1 / 3

Evaluation of Phased Array Radar Data via Comparisons to the WSR-88D

Evaluation of Phased Array Radar Data via Comparisons to the WSR-88D. Pam Heinselman Weather Radar Research. 2008 Phased Array Radar Experiment. 19 NWS forecasters from 17 WFOs. Forecasters evaluated:

aloha
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluation of Phased Array Radar Data via Comparisons to the WSR-88D

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluation of Phased Array Radar Data via Comparisons to the WSR-88D Pam Heinselman Weather Radar Research

  2. 2008 Phased Array Radar Experiment 19 NWS forecasters from 17 WFOs Forecasters evaluated:  Strengths and limitations of PAR data in analysis of severe storms  How characteristics of PAR scan strategies affect interpretation of severe storms  How PAR data affects warning decision making  How PAR data may be of benefit to operational responsibilities NSSL Laboratory Review February 17-19, 2009

  3. Example Case: Microburst 15 August 2006 PAR: 34 s Representative Forecaster Comments (N=17) “High temporal resolution of PAR allowed me to identify near-ground-level severe winds which were considerably under-played by KTLX (27 kt vs 57 kt).” “You can diagnose better what’s going on so you can have more confidence in issuing or not issuing warnings.” WSR-88D: 4.1 min “Rapid updates will help get the warning out period. We have many missed pulse storm hail and wind warnings.” NSSL Laboratory Review February 17-19, 2009

More Related