1 / 28

Factors Driving Mercury Concentrations in Snapping Turtles

Factors Driving Mercury Concentrations in Snapping Turtles. Madeline Turnquist , Charles Driscoll, Martin Schlaepfer, & Kim Schulz July 14, 2010. Why Study Turtles for Mercury?. High in trophic position Long life span Small home range Sedentary life style

yuli-davidson
Télécharger la présentation

Factors Driving Mercury Concentrations in Snapping Turtles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Factors Driving Mercury Concentrations in Snapping Turtles Madeline Turnquist, Charles Driscoll, Martin Schlaepfer, & Kim Schulz July 14, 2010

  2. Why Study Turtles for Mercury? • High in trophic position • Long life span • Small home range • Sedentary life style • Unique biophysical characteristics • At times, consumed by humans

  3. Snapping Turtle Natural History • Chelydra serpentina • Description • Largest turtle in NY • Omnivores • Hibernate in winter • Females lay eggs in June • Reach sexual maturity late in life (~14yrs or 20cm) • High tolerance of pollutants • Habitat • Mainly freshwater • Bottom-dwellers Gibbs et al. 2007

  4. Objectives • Determine the driving factors for mercury concentrations in snapping turtles • Examine the correlation between body size and mercury levels • I hypothesize similar factors driving fish mercury levels are also driving the levels of mercury in snapping turtles.

  5. Objectives •   Measure a correlation between tissue mercury levels and scute mercury levels in snapping turtles. • I hypothesize a linear increase in shell mercury concentrations as mercury tissue concentrations increase.

  6. Methods and Data Collection • Lake selection

  7. Non-Lethal Tissue Sampling • Hoop nets set with bait for 12-48 hours

  8. Non-Lethal Sampling Methods • Weigh and Measure Turtle • Age Turtle • Take Shell Sample • 3rd Pleural scute • Take Muscle Sample from Tail and Legs

  9. Additional Data Collected • Water samples – pH, ANC, DOC, Total Phosphorus • Major Anions • GIS Data • Lake Area • Watershed Area • % Wetlands • % Forests – NLCD • Mercury Deposition

  10. Sample Analysis • Clean and crush shell samples • Total Hg - Milestone – DMA 80 • Paired t-test, Two-sample t-test • Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) • One-way ANOVA

  11. Results • Muscle – 0.041 – 1.50 µg g-1 • Shell – 0 .47 – 7.43 µg g-1 • Shell 12 times GREATER than muscle • Methyl Mercury – 94% • 8 subsamples • US EPA Action Limit – 0.3 µg g-1

  12. Results – Muscle • Leg and Tail mercury levels significantly different

  13. No correlation with Size or Sex

  14. Male vs. Female Mercury levels • Collectively – muscle mercury levels not significantly different • P-value = 0.746 • Shell length and weight significantly different

  15. Water Chemistry Correlations

  16. Landscape Correlations

  17. Average Muscle Hg n = 4 n = 2 n = 3 n = 8 n = 5 n = 1 n = 3 n = 7 EPA Action Limit (0.3 µg g-1) n = 1 n = 8 A B B AB AB AB B A B A

  18. Average Shell Hg n = 8 n =9 n = 5 n = 3 n = 5 n = 4 n = 2 n = 3 n = 8 n = 1 EPA Action Limit (0.3 µg g-1)

  19. Shell Correlated with Muscle r = 0.386 p-value = 0.012

  20. Final Thoughts • Female turtles were smaller than males • Eggs/young potential way to remove Hg • Shell as possible mechanism to eliminate mercury • Useful indicator of Hg level – potential to resample • ~38% above EPA action limit • Would not recommend consuming turtles

  21. Future Directions • Sample toe nails for Hg levels – less invasive • Skin samples to test Hg levels • Growth relationship between shell Hg • Mercury in lake sediments • Compare to fish levels • Possibly compare to loon levels

  22. Acknowledgements • Edna Bailey Sussman Foundation • Maggie Schultz • Martin Schlaepfer • Charles Driscoll • Kim Schulz • NYS Parks and Campsites • Eric Paul and Ben Durie • Ed Mason • Mario Montesdeoca • Bradley Blackwell

  23. Questions, Comments, Suggestions

  24. Environmental Factors controlling Hg • Water Chemistry • Low pH <6.0 • Low productivity – Total phosphorus < 30 µg/L • Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) > 4 mg/L • Acid-neutralizing capacity (ANC) < 100 µequiv./L • Landscape Characteristics • Presence of wetlands • Forest cover • Large watershed relative to lake size • Mercury deposition Driscoll et al. 2007

  25. High concentrations in their brains • Birth defects • Decreased neurological ability of hatchling turtles • Lowered population survival • Damage to kidneys and renal failure (nephrotoxic)

  26. Snapping Turtle Natural History • Natural History • Omnivore • Plants, Invertebrates • Fish, Birds, Carrion • Active foraging • Ambush predator • Hibernate in winter • Females lay eggs in June • High tolerance for polluted waters • Threats • High egg and hatchling mortality • Adults vulnerable to road mortality • Human persecution Gibbs et al. 2007

More Related