130 likes | 225 Vues
Ocean Observing System Status & Issues for GODAE. D.E. Harrison OOPC IGST-X November 2005. Outline. Planning Status of system implementation Reporting to UNFCCC GEOSS linkage Some Issues. PLANNING. GCOS IP completed & accepted by UNFCCC and GEOSS 10-yr plan
E N D
Ocean Observing SystemStatus & Issuesfor GODAE D.E. Harrison OOPC IGST-X November 2005
Outline • Planning • Status of system implementation • Reporting to UNFCCC • GEOSS linkage • Some Issues
PLANNING • GCOS IP completed & accepted by UNFCCC and GEOSS 10-yr plan • Review/Revision of IGOS-P Ocean Theme report • GCOS/CEOS group to address CEOS response to GCOS IP. Continuity & Climate quality of satellite data streams • Non-physical variables need more attention • Linkages w. coastal systems? • Collaboration with tsunami/natural disaster?
Status of Implementation • Modest in-situ system progress (~50% of GCOS IP). Argo going forward well • Satellite suite good at moment (trouble w. ice satellites, tho’), but concern about continuity & quality in future • Continuing challenge getting national reporting (and planning) • Continuing lack of international forum for discussion and development of national commitments
2006 ? • Budget concerns in US • Hoped to increase number of real time reporting tide gauges (~50) • Argo growth projected to continue • Ocean carbon/repeat hydro development • Satellite advocacy • JCOMM/GOOS panel for non-physical variables?
Reporting to UNFCCC • Conference of the Parties has called for annual reporting on status of implementation of ocean observing system • First such report given in May 2005 • Very limited response from nations to request for response to GCOS IP. • Took a positive tack by emphasizing number of nations contributing tide gauges • Interest level was considerable • NEED INDICES for COMMUNITY INTEREST
GEOSS Linkage • GEOSS 10-year plan links strongly to GCOS IP • Development of 2006 Work Plan still underway. Some unease with draft • Desirability of higher profile for ocean in GEOSS
Some Issues • Present plan weak on non-physical variables and ecosystems. Technical challenges considerable. R&D needs considerable. • Feedback from users has been non-specific • Evaluation/evolution actions limited to date • Subsurface index development slow • Surface flux issues…’SURFA’ efforts? • Can we getincreased advocacy, including from coastal groups? I-GOOS? Others? • National engagements with IP limited • System faces possibility of major disruption