1 / 10

U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science. OECM Limited-External Independent Review of the Linac Coherent Light Source. Hanley Lee Federal Project Director DOE Stanford Site Office October 9, 2007. Outline. Purpose of the review Project Overview

angus
Télécharger la présentation

U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. U.S. Department of Energy’sOffice of Science OECM Limited-External Independent Review of the Linac Coherent Light Source Hanley Lee Federal Project Director DOE Stanford Site Office October 9, 2007

  2. Outline • Purpose of the review • Project Overview • Impacts of FY2007 continuing resolution and funding shortfall • Revised cost and schedule baseline • Risk and Contingencymanagement • Conclusion

  3. Purpose of Review • EIR based on the limited lines of inquiry • Evaluate and validate the project’s revised cost and schedule baseline • There is no change in the mission and technical performance • Recommend to OECM the reasonableness of the revised cost and schedule baseline

  4. Project Organization Under Secretary for Science Raymond Orbach Acquisition Executive Office of Basic Energy Sciences Patricia Dehmer, Director Thomas Brown, Program Manager Stanford Site Office Paul Golan, Manager Hanley Lee, FPD Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Persis Drell, Acting Director John Galayda, Project Director

  5. Project Overview 1.1 Management, Global Controls 1.1 Management, Global Controls 1.2 Injector 1.3 Linac 1.2 Injector 1.3 Linac CLOBuilding Far Experiment Hall 1.4 Undulator Far Experiment Hall Near Experiment Hall Near Experiment Hall 1.5 X-Ray Transport/Optics/Diagnostics 1.6 X-Ray Endstation Systems 1.9 Conventional Facilities

  6. Project Overview - continued • LCLS Mission • Research and development center for x-ray free electron laser (XFEL) physics in the hard x-ray regime; and • Provide a facility for the application of XFEL radiation to experimental science • To achieve the mission, LCLS scope was defined to build a free electron laser. The scope remains unchanged in the revised cost and schedule baseline. • Project is 54% complete as of July 2007 • Civil construction contract is 37% complete • Overall TEC is 58% complete • Project performance prior to FY07 was good (PARS criteria)

  7. FY2007 Continuing Resolution Impacts • Project performance degraded rapidly due to the CR and funding shortfall • Re-directed resources to evaluate impacts, re-plan activities, and prepare revised baseline – the costs for these efforts are non-recoverable. • Delayed undulator and controls activities and procurements until March 2007. • FY2007 funding shortfall cannot be restored until FY2009; re-plan Photon system activities which delays project completion to July 2010. • Reporting against the current baseline causes sharp decline in performance.

  8. Revised Cost and Schedule Baseline

  9. Risk and Contingency Management • Risk Management Process • Mature process in place used to manage project risks • Project mitigates risks (through various measures including VE) without compromising the LCLS mission and technical performance • Updated monthly • Provides the basis for cost contingency • Contingency Management • Bottoms up development by project staff based on risks • Centrally managed between LCLS Project Director and Federal Project Director • Thresholds are defined in the Project Execution Plan

  10. Conclusion • Revised cost and schedule baseline completed with adequate cost contingency and schedule float • Project mission remains unchanged • LCLS mission will be achieved with the revised baseline • Project management systemsand processes exists and working well • Revised baseline is ready for validation

More Related