1 / 64

VIRGO Superattenuators in next generation detectors S.Braccini, INFN-Pisa

VIRGO Superattenuators in next generation detectors S.Braccini, INFN-Pisa on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration. 1) SAT Seismic Isolation: Present & Future. 2) SAT “Passive Control”. 3) SAT Mechanical Glitch Noise. 2. Superattenuator. Magnetic Anti-Spring. 8 m. Blade Springs. 3. 2 Hz.

fawzi
Télécharger la présentation

VIRGO Superattenuators in next generation detectors S.Braccini, INFN-Pisa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. VIRGO Superattenuators in next generation detectors S.Braccini, INFN-Pisa on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration

  2. 1) SAT Seismic Isolation: Present & Future 2) SAT “Passive Control” 3) SAT Mechanical Glitch Noise 2

  3. Superattenuator Magnetic Anti-Spring 8 m Blade Springs 3

  4. 2 Hz Ground Resonances f-2N Transmisson Frequency (Hz) Long Pendula Soft Springs Mirror 4

  5. 2 Hz Resonances f-2N Frequency (Hz) Large Inertia Thin Wires 5

  6. Stage by Stage Measurement Thermal Noise Ground Seismic Noise Mirror Residual Seismic Noise 6

  7. DirectMeasurement SA design e freccette 7

  8. TF < 1.7 x 10-12 TOP 1.2 x 10-6m Hz-1/2 MIRROR 2 x 10-18m Hz-1/2 8

  9. TF = 1.26 x 10-11 TOP MIRROR ! ! 9

  10. Upper limitHoriz Upper limit Vertical 10

  11. Upper limitHoriz Upper limit Vertical 11

  12. SA design e freccette SA design e freccette X-Excitation Experiment Bypass ? 12

  13. AdV - Seismic Isolation OK ET - Reduction of low frequency cut-off 13

  14. Stage by Stage TF Crossing expected @ 2.5-3 Hz 14

  15. Confirmed by direct measurements Horiz Vertical ET ETx Horizontal seismic noise dominant 15

  16. PRESENT CROSS-OVER ET ETx 16

  17. Change both number of filters and their distance (thus varying the total length) HORIZONTAL TF 17

  18. HORIZONTAL 5 filters - 15 m 7 filters - 16 m 6 filters - 17 m 6 filters - 14 m TF 1.8 Hz 18

  19. Upper limitHoriz Upper limit Vertical Vertical Attenuation 19

  20. 6 Filters (as now) TF FILTER @ 310 mHz

  21. CONCLUSION 3rd GENERATION: Use identical technology with cross-over below 2 Hz Present SA extension 9 17 m (1.8 Hz conservative cross-over) 21

  22. 1) Seismic Isolation: Present & Future 2) “Passive Control” 3) Mechanical Glitch Noise 22

  23. several microns mirror swing 23

  24. Accelerometers DSP DAC Actuators ADC 24

  25. Swing reduction by ID + ultra-low freq. passive attenuation 8 m 25

  26. Alignment without affecting mirror swing (Payload ad hoc design) 1) Intrinsically diagonalized (Easy control) 2) “Nothing happens” in the off-diagonal world 26

  27. “Passive strategy” in prealignment (qy) 27

  28. “Passive strategy” in prealignment (qx) 28

  29. Alignment transparent for SA 8 m 29

  30. Acquire the locking with no recoil 30

  31. Acquire the locking with negligible recoil 31

  32. Lock Acquisition transparent for SAT 8 m

  33. 1) Longitudinal swing fraction of mm/s 2) Prealign mirror (fract. of mrads) (not affecting 1) 3) Lock acquisition (not affecting 1 - 2) 8 m 4) Reallocation & Tidal Control (not affecting 1 - 2 - 3) Residual Swing LONGITUDINAL: around 100 nm pk pk ANGLES: fractions of mrad pk pk

  34. 500 nrad RESIDUAL (OPEN LOOP) DISPLACEMENTS 100 nm SMALL LOCKING & ALIGNMENT CORRECTIONS  LOW NOISE HIGH ACCURACY: 10 nrads on PR,a few nrads on test masses

  35. RM AdV Marionetta CONTROL NOISE - OK for AdV 35

  36. 1) Seismic Isolation: Present & Future 2) “Passive Control” 3) Mechanical Glitch Noise 36

  37. Self-organized criticality dynamics of dislocations induces a mechanical shot-noise force (1/f) 37

  38. Potential problem in last filter(s) of the chain 38

  39. 3 VERTICAL MODES F7 -Blades 40 Hz Marionetta 15 Hz 7 Hz Reference Mass Mirror 39

  40. MODES VISIBLE IN DARK FRINGE Displacement Strain (m Hz^-1/2) 40 Freq (Hz)

  41. TF MEASUREMENT Blades Mar RM Mir 41

  42. TF MEASUREMENT Mirror-Beam Displacement (m) / Vertical Force (N) 7 Hz 15 Hz 40 Hz Freq (Hz) 42

  43. VERTICAL FORCE UPPER LIMIT z(w) = TF(w) x Fv(w) 7 Hz 40 Hz Fv_max (w) = z(w) / TF(w) 43

  44. VERTICAL FORCE UPPER LIMIT Vertical Force (Upper Limit – N/Hz1/2) Freq (Hz) 44

  45. VERTICAL FORCE UPPER LIMIT Vertical Force (Upper Limit – N/Hz1/2) Freq (Hz) 45

  46. VERTICAL FORCE UPPER LIMIT Vertical Force (Upper Limit – N/Hz1/2) X TF Freq (Hz) 46

  47. h(f) Virgo AdV 1/f noise upper limit 47

  48. START PARENTHESIS (just for a betterunderstanding)

  49. F Vertical Force on Marionetta  MirrorDisplacementalongbeam z

  50. Closedparenthesis h(f) Virgo AdV 1/f noise upper limit

More Related