Yesterday Ending Last Night Life is not a snapshot. It would be wonderful if, at the pinnacle of your success, you could take a picture of it and assume nothing will ever change. But it will change, and if you don't change with it, what got you there yesterday won't keep you there in the future. Dr. John Maxwell

  25. Questions?