1 / 11

NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG)

NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG). September 25, 2003 Co-Chairs: Karen Mulberry, MCI Jim Castagna, Verizon. Contents. PA Change Order #24 Recommendation PA Annual Performance Review Proposal NANPA/NOWG Performance Metrics Review

orla-simmons
Télécharger la présentation

NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NANC ReportNumbering Oversight Working Group(NOWG) September 25, 2003 Co-Chairs: Karen Mulberry, MCI Jim Castagna, Verizon

  2. Contents • PA Change Order #24 Recommendation • PA Annual Performance Review Proposal • NANPA/NOWG Performance Metrics Review • Status NANPA 2003 Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) • 2003 Meeting Schedule • Attachments - Tracking Documents • PA #24 Change Order Recommendation • PA Change Order Tracking Summary • NOWG Project Status Table NOWG NANC Report

  3. PA Change Order #24 Recommendation • Change Order #24 submitted on 08-26-03 • This change order is associated with modifications to procedures for Code Holder/LERG Assignee Exit and associated service disruptions with PA block assignments that contain unknown contamination • There was three cost options identified (A $456,000; B $228,000; and C $91,200) • The NOWG worked with the PA to identify a modified solution, and recommends this alternative be accepted • Recommendation: PA select one NPA from each US NPAC region and perform an audit of embedded block inventory. The results will assist in determining if there is value in proceeding with a one time scrub of the entire PAS embedded base. NOWG NANC Report

  4. NOWG PA Performance ReviewProposal Overview The survey and corresponding NOWG report will focus on the adequacy and appropriateness of the tasks performed by the PA when discharging its duties in accordance with regulatory requirements, numbering resource assignment procedures, and industry guidelines. • Review applicable requirements, regulatory orders and guidelines. • Draft annual PA performance assessment survey questions with input by State Commissions and the PA. • Present final draft of the annual survey to the NANC/FCC. • PA to post the survey to the PA web site and notify State Commissions and telecommunication industry participants. • Meet with PA to perform PA Operational Review. • Draft report identifying process improvement opportunities and recommendations. • Present a draft report to the FCC and the PA. • Present the final report to NANC for forwarding to the FCC. • Prepare a work plan to track and coordinate the implementation of the performance improvement opportunities and recommendations endorsed by the NANC. NOWG NANC Report

  5. Proposal - PA Performance Review Timeline NOWG NANC Report

  6. PA Annual PerformanceSurvey Contents • PA survey based on NANPA survey format • NANPA rating scale used • Questions focused on pooling administration activities and functions • Proposed survey attached. NOWG NANC Report

  7. NANPA Performance MetricsJuly & August 2003 • CO Code Administration • July - One code assignment in error/rejection • NRUF • 100% Compliance (busy season) • NPA Relief Planning • 100% Compliance • Other NANP Resources • July - One CIC not processed within 10 days NOWG NANC Report

  8. Status NANPA 2003Process Improvement Plan (PIP) • CAS (Code Administration System) Improvements to be embedded in the new NANP Administration System (NAS) • Allow negative numbers to be added to the MTE form. • Expand the NPA field to specify more than one NPA in the case of an overlay. • Compatibility of CAS with local SP systems to auto-populate internally generated Part 1’s and Part 4’s. • NAS Features Still Under Review/Consideration • Ability to insert or connect supporting documentation rather than having to send them to the NANPA separately. • Ability to change or delete a Part 1 and save a Part 1 for later submission. • Use of a “Back” button so you may go back to previous screens. NOWG NANC Report

  9. Status NANPA 2003Process Improvement Plan (PIP) (con’t) • CAS/LERG/NRUF Discrepancies • August 2002 Versus September 2003 • 7496 Total Discrepancies reduced 66% to 2512 • 3754 OCN Discrepancies reduced 93% to 264 • 1222 Rate Center Discrepancies reduced 46% to 663 • 2520 Code State Discrepancies reduced 37% to 1585 • Third Discrepancy Code lists to be posted on 9/25 for SP analysis • NANPA announced they are considering a contribution to propose a hard edit for OCN changes in the LERG • NANPA Submitted INC Issue 420: Data Integrity of Number Assignment Records to clarify SP requirement to send Part 1 to NANPA when making information changes • NANPA preparing Written Process for Reserving NPAs NOWG NANC Report

  10. PIP - NANPA CAS/LERG Comparison NOWG NANC Report

  11. 2003 Meeting Schedule Contact either of the Co-Chairs for complete meeting or conference call details karen.mulberry@mci.com or james.t.castagna@verizon.com (Other meetings for the NOWG may be scheduled as needed beyond what has been identified in this list) WG meeting records and documents posted on the NANC Chair web site NOWG NANC Report

More Related