1 / 14

Mobilising Knowledge Networks, World Bank, 20 June 2012

Mobilising knowledge for development. Alan Stanley Adrian Bannister. Mobilising Knowledge Networks, World Bank, 20 June 2012. Who we are. Wicked question. Understanding context is essential for designing effective knowledge services Partnerships are important for understanding context

Mercy
Télécharger la présentation

Mobilising Knowledge Networks, World Bank, 20 June 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mobilising knowledge for development Alan Stanley Adrian Bannister Mobilising Knowledge Networks, World Bank, 20 June 2012

  2. Who we are

  3. Wicked question Understanding context is essential for designing effective knowledge services Partnerships are important for understanding context How do you identify the right partner to work with without already understanding the context?

  4. Understanding partnerships Facilitated self evaluation Key characteristics of knowledge intermediaries

  5. Understanding context - Research policy praxis country studies • Over 600 respondents from 6 countries - Kenya, Nepal, India, Ghana, Bangladesh and Ethiopia • Policy-actors - including national government, local government, NGO, private sector, research and media • Research questions: • What is the current information ecosystem for policy actors in those countries? • What are the possibilities that these policy actors will pick up on ‘new services’ (technologies and software) • What does that mean for researchers and knowledge brokers seeking to improve research use in evidence informed decision making?

  6. Understanding context - Research policy praxis country studies • How do decision-makers access information for their work? Respondents were asked to comment on the statement: “I tend to get my briefings face to face officially, in meetings” (-2) Strongly disagree, (-1) Disagree, (0) Not Sure, (1) Agree, (2) Strongly Agree.

  7. Understanding context - Research policy praxis country studies • Statement “I tend to get my briefings face to face, officially, in meetings”

  8. Understanding context - Research policy praxis country studies • How do decision-makers access information for their work? Respondents were asked to comment on the statement: “Local research is often not relevant” (-2) Strongly disagree, (-1) Disagree, (0) Not Sure, (1) Agree, (2) Strongly Agree.

  9. Understanding context - Research policy praxis country studies • Statement “Local research is often not relevant”

  10. Understanding context - Research policy praxis country studies • Conclusions: • Some evidence that policy actors are searching for information themselves • Some evidence that this behaviour increases as connectivity improves • Policy actors value international research significantly more than local research (except India) • Policy actors value formal research more i(except Ghana) Overall: • High variability between countries – understanding context is important • What does it mean for knowledge brokers? More work needed!

  11. Understanding effective knowledge products • Are policy briefings effective? • Joint research – IDS, 3ie and NORAD • Little research done and what exists is conflicting • YES! - 79% of policy makers think that policy briefs are valuable communications tools (ODI, SciDev) • NO! - “among the least useful forms of information exchange” (IDRC Think Tanks Initaitive) • Characteristics of effective briefings (Jones and Walsh) • Authority – the messenger (individual or organisation) has credibility • Opinion – the presentation of author’s own views about policy implications of research finding

  12. Understanding effective knowledge products • Are policy briefings effective? • Joint research – IDS, 3ie and NORAD • Randomized Control Trial to examine the effectiveness of policy briefing format, and query whether different versions of a briefing bring about different results. 3 treatments plus “placebo” • Treatment 1 (T1) - A basic 3 page policy brief - allowing us to test for an effect resulting from delivery of information • Treatment 2 (T2) A basic 3 page policy brief accompanied by an opinion piece attributed to a named sector expert – allowing us to test for an authority effect • Treatment 3 (T3) A basic 3 page policy brief accompanied by an opinion piece attributed to an unnamed IDS research fellow – allowing us to test for an opinion effect

  13. Understanding effective knowledge products • Are policy briefings effective? • Joint research – IDS, 3ie and NORAD • Findings: • Can policy briefs change the beliefs of readers who held strong prior beliefs? • Can they create evidence-accurate beliefs among readers holding no prior beliefs? • Does presenting the authors own views on the policy recommendations make any difference? • Does this effect increase if opinion is authoritative?

  14. Find out more… www.bit.ly/ids-ks www.impactandlearning.org/

More Related