TAU Parallel Performance System

1. TAU Parallel Performance System Allen D. Malony, Sameer S. Shende, Robert BellKai Li, Li Li, Kevin Huck, Nick Trebon {malony,sameer,bertie,likai,lili,khuck}@cs.uoregon.edu Department of Computer and Information Science Performance Research Laboratory University of Oregon

2. Outline • Motivation • TAU architecture and toolkit • Instrumentation • Measurement • Analysis • Example applications • Users of TAU • Conclusion

3. Problem Domain • ASCI defines leading edge parallel systems and software • Large-scale systems and heterogeneous platforms • Multi-model simulation • Complex, multi-layered software integration • Multi-language programming • Mixed-model parallelism • Complexity challenges performance analysis tools • System diversity demands tool portability • Need for cross- and multi-language support • Coverage of alternative parallel computation models • Operate at scale

4. PerformanceTuning PerformanceTechnology hypotheses Performance Diagnosis • Experimentmanagement • Performancedatabase PerformanceTechnology properties Performance Experimentation • Instrumentation • Measurement • Analysis • Visualization characterization Performance Observation Tools for Performance Problem Solving • Empirical-based performance optimization process • Understand performance technology concerns

5. TAU Performance System • Tuning and Analysis Utilities (11+ year project effort) • Performance system framework for scalable parallel and distributed high-performance computing • Targets a general complex system computation model • Entities: nodes / contexts / threads • Multi-level: system / software / parallelism • Measurement and analysis abstraction • Integrated toolkit for performance instrumentation, measurement, analysis, and visualization • Portable performance profiling and tracing facility • Open software approach with technology integration • University of Oregon , Forschungszentrum Jülich, LANL

6. TAU Performance Systems Goals • Multi-level performance instrumentation • Multi-language automatic source instrumentation • Flexible and configurable performance measurement • Widely-ported parallel performance profiling system • Computer system architectures and operating systems • Different programming languages and compilers • Support for multiple parallel programming paradigms • Multi-threading, message passing, mixed-mode, hybrid • Support for performance mapping • Support for object-oriented and generic programming • Integration in complex software systems and applications

7. General Complex System Computation Model • Node:physically distinct shared memory machine • Message passing node interconnection network • Context: distinct virtual memory space within node • Thread: execution threads (user/system) in context Interconnection Network Inter-node messagecommunication * * Node Node Node node memory memory memory SMP physicalview VM space … modelview … Context Threads

8. Paraver EPILOG TAU Performance System Architecture ParaProf

9. TAU Instrumentation Approach • Support for standard program events • Routines • Classes and templates • Statement-level blocks • Support for user-defined events • Begin/End events (“user-defined timers”) • Atomic events • Selection of event statistics • Support definition of “semantic” entities for mapping • Support for event groups • Instrumentation optimization

10. TAU Instrumentation • Flexible instrumentation mechanisms at multiple levels • Source code • manual • automatic • C, C++, F77/90/95 (Program Database Toolkit (PDT)) • OpenMP (directive rewriting (Opari), POMP spec) • Object code • pre-instrumented libraries (e.g., MPI using PMPI) • statically-linked and dynamically-loaded (e.g., Python) • Executable code • dynamic instrumentation (pre-execution) (DynInstAPI) • virtual machine instrumentation (e.g., Java using JVMPI)

11. TAU Source Instrumentation • Automatic source instrumentation (TAUinstr) • Routine entry/exit and class method entry/exit • Block entry/exit and statement level (to be added) • Uses an instrumentation specification file • Include/exclude list for events and files • Uses command line options for group selection • Instrumentation event selection (TAUselect) • Automatic generation of instrumentation specification file • Instrumentation language to describe event constraints • Event identity and location • Event performance properties (e.g., overhead analysis) • Create TAUselect scripts for performance experiments

12. Program Database Toolkit (PDT) • Program code analysis framework • develop source-based tools • High-level interface to source code information • Integrated toolkit for source code parsing, database creation, and database query • Commercial grade front-end parsers • Portable IL analyzer, database format, and access API • Open software approach for tool development • Multiple source languages • Implement automatic performance instrumentation tools • tau_instrumentor

