1 / 11

Formal Constraints in Legal Argumentation in Russia: the Case of the Russian Penal Procedure

Formal Constraints in Legal Argumentation in Russia: the Case of the Russian Penal Procedure. Ekaterina Samokina , National Research University HSE. Formalism in Russian legal system ; Confused legal notions ; Legal texts as constraints for legal argumentation ;

zahina
Télécharger la présentation

Formal Constraints in Legal Argumentation in Russia: the Case of the Russian Penal Procedure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Formal Constraints in Legal Argumentation in Russia: the Case of the Russian Penal Procedure Ekaterina Samokina, National Research University HSE

  2. Formalism in Russian legal system; • Confused legal notions; • Legal texts as constraints for legal argumentation; • Formality of penal procedure in Russia.

  3. Formalism in Russian legal system • monopoly of the legislator to set out legal norms; • precise and univocal rules and concepts; • deductive decision-making procedure.

  4. Judicial syllogism • legal rule (the major term); • concrete case (the minor term); • decision (the conclusion) Example • Commitment of theft is punished by imprisonment (Art. 158 ) • A. committed a theft _______________________________________ A. ought to be punished by the imprisonment

  5. Administration of justice

  6. Judicial syllogism

  7. Confused legal notions Confused notions appear • in the beginning of discussion when the interlocutors are governed by prejudices; • after discussing the matter when there are still controversies related to a certain irreducible vagueness of the terms we use (the case of legal and moral notions).

  8. There are two reasons that explain the presence of confused notions in jurisprudence • jurisprudence deals with human behavior, its motives, values and beliefs of the society that could not be expressed in univocal and clear terms; • language that is used in jurisprudence is natural one in opposition to an artificial (formalized) language.

  9. Legal texts as constraints for legal argumentation The specific of positive law as a special field of argument: • It is governed by the well-defined texts; • has to be developed within a definite system.

  10. Can penal procedure be formal? Main legislative acts regulating penal law: • Penal Code defines crime, guilt, motive and target of a crime, punishment, recidivation etc. and describes different types of legally defined crimes and punishment; • Code of Penal Procedure which regulates the process of accusation, prosecution, court procedure etc.

  11. Codes Both the Codes contain formal constraints for the legal argumentation. • in Penal Code: essential elements of the crime, the event of the crime, measure of punishment etc; • in the Code of Penal Procedure: judicial process.

More Related