1 / 15

Panel Data Analysis Using GAUSS

Panel Data Analysis Using GAUSS. 4 Kuan-Pin Lin Portland State University. Panel Data Analysis Hypothesis Testing. Panel Data Model Specification Pool or Not To Pool Random Effects vs. Fixed Effects Heterscedasticity Time Serial Correlation Spatial Correlation.

annick
Télécharger la présentation

Panel Data Analysis Using GAUSS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Panel Data AnalysisUsing GAUSS 4 Kuan-Pin LinPortland State University

  2. Panel Data AnalysisHypothesis Testing • Panel Data Model Specification • Pool or Not To Pool • Random Effects vs. Fixed Effects • Heterscedasticity • Time Serial Correlation • Spatial Correlation

  3. Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects • Hypothesis Testing

  4. Random Effects vs. Fixed Effects • Fixed effects estimator is consistent under H0 and H1; Random effects estimator is efficient under H0, but it is inconsistent under H1. • Hausman Test Statistic

  5. Random Effects vs. Fixed Effects • Alternative Hausman Test(Mundlak Approach) • Estimate the random effects model with the group means of time variant regressors: • F Test that g = 0

  6. Hypothesis Testing • Fixed Effects Model • Random Effects Model

  7. Heteroscedasticity • The Null Hypothesis • Based on the auxiliary regression • LM test statistic is NR2 ~ 2(K), N is total number of observation (i,t)s.

  8. Cross Sectional Correlation • The Null Hypothesis • Based on the estimated correlation coefficients • Breusch-Pagan LM Test (Breusch, 1980) • As T  ∞ (N fixed)

  9. Cross Sectional Correlation • Bias adjusted Breusch-Pagan LM Test (Pesaran, et.al. 2008)

  10. Time Serial Correlation • The Model and Null Hypothesis • LM Test Statistic

  11. Joint Hypothesis TestingRandom Effects and Time Serial Correlation • The Model • Joint Test for AR(1) and Random Effects

  12. Joint Hypothesis TestingRandom Effects and Time Serial Correlation • Based on OLS residuals :

  13. Joint Hypothesis TestingRandom Effects and Time Serial Correlation • Marginal Tests for AR(1) & Random Effects • Robust Test for AR(1) & Random Effects • Joint Test Equivalence

  14. Panel Data AnalysisExtensions • Seeming Unrelated Regression • Allowing Cross-Equation Dependence • Fixed Coefficients Model • Dynamic Panel Data Analysis • Using FD Specification • IV and GMM Methods • Spatial Panel Data Analysis • Using Spatial Weights Matrix • Spatial Lag and Spatial Error Models

  15. References • Baltagi, B., Li, Q. (1995) Testing AR(1) against MA(1) disturbances in an error component model. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 133-151. • Baltagi, B., Bresson, G., Pirotte, A. (2006) Joint LM test for homoscedasticity in a one-way error component model. Journal of Econometrics, 134, 401-417. • Bera, A.K., W. Sosa-Escudero and M. Yoon (2001), Tests for the error component model in the presence of local misspecification, Journal of Econometrics 101, 1–23. • Breusch, T.S. and A.R. Pagan (1980), The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics, Review of Economic Studies 47, 239–253. • Pesaran, M.H. (2004), General diagnostic tests for cross-section dependence in panels, Working Paper, Trinity College, Cambridge. • Pesaran, M.H., Ullah, A. and Yamagata, T. (2008), A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence, The Econometrics Journal,11, 105–127.

More Related