SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Integrating Land Use, Transportation, and Energy: Key Insights for Sustainable Urban Design

aidan-cochran avatar
12 diapositives · 243 Views · Nov 09, 2014

This analysis explores the interplay between land use, transportation modes, and energy consumption, guided by Susan Handy from the University of California Davis. It emphasizes the importance of trip distance, frequency, and quality in reducing automobile dependence through improved infrastructure. Utilizing insights from Newman and Kenworthy's work, the paper highlights how urban design and coordinated policies can enhance connectivity and sustainability. It raises critical questions about the role of land use in energy conservation and the benefits of fostering proximity and quality in urban development.

Integrating Land Use, Transportation, and Energy: Key Insights for Sustainable Urban Design - slide 1
01 / 12Integrating Land Use, Transportation, and Energy: Key Insights for Sustainable Urban Design
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Integrating Land Use, Transportation, and Energy: Key Insights for Sustainable Urban Design
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Transportation, Energy, InfrastructureHow Does Land Use Fit In? Susan Handy University of California Davis

  2. Mode Choice Transit, walk, bike Trip Distance Proximity Quality Lower Shorter Trip Frequency More chaining? Land use contribution to transportation energy consumption Land Use Energy Use

  3. Source: Newman and Kenworthy. Urban Design to Reduce Automobile Dependence. Opolis. Vol. 2, No. 1, Paper 3, 2006.

  4. Source: Newman and Kenworthy. Urban Design to Reduce Automobile Dependence. Opolis. Vol. 2, No. 1, Paper 3, 2006.

  5. Infrastructure Connectivity Quality Transit, walk, bike Trip Distance Proximity Quality Lower Shorter Trip Frequency More chaining? Infrastructure contribution to transportation energy consumption Mode Choice Land Use Energy Use

  6. Trip Distance Trip Frequency Infrastructure pricing contribution to transportation energy consumption Infrastructure Mode Choice Road pricing Transit, walk, bike Land Use Energy Use Proximity Quality Lower Shorter Lower

  7. Trip Distance Trip Frequency Parking contribution to transportation energy consumption Infrastructure Mode Choice Easy parking Driving Land Use Energy Use Proximity Quality Shorter Higher Higher

  8. Highways Fringe areas Outward expansion Transit Central areas Compact growth Transportation infrastructure impact on land use Infrastructure Accessibility Land Use

  9. Transportation infrastructure as land use

  10. Coordinating transportation investments with land use policies

  11. Temporal Contextual Near term Old areas Long term New areas Dimensions to consider Spatial Neighborhood Region

  12. Final Thoughts • How important is land use relative to technology in reducing energy use? • Are there other good reasons to encourage proximity and quality in land use?