13. Program Database Toolkit (PDT) Application / Library C / C++ parser Fortran parser F77/90/95 Program documentation PDBhtml Application component glue IL IL SILOON C / C++ IL analyzer Fortran IL analyzer C++ / F90/95 interoperability CHASM Program Database Files Automatic source instrumentation TAU_instr DUCTAPE

14. PDT 3.0 Functionality • C++ statement-level information implementation • for, while loops, declarations, initialization, assignment… • PDB records defined for most constructs • DUCTAPE • Processes PDB 1.x, 2.x, 3.x uniformly • PDT applications • XMLgen • PDB to XML converter (Sottile) • Used for CHASM and CCA tools • PDBstmt • Statement callgraph display tool

15. PDT 3.0 Functionality (continued) • Cleanscape Flint parser fully integrated for F90/95 • Flint parser is very robust • Produces PDB records for TAU instrumentation (stage 1) • Linux x86, HP Tru64, IBM AIX • Tested on SAGE, POP, ESMF, PET benchmarking codes • Full PDB 2.0 specification (stage 2) [Q1 ‘04] • Statement level support (stage 3) [Q3 ‘04] • PDT 3.0 release at SC2003

16. TAU Performance Measurement • TAU supports profiling and tracing measurement • Robust timing and hardware performance support • Support for online performance monitoring • Profile and trace performance data export to file system • Selective exporting • Extension of TAU measurement for multiple counters • Creation of user-defined TAU counters • Access to system-level metrics • Support for callpath measurement • Integration with system-level performance data • Linux MAGNET/MUSE (Wu Feng, LANL)

17. TAU Measurement with Multiple Counters • Extend event measurement to capture multiple metrics • Begin/end (interval) events • User-defined (atomic) events • Multiple performance data sources can be queried • Associate counter function list to event • Defined statically or dynamically • Different counter sources • Timers and hardware counters • User-defined counters (application specified) • System-level counters • Monotonically increasing required for begin/end events • Extend user-defined counters to system-level counter

18. Performance Analysis and Visualization • Analysis of parallel profile and trace measurement • Parallel profile analysis • ParaProf • ParaVis • Profile generation from trace data • Performance database framework (PerfDBF) • Parallel trace analysis • Translation to VTF 3.0 and EPILOG • Integration with VNG (Technical University of Dresden) • Online parallel analysis and visualization

19. ParaProf Framework Architecture • Portable, extensible, and scalable tool for profile analysis • Try to offer “best of breed” capabilities to analysts • Build as profile analysis framework for extensibility

20. Profile Manager Window

21. Pprof Output (NAS Parallel Benchmark – LU) • Intel QuadPIII Xeon • F90 + MPICH • Profile - Node - Context - Thread • Events - code - MPI

22. ParaProf (NAS Parallel Benchmark – LU) Routine profile across all nodes node,context, thread Global profiles Event legend Individual profile

23. TAU + Vampir (NAS Parallel Benchmark – LU) Callgraph display Timeline display Parallelism display Communications display

24. Case Study: SAMRAI (LLNL) • Structured Adaptive Mesh Refinement Application Infrastructure (SAMRAI) • Programming • C++ and MPI • SPMD • Instrumentation • PDT for automatic instrumentation of routines • MPI interposition wrappers • SAMRAI timers for interesting code segments • timers classified in groups (apps, mesh, …) • timer groups are managed by TAU groups

25. Full Profile Window (Exclusive Time) 512 processes

26. Node / Context / Thread Profile Window

27. Derived Metrics

28. Full Profile Window (Metric-specific) 512 processes

29. ParaProf Enhancements • Readers completely separated from the GUI • Access to performance profile database • Profile translators • mpiP, papiprof, dynaprof • Callgraph display • prof/gprof style with hyperlinks • Integration of 3D performance plotting library • Scalable profile analysis • Statistical histograms, cluster analysis, … • Generalized programmable analysis engine • Cross-experiment analysis

