1 / 19

Navigating Research Literacy Challenges and Opportunities in Museums

Dive into the complex world of research literacy in museums with a focus on frontier science, fast-paced updates, and the potential for controversy. Uncover the exciting opportunities for public engagement and collaboration, while exploring the implications of current research processes. Discover how museums can effectively communicate research content and engage with the public to promote greater understanding and involvement.

zanna
Télécharger la présentation

Navigating Research Literacy Challenges and Opportunities in Museums

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Research Literacy & PUR David A. Ucko, President Museums+more LLC

  2. Challenges • Frontier science vs. Established science Complexity; no "cookbooks" • Tentative results vs. Greater certainty Outcomes, significance less clear • Fast moving vs. Slower pace Requires rapid response, updating Ucko

  3. Challenges (cont.) • Messy process vs. "Sanitized" history More difficult to interpret • Possible consequences vs. Applications Potential for controversy Ucko

  4. Opportunities • Exploring the unknown • Excitement of discovery • Media coverage, resources • Human interest collaboration + competition • Potential for public engagement Ucko

  5. Research Literacy Components: • Content of current research • Process of research • Potential implications Ucko

  6. Content • Exhibitions:the primary medium • Frequent updating; staff intensive • Modularity, digital media cut time, cost Ex (small): ScienceNOW, Science Bulletins Ex (large): Antenna, Current Science & Technology Center Ucko

  7. Content (cont.) • Programs: flexible format, lower capital but ongoing operational costs • Skilled presenters hard to find, train Ex: FAST, Curiosity Corner Ucko

  8. Process • Exhibitions: Process difficult to portray • Story-telling techniques; media helps Ex: Çatalhöyük, Inquiry, Investigate! Ucko

  9. Process (cont.) • Virtual field trips access research sites • Interaction may be limited • Staff mediators increase impact Ex: Jason, Cardiac Classroom, Live@Exploratorium Ucko

  10. Process (cont.) • Hands-on research: inquiry-based learning • Need meaningful activities, partners • Can make research relevant Ex: Citizen science (Cornell, Denver) Ucko

  11. Implications • Programs (same as Content) • Theater effective for raising issues • Integrating art and science is difficult Ex: Copenhagen, Wellcome Trust Ucko

  12. Implications (cont.) • Forums, debates, conferences: local community forums • Civic engagement; "community center“ • Charged topics are challenging • Learn from European colleagues Ex: La Cité, Dana Centre, Café Scientifique Ucko

  13. Collaboration: Scientists • Concept development • Sources for research content, process • Provide validation, diverse viewpoints • Potential presenters, demonstrators • Research projects for citizen science • Sources: PIOs, Sigma Xi, SAS… Ucko

  14. Value for Scientists • “Broader impact” • Student recruitment • Promotion of field, self • Potential data sources • Community involvement Ucko

  15. Collaboration: Media • Concept development • Source for breaking news • Story, story, story • Visual and media resources • Cross-dissemination, promotion • Audience research findings Ucko

  16. Value for Media Site complementary to on-air presence • Meet their audience • Focus groups • Screenings, live shows • Special events • Educational outreach Ucko

  17. Collaboration: Regional & National • Concept development • Meetings with researchers, media • Directories with contact information • Consortia (like exhibits) • Cross-field information sharing • National PUR resource clearinghouse Ucko

  18. Conclusion • Identify Research Literacy “mix.” Content + Process + Implications • Public Engagement in Research (PER) Tool for achieving PUR PER  PUR • Collaborate end-to-end Ucko

  19. Resources • Creating Connections: Museums and the Public Understanding of Current Research (AltaMira Press) http://www.altamirapress.com/ • Presentation http://www.MuseumsPlusMore.com/ Ucko

More Related