SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Enhancing Teacher Evaluations: Completing Summary Rating Forms and Summative Conferencing

alyssa avatar
48 diapositives · 659 Views · Jul 29, 2014

This training session, led by education consultants, focuses on the North Carolina Educator Evaluation System (NCEES). Participants will learn how to effectively complete the Summary Rating Form and navigate the end-of-year summative conferencing process. Key topics include understanding the evaluation criteria, utilizing data to inform ratings, and engaging in reflective coaching practices. Attendees will gain insights into best practices for teacher performance evaluation, facilitating professional development, and enhancing instructional effectiveness for improved educational outcomes.

Enhancing Teacher Evaluations: Completing Summary Rating Forms and Summative Conferencing - slide 1
01 / 48Enhancing Teacher Evaluations: Completing Summary Rating Forms and Summative Conferencing
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Teacher Evaluations: Completing Summary Rating Forms and Summative Conferencing
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Completing the Summary Rating Form and End-of-Year Summative Conferencing

  2. NCEES Support Kimberly Simmons, North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Consultantkimberly.simmons@dpi.nc.gov

  3. Your Region 8 Professional Development Team Joyce Gardner joyce.gardner@dpi.nc.gov 828.242.9872 Becky Pearson becky.pearson@dpi.nc.gov 828.803.8315 Jason Rhodes jason.rhodes@dpi.nc.gov 828.279.8020

  4. http://wikicentral.ncdpi.wikispaces.netNCDPI Wiki Central

  5. NC Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Wiki http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net

  6. Today’s Outcomes

  7. Ice Breaker Name District and Position One belief about educator evaluation One exciting thing that has happened this year (personal or professional)

  8. Today’s Outcomes

  9. State Board of Education Policy on Evaluation http://sbepolicy.dpi.state.nc.us/policies/TCP-C-004.asp?pri=02&cat=C&pol=004&acr=TCP

  10. Review of the Teacher Evaluation Process

  11. The teacher performanceevaluation process: • Serves as a measurement of performance for individual teachers; • Serves as a guide for teachers as they reflect upon and improve their effectiveness; • Serves as the basis for instructional improvement; • Guides professional development programs for teachers; • Serves as a tool in developing coaching and mentoring programs for teachers; • Enhances the implementation of the approved curriculum; and • Informs higher education institutions as they develop the content and requirements for teacher training programs.

  12. Evaluation Comparison Chart

  13. Understanding the Process Page 18, NC Teacher Evaluation Process Manual

  14. Today’s Outcomes

  15. Scoring the Rubric Observations – Data-Collection • Observer checks descriptors observed. • It is NOT necessary to check all descriptors left to right as evaluators make notations on the rubric for observations completed in the evaluation cycle. • ONLY check the descriptors observed during the observation.

  16. Completing the Summative

  17. Defining the Ratings

  18. In Summary

  19. Today’s Outcomes

  20. Today’s Outcomes

  21. Scoring the Rubric • Summary Rating Form Must have– • Rating for each element • Overall rating for each standard • ALL data used to inform the ratings • Overall rating for each standard is NOT an average. • The overall rating is at the principal’s discretion.

  22. Viewing Previous Observation Data

  23. Completing the Summary Rating Form cont. The administrator may type in information in the Comments, Recommended Actions for Improvement, and Resources Needed to Complete these Actions sections. The administrator may also check the appropriate boxes in the Evidence or Documentation to Support Rating section or add additional items in the open text boxes.

  24. Today’s Outcomes

  25. Reviewing the Summary Rating Form After the administrator has completed the Summary Rating Form, the Allow the teacher to view this summary rating form box in Summary Status may be checked so the teacher can view the form. An additional file may be added prior to the principal/evaluator signature by clicking on Choose File to find your file and then Add File. After the form is complete, click on the box in the Principal/Evaluator Signature column and follow the electronic signature steps previously described.

  26. Rating the Elements

  27. https://mxweb3.media-x.com/home/ncval/demo/

  28. Rating the Standards

  29. Group Activity • Review all evidence for Ms Permenter. • Assign an overall rating to each standard. • Discuss and reach consensus.

  30. Today’s Outcomes

  31. Reflective Coaching Adapted from Costa and Garmston (1985) Cognitive Coaching Framework

  32. Reflective Coaching is not… • Reflective coaching has nothing to do with evaluation. Observations are not evaluations…they are single points in time. • The evaluation is the Summary Rating Form completed at the end of the evaluation process. • Mentoring

  33. Requirements for Reflective Coaching • Trust • Communication Awareness • Appropriate Responses • Knowledge • Structure • Questioning

  34. Example: Why did you do it that way? vs. What would you do differently next time if you could? Judgmental vs. Non-Judgmental Questioning

  35. Reflecting Map Summary of impression and recalling supporting information Analyze causal factors that impacted the event Construct new learning, Set new goals Commit to the application Reflect on coaching process and design refinement Summary Rating Conference Coaching

  36. Coaching • Begins with open-ended question • Teacher does most of the talking • Coaches comments are grounded in facts • Paraphrasing shows that you value what you are hearing

  37. Today’s Outcomes

  38. Uploading Artifacts

  39. Today’s Outcomes

  40. Teacher Adding Comments

  41. Resources

  42. Facilitated Course Tara Patterson (log out) https://ncelearning.org/sectionsopen

  43. NC Educationhttps://center.ncsu.edu/nc

  44. READY www.ncpublicschools.org/ready/resources/

  45. Access the NCEES Wiki for this presentation:http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net

  46. RttT Survey and Feedback for Us

  47. Questions?