1 / 9

Simulation methodology

Simulation methodology. Embedded-atom method potential for the Cu-Ag system (Mishin at al.)

betsy
Télécharger la présentation

Simulation methodology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Simulation methodology • Embedded-atom method potential for the Cu-Ag system (Mishin at al.) • Simulation block is constructed by joining together Cu and Ag single crystals with the same orientation. The conic tip was obtained by removing all atoms of the upper crystal (Ag) outside of the cone given geometry (radius of the contact area is ~15A). Size of the block: 77 x 85 x 71 A (total atoms: 27,198; dynamic atoms: 4,254 Ag-tip, 10,560 Cu-substrate) with periodic boundary conditions in the substrate plane (XZ-plane). • Relaxation at 10K during 0.1 ns • Slip studies: V=1 m/s, sim. time 2 ns; V=5 m/s, sim. time 1 ns. All runs are at 10K. • Stress tensor calculated using the virial expression for the dynamics atoms of the substrate. • Interface structure examined by the common-neighbor analysis • No loading force applied

  2. Y (1 1 1) X (1 0 -1) Z (1 -2 1) V Ag (fixed) Ag (dynamic) Cu (dynamic) Cu (fixed)

  3. Actual tip displacements vs. imposed tip displacement Actual tip displacements are calculated as the displacement of the “center of mass” of atoms of the bottom layer of the tip Slip?

  4. Stresses in the tip Stresses are calculated using the standard virial expression over all dynamic atoms of the tip Shear components Normal components

  5. Displacements of the tip and shear stresses “1” “0” “1” “0”

  6. Geometric registry at the tip (Ag) – substrate (Cu) interface XY-projection Ag A FCC stackingsequence in Ag B C Top layer ofthe substrate Cu Y (1 1 1) X (1 0 -1) Z (1 -2 1)

  7. X (1 0 -1) Z (1 -2 1) Atomic registry at the tip (Ag) – substrate (Cu) interface FCC registry Black triangles shoe groups of atoms of the substrate,which are in FCC registry (ABC) with the atoms of the tip. Only the atoms of the top layer of the substrate (golden)and A-layer of the tip (blue) are shown. HCP registry Red triangles shoe groups of atoms of the substrate,which are in HCP registry (BC) with the atoms of the tip. Only the atoms of the top layer of the substrate (golden)and B-layer of the tip (blue) are shown. Contact area

  8. X (1 0 -1) Z (1 -2 1) Atomic registry at the tip (Ag) – substrate (Cu) interface. Contd. Only the top layer of the substrate (golden atoms) is shown. Atomic rows of the substratewhich are not inregistry with the tip Lattices mismatchdislocations We do not need to create them.They pre-exist due to latticemismatch between Ag and Cu. FCC HCP FCC FCC HCP HCP

  9. Atomic registry at the tip (Ag) – substrate (Cu) interface. Common-neighbors analysis http://www.physics.gmu.edu/~vivanov/afm/cuag/movies/agcu_1ms_2ns_10K_noforce.mpeg “0” HCP “1”

More Related