1 / 17

Thermal transport in partially unzipped CNTs

Thermal transport in partially unzipped CNTs. Xiaobin Chen Tsinghua University. 2010.7.8 TIENCS workshop NUS , Singapore. OUTLINE. Background Model Results Discussion Conclusion. Background. Tour, Nature (2009). Vega-Cantu, Nano Lett (2009). Narrow ribbons.

xander
Télécharger la présentation

Thermal transport in partially unzipped CNTs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Thermal transport inpartially unzipped CNTs Xiaobin Chen Tsinghua University 2010.7.8 TIENCS workshop NUS , Singapore

  2. OUTLINE • Background • Model • Results • Discussion • Conclusion

  3. Background Tour, Nature (2009) Vega-Cantu, Nano Lett (2009) • Narrow ribbons. • High yields • High quality • Controllable width, edge structures, placement and alignment. HJ Dai, Nature (2009)

  4. Potential application Brey, PRL (2009) B Huang, JACS (2009) B Wang, PRB (2010)

  5. CNTs—High thermal conductivity S. Berber, 2000 B. Li, 2005 Kim, 2001, MWCNT 6600 M. A. Osman, 2001 H. Dai, 2006 J. Che, 2000 M. Alaghemandi, 2009 Can a partially unzipped CNT preserve high thermal conductivity?

  6. Simplifications • Phonons’ contribution • Harmonic system • No edge-saturation

  7. Model and Method PUCNT Npu L R 1 2 3 4 • • • N Green’s function (harmonic system): Project the influences of contacts into center: Transmissionfunction

  8. Model and Method Landauer Formula:

  9. Results pu15-(6,6) CNT • s < sideal. • s ↓ as Npu ↑. • X(w) decreases a lot except for 0 ~ 300 cm-1.

  10. Transmission function • X(w) < XACNT_ideal (w) • Npu↑, X(w) ↓ and finally X(w) < XZGNR (w)

  11. Length puN-(6,6) CNT s0= sAGNR(T) • s changes little at low T. • s is reduced much more at high T. • At 300K, unzipped 50 cells, s  (2/3)s0. Lpu50  12.3 nm. • s changes exponentially with Lpu.

  12. Radius pu12-(N,N) CNT • Linear dependence at 300 K • Dsdecrease: independent of circumference.

  13. DISCUSSION

  14. 1. Half unzipped CNTs (n,n) CNT-2nZGNR junction (10,10) CNT/20ZGNR single junction Comparing to those of PUCNTs. • s n  C , but a little superlinear • s0-s increases as C gets larger. (10,10) CNT/25-UZGNR /(10,10) CNT double junction

  15. 2. Partially open superlattice • (6,6) CNT • 16 cells per supercell 8 cells with 4 dimmer lines removed. • Note: (6,6)CNT-8ZGNR in a supercell • s decreases by 76.5%. • Reasons: • Cutting makes the narrow parts narrower. • More interfaces.

  16. Conclusion • Thermal conductance of partially unzipped carbon nanotubes is reduced due to the unzipped part, but is nearly independent of the nanotube’s size. • What's more, the decrease shows an exponential dependence on the length of the unzipped part. • At room temperature, the decrease caused by an unzipped part is about 1 nW/K.

  17. Thanks for your attention! Acknowledgements • Many thanks to • Prof. Duan • Dr. Yong Xu

More Related