1 / 10

The Effect of Culture on Risk Perception, Hazard Mitigation, and Warning Response

The Effect of Culture on Risk Perception, Hazard Mitigation, and Warning Response. Ashley Coles University of Arizona. Warnings must be…. Heard Understood What is happening, time, how to prepare Believed Warning is true, danger is imminent Personalized

asis
Télécharger la présentation

The Effect of Culture on Risk Perception, Hazard Mitigation, and Warning Response

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Effect of Culture on Risk Perception, Hazard Mitigation, and Warning Response Ashley Coles University of Arizona

  2. Warnings must be… • Heard • Understood • What is happening, time, how to prepare • Believed • Warning is true, danger is imminent • Personalized • Risk to self or property is perceived • Responded to Mileti, 1995

  3. Culture? • Hazards research tends to focus on prediction and prevention of events, rather than why people are vulnerable in the first place • Cultural factors affect ALL stages of warning response

  4. Main cultural factors • Trust and blame • Science, government • Incorporation • Extent of social networks • Self (and community) efficacy • Locus of control – internal vs. external • Autonomy • Social roles • Time view • Looking to past, present, or future

  5. Mary Douglas: Risk and Blame Individualist/Market Sect/Enclave Autonomy  Isolate Incorporation Hierarchy/Bureaucracy

  6. Individualist/Market • Competitive market-style science • Conflicting conclusions lead to mistrust of science behind warnings • Value private freedom, resent restrictions on behavior • Smaller social networks • Focus on present • High self-efficacy • Can be good or bad

  7. Hierarchy/Bureaucracy • Trust established science, less open to new ideas • Trust authority figures • More specific social roles • Focus on the past • Self-central view of decision-making

  8. Sect/Enclave • Trust only those within group • Extensive social networks • Equal or fairly equal social roles • Focused on future • Efficacy depends on how group formed • Voluntary – high • Involuntary – low

  9. Isolates • Trust no one • No social networks • Low self-efficacy • Perceive threats, but too fatalistic to take action or precaution …a lost cause?

  10. Your ideas? • Comments on theory • How to test this theory • How to make it useful in practice for YOU • Especially NWS and emergency managers

More Related