1.55k likes | 1.8k Vues
LUNG TRANSPLANTATION. Adult Recipients. 2019. citation. Table of Contents. Donor, recipient and center characteristics: slides 3-11 Post-transplant survival and rejection: slides 12-30 Functional and employment status and rehospitalization post transplant: slides 31-36
E N D
LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Adult Recipients 2019 citation
Table of Contents • Donor, recipient and center characteristics: slides 3-11 • Post-transplant survival and rejection: slides 12-30 • Functional and employment status and rehospitalization post transplant: slides 31-36 • Induction and maintenance immunosuppression: slides 37-51 • Post transplant morbidities: slides 52-69 • Multivariable analyses: slides 70-86 • Focus theme - Size mismatch: slides 87-151 • Select characteristics by size mismatch: slides 88-103 • Post-transplant survival: slides 104-124 • Multivariable analyses: slides 125-151 2019 citation
Donor, Recipient and Center Characteristics 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsNumber of Transplants by Year and Procedure Type NOTE: This figure includes only the adult lung transplants that are reported to the ISHLT Transplant Registry. As such, this should not be construed as representing changes in the number of adult lung transplants performed worldwide. 2019 citation
Adult Lung Transplants Average Center Volume by Location (Transplants: January 2010 – June 2018) 2019 citation
Adult Lung Transplants Diagnoses (Transplants: January 1995 – June 2018) 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsProcedure Type within Diagnosis by Transplant Year 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsMajor Diagnoses by Year (%) 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsMajor Diagnoses by Year (Number) 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsDiagnosis Distribution by Location (Transplants: January 2005 – June 2018) 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsDiagnosis Distribution by Location and Era (Transplants: January 2005 – June 2018) 2019 citation
Post-Transplant Survival and Rejection 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Procedure Type for Primary Transplant Recipients (Transplants: January 1992 – June 2017) Median survival (years): Double Lung = 7.8; Conditional = 10.2 Single Lung = 4.8; Conditional = 6.5 p<0.0001 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Era (Transplants: January 1992 – June 2017) Median survival (years): 1992-2001: 4.7; Conditional=7.5; 2002-2009: 6.5; Conditional=8.8; 2010-6/2017: 6.7; Conditional=NA 1992-2001 vs. 2002-2009: p<0.0001 1992-2001 vs. 2010-6/2017: p<0.0001 2002-2009 vs. 2010-6/2017: p<0.0001 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival Conditional on Survival to 1 Yearby Era and Transplant Type (Transplants: January 1992 – June 2017) No pairwise comparisons between transplant types within each era and between eras within each transplant type were significant at p < 0.05 except for 2002-2009: Primary vs. Retx 2010-6/2017: Primary vs. Retx Primary: 1992-2001 vs. 2002-2009 Primary: 1992-2001 vs. 2010-6/2017 Median survival (years): Primary: 1992-2001 = 7.5; 2002-2009 = 8.9; 2010-6/2017 = NA; Retx: 1992-2001 = 7.0; 2002-2009 = 6.9; 2010-6/2017 = 6.2 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Sex (Transplants: January 1992 – June 2017) p<0.0001 Median survival (years): Male=5.9; Female=6.6 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Transplant Type and Sex (Transplants: January 1992 – June 2017) All pairwise comparisons were significant at p < 0.05 except Retx: Male vs. Female. Median survival (years): Primary: Male=6.0, Female=6.7; First Retx: Male=3.4, Female=3.3 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Major Diagnosis (Transplants: January 1992 – June 2017) Median survival (years): A1ATD: 7.1; CF: 9.9; COPD: 6.0; IIP: 5.2; ILD-not IIP: 6.7; IPAH: 7.0 All pairwise comparisons were significant at p < 0.05 except A1ATD vs. ILD-non IIP, A1ATD vs. IPAH, COPD vs. ILD-non IIP, and ILD-non IIP vs. IPAH. 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Major Diagnosis Conditional on Survival to 3 Months (Transplants: January 1992 – June 2017) All pairwise comparisons were significant at p < 0.05 except A1ATD vs. ILD-non IIP and CF vs. IPAH. Median survival (years): A1ATD: 8.4; CF: 11.2; COPD: 6.7; IIP: 6.3; ILD-not IIP: 7.6; IPAH: 10.6 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Major Diagnosis Conditional on Survival to 1 Year (Transplants: January 1992 – June 2017) All pairwise comparisons were significant at p < 0.05 except A1ATD vs. ILD-non IIP, CF vs. IPAH, and COPD vs. IIP. Median survival (years): A1ATD: 9.3; CF: 12.4; COPD: 7.4; IIP: 7.3; ILD-not IIP: 8.5; IPAH: 12.0 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Procedure Type Diagnosis: A1ATD (Transplants: January 1992 – June 2017) p<0.0001 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Procedure Type Diagnosis: COPD (Transplants: January 1992 – June 2017) p<0.0001 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Procedure Type Diagnosis: IIP (Transplants: January 1992 – June 2017) p<0.0001 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Procedure Type Diagnosis: ILD-not IIP (Transplants: January 1992 – June 2017) p<0.0001 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Procedure Type and Era Diagnosis: CF, Bilateral/Double Lung (Transplants: January 1992 – June 2017) 1992-2001 vs. 2002-2009: p<0.0001 1992-2001 vs. 2010-6/2017: p<0.0001 2002-2009 vs. 2010-6/2017: p = 0.0039 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsPercentage Experiencing Treated Rejection between Discharge and 1-Year Follow-Up (Follow-ups: January 2005 – June 2018) No pairwise comparisons were significant at < 0.05 except 18-34 vs. all other age groups and 50-59 vs. 60-65. Analysis is limited to patients who were alive at follow-up. Treated rejection = Recipient was reported to (1) have at least one acute rejection episode that was treated with an anti-rejection agent; or (2) have been hospitalized for rejection. 