IPEDS Workshop
This document provides a comprehensive recap of the 2003-04 IPEDS Workshop and SHEEO/IPEDS Meeting held in Washington, DC, from March 30 to April 1, 2004. It outlines key dates for the Spring 2004 data collection cycle, including enrollment, financial aid, and graduation rates reporting requirements. It also discusses follow-up notifications to institutions regarding survey participation and CIP data reporting changes. Additionally, it details compliance updates, data validity studies, and updates on the Prior Year Data Revision System aimed at improving data submission accuracy.
IPEDS Workshop
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Recap of 2003-04 IPEDS Workshop 2004 SHEEO/IPEDS Meeting Washington, DC March 30 – April 1, 2004
Current Collection • Spring 2004 • Opened March 5 • Closes for institutions April 21 • Closes for coordinators May 5 • Components • Enrollment • Student Financial Aid • Graduation Rates • Finance
Spring News • NCAA and Graduation Rates • NCAA has requested that member institutions submit data directly to NCAA • Institutions may not use printed data forms directly from IPEDS data collection system
Spring Followup • First followup emails were sent 3/24 • 1044 notices sent to institutions that haven’t done anything on any spring survey, including EF • 2340 notices sent to institutions who have started/finished EF, but have no data in any other spring survey
Winter 2003-04 • Opened after Thanksgiving • Extended 4 days due to weather
Fall 2003 • CIP notes • 4240 institutions reported 1990 CIPs • 2330 institutions reported CIP:2000 • All C data were migrated as CIP:2000 • If an old CIP walked to 2+ new CIPs, we created xx.xx88
How CIP conversion works 1990CIP data CIP2000 data Collection System Migration PAS CIP2000 data
PY Revision System • New this year • Survey data submitted in 2002-03 can be revised • Surveys not submitted last year can be submitted • FSA strongly encouraged institutions that had been fined or warned last year to submit PY data as well as CY data this year • Parallel collection periods
PY Revision System • How many institutions used the PY system? • C = 185 • EAP = 102 • S = 60 • SA = 52 • Remember, IC was not available
Data Validity Study • New project will look at data in PY revision system • Assess reliability and validity of data collected in 2002-03 • Compare with outside sources • Look at imputations
2002-03 Noncompliance Two rounds of fines imposed • Group 1 – 13 schools missed surveys in more than one collection period • Group 2 – 65 schools failed to respond to one or more surveys in one collection About 350 warning letters sent
Fines Withdrawn • Of the 78 institutions fined, FSA withdrew 9 because • Combined reports were submitted and NCES/IPEDS was not informed • Branch or other entity closed or was sold to another institution (thus reporting responsibility shifted)
Fall 2002Compliance Update • Missing 2002 Completions data • 187 institutions were total NR • 1 submitted partial data • In Fall 2003, institutions could use Prior Year Data Revision System to enter missing data • 120 entered and locked • 6 entered data but didn’t lock • 51 remained nonrespondents • 11 lost eligibility/closed/merged
Fall 2002 Compliance Update • Missing 2002 IC (Price) data • 49 institutions were total NR • 26 submitted partial data • In Fall 2003, institutions could provide these data with their 2003 response (in the 2002-03 column) • 28 provided complete data • 25 entered partial data (no off-campus) • 8 remained nonrespondents • 5 were found N/A (not applicable) • 9 lost eligibility/closed/merged
