1 / 29

Sub-Nyquist Sampling and Identification of LTV Systems

Sub-Nyquist Sampling and Identification of LTV Systems. Yonina Eldar Department of Electrical Engineering Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Electrical Engineering and Statistics at Stanford. http:// www.ee.technion.ac.il/people/YoninaEldar yonina@ee.technion.ac.il.

andren
Télécharger la présentation

Sub-Nyquist Sampling and Identification of LTV Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sub-Nyquist Sampling and Identification of LTV Systems Yonina Eldar Department of Electrical Engineering Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Electrical Engineering and Statistics at Stanford http://www.ee.technion.ac.il/people/YoninaEldar yonina@ee.technion.ac.il Joint Work with Waheed Bajwa (Duke University) and Kfir Gedalyahu (Technion)

  2. Summary Identify LTV systems from a single output using minimal resources exploiting the connection with sub-Nyquist sampling x(t) LTV system y(t)=H(x(t)) • Analog compressed sensing: Xampling • LTV system identification • Application to super-resolution radar • Real-world issues

  3. Compressed Sensing • Explosion of interest in the idea of CS: Recover a vector x from a small number of measurements y=Ax • Many beautiful papers covering theory, algorithms, and applications

  4. Analog Compressed Sensing Can we use these ideas to build new sub-Nyquist A/D converters? Prior work: Yu et. al., Ragheb et. al., Tropp et. al. Analog CS analog signal x(t) ? RF hardware need to recover analog input or specific data (demodulation) Standard CS vector x few nonzero values random/det. matrix convex optimization greedy methods Input Sparsity Measurement Recovery

  5. Sampling/Compressed Sensing • One approach to treating continuous-time signals within the CS framework is via discretization • Thomas and Ali discussed at length this morning in thier beautiful talks! • Alternative: Use more standard sampling techniques to convert the signal from analog to digital and then rely on CS methods in the digital domain (Xampling = CS + Sampling) • Possible benefits: Simple hardware, compatibility with existing methods, smaller size digital problems • Possible drawbacks: SNR sensitivities • Can we tie the two worlds together?

  6. Signal Models (Mishali and Eldar, 08-10) Unknown delays • Applications: multipath communication channels, • ultrawideband, radar, bio-imaging (ultrasound) …. • More general abstract frameworks – Union of subspaces Unknown pulse shape Unknown carriers degrees of freedom per time unit

  7. Streams of Pulses degrees of freedom per time unit • Special case of Finite Rate of Innovation (FRI) signals (Vetterli , Marziliano& Blu) • Minimal sampling rate – the rate of innovation: • Previous work: • The rate of innovation is not achieved • Pulse shape often limited to diracs • Unstable for high model orders (Dragotti, Vetterli & Blu) (Kusuma & Goyal, Seelamantula & Unser) • Alternative approach based on discretization and CS (Herman and Strohmer)

  8. Sampling Stage: Stream of Pulses (Gedalyahu and Eldar 09-10) Serial-to-Parallel • The analog sampling filter “smoothes” the input signal : • Allows sampling of short-length pulses at low rate • CS interpretation: each sample is a linear combination of the signal’s values. • The digital correction filter-bank: • Removes the pulse and sampling kernel effects • Samples at its output satisfy: • The delays can be recovered using ESPRIT as long as

  9. What Happens When There is Noise? • If the transmitted pulse is “flat” then effectively after sampling we obtain • Can use known methods for ESPRIT with noise • In our case an advantage is that we can accumulate several values of n so as to increase robustness • Systematic study of noise effects: work in progress (Ben-Haim, Michaeli, Eldar 10) • Develop Cramer-Rao bounds under no assumptions on the delays and amplitudes for a given rate independent of sampling method • Examine various methods in light of the bound

  10. What Happens When There is Noise?

  11. Robustness in the Presence of Noise • Proposed scheme: • Mix & integrate • Take linear combinations • from which Fourier coeff. • can be obtained Fourier coeff. vector Samples Gedalyahu, Tur & Eldar (2010) • Supports general pulse shapes (time limited) • Operates at the rate of innovation • Stable in the presence of noise – achieves the Cramer-Rao bound • Practical implementation based on the MWC

  12. Xampling: Sub-Nyquist Sampling (Mishali and Eldar, 08-10) • Sub-Nyquist sampler in hardware • Combines analog preprocessing with digital post processing • Supporting theory proves the concept and robustness for a variety of applications including multiband signals • Allows time delay recovery from low-rate samples (Gedalyahu and Eldar 09-10) • Applications to ultrasound (Tur and Eldar 09)

  13. Online Demonstrations • GUI package of the MWC • Video recording of sub-Nyquist sampling + carrier recovery in lab

  14. Degrees of Freedom • Low rate sampling means the signal can be represented using fewer degrees of freedom • The Xampling framework implies that many analog signals have fewer DOF than previously assumed by Nyquist-rate sampling • Can these ideas be exploited to characterize fundamental limits in other areas? • Today: Applications to linear time-varying (LTV) system identification Sub-Nyquist sampling of pulse streams can be used to identify LTV systems using low time-bandwidth product