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsPercentage Experiencing Any Rejection between Discharge and 1-Year Follow-Up (Follow-ups: January 2005 – June 2018) No pairwise comparisons were significant at < 0.05 except 18-34 vs. all other age groups. Analysis is limited to patients who were alive at follow-up. No rejection = Recipient had (1) no acute rejection episodes and (2) was reported either as not hospitalized for rejection or did not receive anti-rejection agents. 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsPercentage Experiencing Treated Rejection between Discharge and 1-Year Follow-Up (Follow-ups: January 2005– June 2018) No pairwise comparisons were significant at < 0.05. Analysis is limited to patients who were alive at follow-up Treated rejection = Recipient was reported to (1) have at least one acute rejection episode that was treated with an anti-rejection agent; or (2) have been hospitalized for rejection. 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsPercentage Experiencing Any Rejection between Discharge and 1-Year Follow-Up (Follow-ups: January 2005 – June 2018) No pairwise comparisons were significant at < 0.05. Analysis is limited to patients who were alive at follow-up No rejection = Recipient had (1) no acute rejection episodes and (2) was reported either as not hospitalized for rejection or did not receive anti-rejection agents. 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Donor/Recipient CMV Status (Transplants: January 2005 – June 2017) All pairwise comparisons were significant at p < 0.05 except D(+)/R(+) vs. D(+)/R(-). 2019 citation
Functional and Employment Status and Rehospitalization Post Transplant 2019 citation
Adult Lung Transplants Length of Stay by Era (Transplants: January 2005 – 6/2018) 2019 citation
Adult Lung Transplants Length of Stay by Location (Transplants: January 2005 – 6/2018) 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsFunctional Status of Surviving Recipients by Karnofsky Score (Follow-ups: January 2010 – June 2018) 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsSurviving Recipients Working Post-Transplant (Follow-ups: January 2010 – June 2018) 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsRehospitalization Post Transplant of Surviving Recipients (Follow-ups: January 2010 – June 2018) 2019 citation
Induction and Maintenance Immunosuppression 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsInduction ImmunosuppressionAnalysis limited to patients receiving prednisone (Transplants: January 2005 – June 2018) N = 23,333 2019 Analysis is limited to patients who were alive at discharge. citation
Adult Lung TransplantsInduction ImmunosuppressionAnalysis limited to patients receiving prednisone (Transplants: 2005, 2010, January 2018 – June 2018) 2019 Analysis is limited to patients who were alive at discharge. citation
Adult Lung TransplantsInduction ImmunosuppressionAnalysis limited to patients receiving prednisone (Transplants: January 2005 – December 2017) 2019 Analysis is limited to patients who were alive at discharge. citation
Adult Lung TransplantsSurvival by Induction Usage Conditional on Survival to 14 Days (Transplants: January 1995 – June 2017) p<0.0001 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsSurvival by Induction Usage Conditional on Survival to 14 Days (Transplants: January 2005 – June 2017) p<0.0001 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsMaintenance Immunosuppression at Time of 1-Year Follow-upAnalysis limited to patients receiving prednisone (Follow-ups: January 2005 – June 2018) N = 19,173 2019 Analysis is limited to patients who were alive at follow-up. citation
Adult Lung TransplantsMaintenance Immunosuppression at Time of 1-Year Follow-upAnalysis limited to patients receiving prednisone • (Follow-ups: January 2005 – June 2018) Consecutive bars within each drug type represent follow-ups in years from 2005 through 6/2018 2019 Analysis is limited to patients who were alive at follow-up. citation
Adult Lung TransplantsMaintenance Immunosuppression Drug Combinations at Analysis limited to patients receiving prednisone Time of 1-Year Follow-up (Follow-ups: January 2005 – June 2018) 2019 Analysis is limited to patients who were alive at follow-up. citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Maintenance Immunosuppression Combinations Analysis limited to patients receiving prednisone Conditional on Survival to 1 Year (Transplants: January 2005 – June 2017) p = 0.0001 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsKaplan-Meier Survival by Maintenance Immunosuppression Combinations Analysis limited to patients receiving prednisone Diagnosis: CF Conditional on Survival to 1 Year (Transplants: January 2005 – June 2017) p<0.0001 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsPercentage Experiencing Treated Rejection between Discharge and 1-Year Follow-Up by Induction Type (Follow-ups: January 2005 – June 2018) No pairwise comparisons were significant at p < 0.05 except all comparisons with IL-2R. Analysis is limited to patients who were alive at follow-up. Treated rejection = Recipient was reported to (1) have at least one acute rejection episode that was treated with an anti-rejection agent; or (2) have been hospitalized for rejection. 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsPercentage Experiencing Any Rejection between Discharge and 1-Year Follow-Up by Induction Type (Follow-ups: January 2005 – June 2018) No pairwise comparisons were significant at p < 0.05 except No induction vs. IL-2R and Alemtuzumab and Polyclonal vs. IL-2R. Analysis is limited to patients who were alive at follow-up. No rejection = Recipient had (1) no acute rejection episodes and (2) was reported either as not hospitalized for rejection or did not receive anti-rejection agents. 2019 citation
Adult Lung TransplantsPercentage Experiencing Treated Rejection between Discharge and 1-Year Follow-Up by Maintenance Immunosuppression (Follow-ups: January 2005 – June 2018) All pairwise comparisons were significant at p < 0.05 except CyA+MMF/MPA vs. TAC+AZA Analysis is limited to patients who were alive at follow-up. Treated rejection = Recipient was reported to (1) have at least one acute rejection episode that was treated with an anti-rejection agent; or (2) have been hospitalized for rejection. 2019 citation