30. ParaVis • Scalable parallel profile analysis • Scalable performance displays • 3D graphics • Analysis across profile samples • Allow for runtime use • Animated / interactive visualization • Initially develop with SCIRun • Computational environment • Performance graphics toolkit • Portable plotting library • OpenGL Performance Visualizer Performance Analyzer Performance Data Reader

31. Performance Visualization in SCIRun SCIRun program EVH1, IBM EVH1, Linux IA-32

32. “Terrain” Visualization (Full profile) F Uintah

33. “Scatterplot” Visualization • Each pointcoordinatedeterminedby threevalues: MPI_Reduce MPI_Recv MPI_Waitsome • Min/Maxvalue range • Effective forclusteranalysis Uintah

34. “Bargraph” Visualization (MPI routines) Uintah, 512 processes, ASCI Blue Pacific

35. Performanceanalysis programs Raw performance data Other tools Performance data description Performance analysis and query toolkit PerfDML translators ORDB PostgreSQL . . . PerfDB TAU Performance Database Framework • profile data only • XML representation • project / experiment / trial

36. PerfDBF Browser

37. PerfDBF Cross-Trial Analysis

38. TAU Performance System Status • Computing platforms (selected) • IBM SP / pSeries, SGI Origin 2K/3K, Cray T3E / SV-1 / X1, HP (Compaq) SC (Tru64), Sun, Hitachi SR8000, NEC SX-5/6, Linux clusters (IA-32/64, Alpha, PPC, PA-RISC, Power, Opteron), Apple (G4/5, OS X), Windows • Programming languages • C, C++, Fortran 77/90/95, HPF, Java, OpenMP, Python • Thread libraries • pthreads, SGI sproc, Java,Windows, OpenMP • Compilers (selected) • Intel KAI (KCC, KAP/Pro), PGI, GNU, Fujitsu, Sun, Microsoft, SGI, Cray, IBM (xlc, xlf), Compaq, NEC, Intel

39. Selected Applications of TAU • Center for Simulation of Accidental Fires and Explosion • University of Utah, ASCI ASAP Center, C-SAFE • Uintah Computational Framework (UCF) (C++) • Center for Simulation of Dynamic Response of Materials • California Institute of Technology, ASCI ASAP Center • Virtual Testshock Facility (VTF) (Python, Fortran 90) • Los Alamos National Lab • Monte Carlo transport (MCNP) (Susan Post) • Full code automatic instrumentation and profiling • ASCI Q validation and scaling • SAIC’s Adaptive Grid Eulerian (SAGE) (Jack Horner) • Fortran 90 automatic instrumentation and profiling

40. Selected Applications of TAU (continued) • Lawrence Livermore National Lab • Overturen • Radiation diffusion (KULL) • C++ automatic instrumentation, callpath profiling • Sandia National Lab • DOE CCTTSS SciDAC project • Common component architecture (CCA) integration • Combustion code (C++, Fortran 90, GrACE, MPI) • Center for Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes • University of Chicago / Argonne, ASCI ASAP Center • FLASH code (C, Fortran 90, MPI)

41. Concluding Remarks • Complex ASCI parallel systems and software pose challenging performance analysis problems that require robust methodologies and tools • To build more sophisticated performance tools, existing proven performance technology must be utilized • Performance tools must be integrated with software and systems models and technology • Performance engineered software • Function consistently and coherently in software and system environments • TAU performance system offers robust performance technology that can be broadly integrated

42. Acknowledgements • Department of Energy (DOE) • MICS office • DOE 2000 ACTS contract • “Performance Technology for Tera-class Parallel Computer Systems: Evolution of the TAU Performance System” • “Performance Analysis of Parallel Component Software” • University of Utah, DOE ASCI Level 1 sub-contract • DOE ASCI Level 3 (LANL, LLNL) • NSF National Young Investigator (NYI) award • Research Centre Juelich • John von Neumann Institute for Computing • Dr. Bernd Mohr • Los Alamos National Laboratory