SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Geocoding Workgroup Brief

alban avatar
alban
15 diapositives · 289 Views · Feb 22, 2014

Geocoding Workgroup Brief. MnGeo Statewide Advisory Council December 29, 2010. Mike Dolbow Workgroup Co-Chair. Reason for Being. Applied Geographics identified as a strategic investment for MnGeo:

Geocoding Workgroup Brief - slide 1
01 / 15Geocoding Workgroup Brief
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Geocoding Workgroup Brief
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. Geocoding Workgroup Brief MnGeo Statewide Advisory Council December 29, 2010 Mike Dolbow Workgroup Co-Chair

  2. Reason for Being Applied Geographics identified as a strategic investment for MnGeo: “the need for accurate and current statewide addressing, and an attendant geocoding web service, was identified by virtually all state agencies” -- Final Program Design Report, section 5.2.3http://www.gis.state.mn.us/committee/MSDI/dte/Pr ogramDesign_FinalFeb09_V21.pdf

  3. Also… The 2010 Legislature increased standards for transparency, partly by ensuring that: “all geospatial data conform to an approved state geocode model.” -- 2010 Minnesota Statutes 16E.05, Subd. 4 (3) https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=16E.05

  4. Define Geocoding The process of finding geographic coordinates from other geographic data, such as street addresses or zip codes.

  5. Data vs. Geocoding Support Data Data: 707 Cook Ave E, St. Paul, MN Support Data: Parcels, Centerlines, etc. Result: 44.973158,-93.070529

  6. Existing Options • Google Maps – limitations on numbers, must be on a public site • ESRI – not developed with local data • MetroGIS – not statewide, no batch

  7. Who is Geocoding? • State Agencies • Local Governments • Non Profits • Research Groups • Federal Governments • …Who isn’t geocoding?

  8. Geocoding Workgroup • Mike Dolbow, MDA • Kent Treichel, Revenue • Mary Arvesen, DHS • Bob Basques, St. Paul • Brad Anderson, Moorhead • Brad Neuhauser, SOS • Jessica Fendos, DEED • Jessica Deegan, MN Housing • Jennifer Johnson, DOC • Sandi Kuitunen, MnGeo • Paula Lindgren, MDH • Lee Meilleur, LCC • Fred Logman, MnGeo • Tim Zimmerman, Hennepin County • John Wiersma, DHS • Will Craig, U of M

  9. Efforts to Date • Workgroup Charter created • Work plan / milestones created from charter • “Ideal” service requirements document created • Potential benefits drafted

  10. Next Steps • Identify potential solutions with an RFI • Any innovative solutions out there? • What would they cost? • What data would they require (and what would that cost)? • Would it be a product (software code) or a service (hosted solution)?

  11. Next Steps cont. • Assess costs of potential solutions • Initial • Ongoing • Compare to current • Brief Cost/Benefit analysis

  12. Next Steps cont. • Assess and acquire potential support data sets • Recommend a solution to be developed or acquired • Report and present findings to MnGeo Advisory Councils

  13. Timeline • Best case scenario: • RFI Posted by 1/31/2011 • RFI Results by 3/31/2011 • Support data assessment in interim • Recommendations by 6/30/2011

  14. More Information http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/workgroup/geocoding/

  15. Q&A • Who in the room has a need for geocoding? • Is anyone paying for a solution (or support data)? • Are locals willing to contribute data to a statewide solution? • What kinds of solutions are used?