1 / 14

Personalised feedback vs consistency : the role of electronic marking and feedback .

Personalised feedback vs consistency : the role of electronic marking and feedback . Maureen Readle & Jak Radice Centre for Educational Development University of Bradford M.Readle@Bradford.ac.uk J.Radice@Bradford.ac.uk. Anonymous Marking. Drivers for eMarking / eFeedback. Blackboard

yoland
Télécharger la présentation

Personalised feedback vs consistency : the role of electronic marking and feedback .

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Personalised feedback vs consistency:the role of electronic marking and feedback. Maureen Readle & Jak Radice Centre for Educational Development University of Bradford M.Readle@Bradford.ac.uk J.Radice@Bradford.ac.uk

  2. Anonymous Marking Drivers for eMarking / eFeedback Blackboard PebblePad TurnitinUK 20 days Assessment & Feedback

  3. eMarking Process Anonymous marking Marking hidden from students

  4. How we use rubrics: 34+ Blackboard rubrics covering: • Audio Visual work • Essays / assignments • Exam essays • Lab reports • Portfolios • Posters • Practical work: OSCEs, NMSK, • Presentations • Seminars. iPads used to access Blackboard rubrics to mark: • Presentations • Practical work (OSCEs) • Mock interviews.

  5. Using Blackboard Rubrics Read the student’s work here … … or download the file here Open the rubric

  6. Using Blackboard Rubrics Grid View: Select the appropriate level for each criterion and add a comment if appropriate. Select the mark for each criteria from the range available.

  7. Using Blackboard Rubrics The rubric adds up the marks selected. Option to change the mark. General comment on the work.

  8. Using Blackboard Rubrics Rubric total is displayed Option to add notes for other markers. Grading notes are not seen by the student. Add a comment for the student so they know where to find their feedback

  9. Formative Feedback Inline grading: Annotating student’s text.

  10. Staff views Personalised feedback • Rubric used as a starting point to tailor individual feedback Consistent feedback • Rubric used to deliver common messages to cohort • Feedback given in a consistent manner

  11. Student Views The previous system enabled much more comprehensive and detailed feedback within the text. This was far more useful than the new system. Generally more consistent because the feedback was structured. I have noticed no reduction in the depth/quality of marking, and the fact that I can access it instantly from my phone is excellent.

  12. Student Views The quality and consistency still depends on the individual tutor who gives feedback disregarding the system (paper or electronic). The rubric is too generic, the feedback is not individualised, therefore not at all constructive therefore cannot be used to improve further assignments. … Tutors use rubrics as an excuse to not have to give individual feedback, as this allows them to just tick relevant boxes and not comment at all. Found it very impersonal.

  13. Discussion • What systems have you used? • How does your experience match with ours? • What plans do you have for eMarking? • Experience using iPads?

  14. Climbing the eMarking mountain Maureen Readle & Jak Radice Centre for Educational Development University of Bradford M.Readle@Bradford.ac.uk J.Radice@Bradford.ac.uk

More Related