1 / 31

Multitrophic interactions

Multitrophic interactions. Interactions across trophic levels, or involving more than two “players”. Multitrophic interactions.

Télécharger la présentation

Multitrophic interactions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.


Presentation Transcript

  1. Multitrophic interactions • Interactions across trophic levels, or involving more than two “players”

  2. Multitrophic interactions • Interactions in real communities include all interactions discussed so far (competition, herbivory, predation, pollination) plus others (decomposers, mutualistic and antagonistic fungi, predators and parasitoids) • How does the outcome of one interaction affect the outcome of another?

  3. Why the world is green • Predators, parasites, and diseases keep herbivores rare (top-down regulation). Hairston et al. 1960 Predators Herbivores Plants Hairston, Smith, Slobodkin. 1960. Am Nat 44: 421-425

  4. Why the world is green, part 2 • Plants are fundamentally poor food (bottom-up regulation) Southwood 1973. • Herbivores are “between the devil [predators] and the deep blue sea [inedible food]” Lawton and McNeill 1979.

  5. Playing Chutes and Ladders • Top-down and bottom-up both important Hunter and Price 1992. Ecology 73: 724-732

  6. Trophic cascades do not include all interactions De Deyn and Van Der Putten, 2005. TREE 20 (11) 625-633

  7. Predator-prey-plant • Reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone leads to aspen recovery—through both predation and fear • Recovery primarily in riparian areas with downed logs (predation risk higher) Ripple and Beschta 2007. Biological Conservation 138:514-519

  8. Predator-prey-plant

  9. Fish-dragonfly-pollinator-plant(predator-predator-prey-plant)Fish-dragonfly-pollinator-plant(predator-predator-prey-plant) • Fish eat dragonfly larvae; dragonflies eat pollinators like bees and flies Knight et al. 2005. Nature 437:880-883

  10. Fish-dragonfly-pollinator-plant • Fewer dragonfly larvae in and adults near pods with fish (for three size categories) Knight et al. 2005. Nature 437:880-883

  11. Fish-dragonfly-pollinator-plant • Visit rate higher near ponds with fish; plants near these ponds had lower pollen limitation Knight et al. 2005. Nature 437:880-883

  12. Plant-herbivore-enemy • Scale insects perform differently on different citrus cultivars; performance of scale affects size and sex ratio of offspring of parasitoid wasp Hare and Luck, 1991. Ecology. 72: 1576-1585

  13. Plant-herbivore-enemy defended • A trait that defends against herbivores reduces time enemies spend hunting prey on Datura Gassman and Hare, 2005. Oecologia 144:62-71

  14. Plant-herbivore-enemy • Herbivore survival depends on both plant defenses and enemies Gassman and Hare, 2005. Oecologia 144:62-71

  15. Plant-plant-enemy • Dodder (Cuscuta) in salt marsh changed competitive relationships

  16. Plant-plant-enemy • Herbivore damage may increase when competitors (that protect the herbivore) are present J. Facelli, unpublished

  17. Plant-herbivore-pollinator • Flower size smaller in plants damaged manually or by herbivores Strauss 1997. Ecology 78:1640-1645

  18. Plant-herbivore-pollinator • Pollinators discriminate based on flower size Strauss and Conner 1996. Am Nat 147:1098-1107.

  19. Impact Plant-host-herbivore-pollinator • Castilleja (indian paintbrush) is a hemiparasite • Experimentally grown on lupine hosts that either do or do not produce chemical defense (alkaloid)

  20. Plant-host-herbivore-pollinator • Alkaloids from host plant reduce herbivory, increase pollinator visits in Castilleja % plants visited Adler 2000. Am Nat 156:92-99

  21. Plant-mychorrizae-pollinator • Smaller flower size, reduced visitation in fireweed without AM fungi (compared to plants with AM fungi) Wolfe et al 2005. Ecology Letters 8:218-223

  22. Plant-plant-mychorrizae-pollinator-pollinator • Suppression of mychorrizae in rough fescue grassland changed # flowering stems per plot in a species-specific manner Cahill, Elle, Smith, Shore 2008. Ecology 89:1791-1801

  23. Plant-plant-mychorrizae-pollinator-pollinator • Three species (non-myc) increased when myc suppressed, others no significant change

  24. Plant-plant-mychorrizae-pollinator-pollinator • Myc suppression reduced per-stem visit rate… for species with no change in stem number

  25. Plant-plant-mychorrizae-pollinator-pollinator • Change in plant community led to change in pollinator community Flies Small sweat bees Bumble bees Cahill, Elle, Smith, Shore 2008. Ecology 89:1791-1801

  26. Whole community mutualism • Tide pools are low N areas, only slow-growing seaweeds usually grow there • Fast-growing Cladophora, when associated with invertebrates, can grow even in N-limited tide pools (ostracods, nematodes, polychaetes, etc) Bracken et al 2007. Ecology 88(9):2211-2219

  27. Whole community mutualism • Cladophora adds structure to tide pools, allows for greater total biodiversity when present

  28. Ecosystem-level effects • Poplar species hybridize; grow along rivers • Genetic variation among parent species (Populus fremontii and P. angustifolia) and their hybrids in leaf tannin content Many papers by Tom Whitham and others

  29. Ecosystem-level effects • Variation in tannins affects: • Population densities of endophytic fungi, aquatic invertebrates, herbivorous insects, insectivorous birds • Decomposition rate of leaves, N mineralization in the soil

  30. Ecosystem-level effects • Experimental planting of poplars: • Selective felling by beavers (avoid trees high in tannin) • Change in relative frequency of high-tannin trees: beavers select for more tannins!

  31. Multitrophic interactions • Some multitrophic effects can be predicted from pairwise interaction effects and trophic cascades • Thus far, no emerging theory; we are working towards integrating mutualism, competition into models of trophic cascades to allow for better prediction

More Related