1 / 13

Objective What is the effect of traffic scenarios to reduce CO 2 emissions

zaria
Télécharger la présentation

Objective What is the effect of traffic scenarios to reduce CO 2 emissions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WP-Traffic“develop GIS method and support cities to assess the impact of traffic-related CO2 emission reduction scenarios on air quality and noise in 2020”Laura Perez/Stephan Trueeb (STI-Basel); Arja Asikainen/Marjo Niittynen (THL-Kuopio); Willem-Jan Okkerse (DCMR-Rotterdam)/Menno Keuken (TNO); Sandra Torras Ortiz (Uni Stuttgart)/Manfred Wacker (Uni Stuttgart-Stuttgart); Denis Sarigiannis/Periklis Kontoroupis/Spyros Karakitsi (CERTH-Thessaloniki); Junhan Liu/Hongshuang Lau/Xiaochuan Pan (Uni Peking-Xi’an City) and Haikun Wang (Uni Nanjing-Suzhou City)

  2. Objective What is the effect of traffic scenarios to reduce CO2 emissions on well being and health in 2020? • traffic scenarios: • 10% less traffic/ 50% electric cars: Rotterdam, Basel, Xi’an and Suzhou • Bundle of measures: Stuttgart • Biofuels: Kuopio • Extra metro: Xi’an and Thessaloniki • well-being: • noise (Lden > 55 dB): highly annoyed • health: • AQ: annual average: NO2, PM2.5, PM10 and EC • noise: (Lnight > 50 dB): sleep disturbed • exposure population: • streets: > 10 000/24-h; < 100 m motorways; rest population

  3. Method • Input: GIS road infrastructure; GIS traffic; emission factors; AQ background concentrations; meteorology • Dispersion modelling: 2010, 2020, 2020+CO2 reduction scenarios • Output: AQ and noise data to WP-Health • Innovation: • EC (“soot”) as traffic/health indicator • Spatial resolved health effects: streets, motorways and “rest” • Dispersion modelling in Chinese cities

  4. Results (1)CO2 emissions from road traffic

  5. Results (2)EC (µg/m3) in Kuopio 2010 2020 Cleaner vehicles: Euro-6!

  6. Results (3)EC (µg/m3) in Suzhou 2010 2020 Lower regional background: fly-ash removal coal plants!

  7. Results (4)EC (µg/m3) in Rotterdam: 2020 & 2020-50% electric

  8. Results (4)EC (µg/m3) in Rotterdam: 2020 & 2020-50% electric

  9. Results (5)EC (µg/m3) in busy streets and urban background in Basel, Rotterdam, Xi’an and Suzhou

  10. Results (6)Health impact assessment – WP-Health • Impact of change in air quality on all-cause mortality in Life Years Lost: • ~ one year per 10 µg m-3 PM2.5 • ~ one year per 1 µg m-3 EC

  11. Results (7)Peer-reviewed papers • “Impact of measures to reduce CO2 emissions from road traffic on air quality in Basel, Rotterdam, Xi’an and Suzhou” • “Health impact assessment for noise and air quality related to transport policies in Rotterdam” • “Health impact assessment of transport policies in Basel” • …..

  12. Lessons learned? • Urban traffic CO2 emissions in 2020 versus 2010? • 30-50% increase in China and stabilize in Europe • 2. Effect urban traffic measures on CO2 emissions? • 5% (I) and 25% (II) reduction from urban road traffic • Effect urban traffic measures on AQ and noise? • limited on AQ and noise (even) near busy street canyons • 4. AQ assessment in China and Europe? • similar approach is applicable with “open source data” in China but more validation with observations is required: # vehicles, fleet composition, emission factors, AQ data and source apportionment

  13. Policy implications? Most effective to reduce CO2 emissions from urban road traffic is more stringent CO2 emission standards (clean technology: all electric) Most effective localclimatepolicy is support/facilitate/stimulate electric vehicles: maximum reduction 50% CO2 emissions from urban road traffic Most effective local integratedpolicy is supporting/facilitating physical/public transport to improve air quality, health and well-being

More Related