  15. Outline Identify LTV systems from a single output using minimal resources x(t) LTV system y(t)=H(x(t)) • Previous results • Channel model: Structured LTV channel • Algorithm for system identification • Application to super-resolution radar

  16. LTV Systems • Many physical systems can be described as linear and time-varying • Identifying LTV systems can be of great importance in applications: • Improving BER in communications • Integral part of system operation (radar or sonar) Examples: • Multipath identification LTV system K targets LTV channel propagation paths Probing signal pulses per period Received signal

  17. LTV Systems • Any LTV system can be written as (Kailath 62, Bello 63) delay-Doppler spreading function • Assumption: • Underspread systems • (more generally the footprint in the delay-Doppler space has area less than 1) • Typical in communications (Hashemi 93):

  18. Theorem (Kailath 62, Bello 63, Kozek and Pfander 05): System Identification • Probe the system with a known input x(t) LTV system y(t)=H(x(t)) • Identify thesystem from H(x(t)) i.e. recover the spreading function • Difficulties: • Proposed algorithms require inputs with infinite bandwidth W and • infinite time support T • W – System resources, T – Time to identify targets Can we identify a class of LTV systems with finite WT?

  19. Structured LTV Systems • Problem: minimize WT and provide concrete recovery method • Solution: Add structure to the problem Finite number of delays and Dopplers: • Examples: • Multipath fading: finite number of paths between Tx and Rx • Target identification in radar and sonar: Finite number of targets Goal: Minimize WT for identifying

  20. Theorem (Bajwa, Gedalyahu and Eldar 10): Main Identification Result • Probing pulse: WT is proportional only to the number of unknowns!

  21. Implications • Without noise: Infinite resolution with finite resources • Performance degrades gracefully in the presence of noise up to a threshold • Low bandwidth allows for recovery from low-rate samples • Low time allows quick identification • Efficient hardware implementation and simple recovery • Application: • Super-resolution radar from low-rate samples and fast varying targets

  22. Super-resolution Radar • Main tasks in radar target detection: • Disambiguate between multiple targets, even if they have similar velocities and range (super-resolution) • Identify targets using small bandwidth waveforms: helps • in interference avoidance and sampling (bandwidth) • Identify targets in small amount of time (time) • Matched-filtering based detection: Resolution is limited by time and bandwidth of the radar waveform (Woodward’s ambiguity function) • CS radar (Herman and Strohmer 09): assumes discretized grid • Proposed Method: No grid assumptions and characterization of the relationship between WT and number of targets

  23. Super-resolution Radar • Setup • Nine targets • Max. delay = 10 micro secs • Max. Doppler = 10 kHz • W = 1.2 MHz • T = 0.48 milli secs • N = 48 pulses in x(t) • Sequence = random binary

  24. Behavior With Noise • Setup: Estimation of nine delay-Doppler pairs (targets) • Time-Bandwidth Product = 5 times oversampling of the noiseless limit • Observations • Performance degrades gracefully in the presence of noise • Doppler estimation has higher MSE due to two-step recovery

  25. Main Tools • The results and recovery method rely on sub-Nyquist methods for • streams of pulses (Gedalyahu and Eldar 09): • Such signals can be recovered from the output of a LPF with • Allows to reduce the bandwidth W of the probing signal • The doppler shifts can be recovered from using DOA methods by exploiting the structure of the probing signal: reduces time Combining sub-Nyquist sampling with DOA methods leads to identifiability results and recovery techniques

  26. Conclusion • Parametric LTV systems can be identified using finite WT • Concrete polynomial time recovery method • Uses ideas from sub-Nyquist sampling: Efficient hardware • Super-resolution radar: no restrictions on delays and Dopplers when the noise is not too high Sub-Nyquist methods have the potential to lead to interesting results in related areas More details in: W. U. Bajwa, K. Gedalyahu and Y. C. Eldar, "Identification of Parametric Underspread Linear Systems and Super-Resolution Radar,“ to appear in IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc.

  27. ~ ~ ~ ~ Next Step • Can we combine analog sampling methods with CS on the digital side to improve robustness? • Can be done e.g. in the multiband problem • Extend to radar problem

  28. References • M. Mishali and Y. C. Eldar, “Blind multiband signal reconstruction: Compressed sensing for analog signals,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 57, pp. 993–1009, Mar. 2009. • M. Mishali and Y. C. Eldar, “From theory to practice: sub-Nyquist sampling of sparse wideband analog signals,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics on Signal Processing, vol. 4, pp. 375-391, April 2010. • M. Mishali, Y. C. Eldar, O. Dounaevsky and E. Shoshan, " Xampling: Analog to Digital at Sub-Nyquist Rates," to appear in IET. • K. Gedalyahu and Y. C. Eldar, "Time-Delay Estimation From Low-Rate Samples: A Union of Subspaces Approach," IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 3017–3031, June 2010. • R. Tur, Y. C. Eldar and Z. Friedman, "Low Rate Sampling of Pulse Streams with Application to Ultrasound Imaging," to appear in IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing. • K. Gedalyahu, R. Tur and Y. C. Eldar, "Multichannel Sampling of Pulse Streams at the Rate of Innovation," to appear in IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing.

  29. Thank you

More Related