1 / 46

Chapter 7

Chapter 7. Managing Emerging Technologies. Emerging Technologies. Relative term – different for companies Life Cycle Emerging technology – innovation and is still developing; not yet accepted as a technology that will be useful, usable, cost effective or viable substitute

beulah
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 7

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 7 Managing Emerging Technologies

  2. Emerging Technologies • Relative term – different for companies • Life Cycle • Emerging technology – innovation and is still developing; not yet accepted as a technology that will be useful, usable, cost effective or viable substitute • Pacing technology – beginning to grow in acceptance; has benefits that exceed cost or competitive advantage; multiple companies use

  3. Life cycle continued • Key technology – provides a competitive differential – drives/enables business and allows company to be more successful than its competitors • Base technology – required for the company in order to remain viable in marketplace

  4. Adopting technology • View adopting technology from the implementer’s point of view – categories are: • Innovators – willing to take higher risk, “deeper pockets”, or experience in evaluating/ piloting projects; be careful of embracing technology “for technology’s sake” – during emerging phase • Early adopters – more visionary, some assurance for potential returns, but not widespread – emerging or pacing phases

  5. Categories continued • Early majority – wait until more assurance for success – other competitors are already using this – only pacing phase • Late majority – have to adopt to stay competitive, conservative who prefer low risk or low investment capability – key status • Laggards – true skeptics, already base technology and have to adopt to stay in the market – implementation might be greater than benefit

  6. Moore’s catagories • Geoffrey Moore calls these 5: • Technology enthusiasts • Visionaries • Pragmatists • Conservatives • Skeptics

  7. Other similar models • Geoffrey Moore – supplier’s model • Early market – great excitement where customers are enthusiasts and visionaries • The Chasm – early market interest isn’t showing needed benefits • Bowling Alley – niche-based adoption in advance of general marketplace – vendors will create niche-specific whole products

  8. Supplier’s model continued • The Tornado – mass-market adoption where general marketplace switches over to the new • Main Street – aftermarket development • End of life – can come all too soon driving price/performance to new levels where wholly new paradigms come to market and supplant the leaders who themselves had only just arrives

  9. Competitive advantage • If don’t keep pace with technology • 58% say loss of competitive edge • 16% say increased cost of production • 13% say would not be in business • 7% say would have lack of control in running the business • 3% say other reasons • 3% say would not happen to them

  10. Strategies for Technology Development Innovator Early Late Maj Laggards Emphasis on R&D dev sys design production Couplings R&D/systems R&D/end systems/users prod/users users Technical state of art high moderate low Features R&D risk comp/intel minimize cost quick copy responsive delivery Style enthu/vis pragmatic conservative skeptics

  11. The S-Curve • Normal distribution for adoption of technologies • S-curve describes cumulative adoption • Technologies overlap – sunsetting • Few adoptions • Take-off point • Majority have accepted

  12. Managing S-Curve Change • Initial phase – IT/business needs to build awareness of emerging technology – select experts for the new technology • Early & late majority – more people need to be skilled in technology; affects more people; users & supporters need to be “invited” to embrace the new technology

  13. Managing S-curve continued • Base technology – must adopt the technology, change becomes requirement; shift from persuasion & encouragement to more direct adoption methods • Need to look at incremental and discontinuous change • Discontinuous change needs to come from the CEO or high level management

  14. Discontinuous • Paradigm shock – effect experienced by end users or the infrastructure supporting them – greater impact on stakeholders relative to newness the greater the paradigm shock - inhibitor • Application breakthrough – result of dramatic changes in roles of end user technologies – significant returns from investment – driver of adoption of new technologies

  15. Learning along the S-Curve • Early phase – people knowledgeable small • Growth phases – more and more people need to know technology • Obsolescence phase – decline in people knowledge as people more on to new technology (risk that pool of available knowledge will decline faster than technology’s use – contributes to rise of cost)

  16. Strategy and the S-Curve • Innovators & early adopters – play a greater role in shaping the subsequent use of technology – also organizations who help shape the future will be great influence in driving marketplace • Early majority – respond to environment; flexible to adapt to circumstances, yet avoid risks for adopting too soon

  17. Strategy continued • Late majority & laggards – maintain strategic posture where investments made as late as possible – avoid risk; but possible risk is getting into the game too late

  18. Roger’s Innovation Diffusion • Diffusion – process by which an innovation is communicated, over time, through certain channels to members of a social system • 5 characteristics of rate of adoption • Relative advantage – degree to which technology appears to be better over current one • Compatibility – values & needs of adopters • Complexity – hard to use or learn – slow adoption

  19. Diffusion continued • Trialability – technology that can be experimented with better change of adoption • Observability – technology can be “seen” by other users will affect rate of adoption • This method doesn’t take into account management, nor organizational influences, knowledge issues and interdependencies

  20. Fichman & Kemerer • Economics of Technology standards • 3 primary sources of increasing returns to adoption • Learning by using – increase in benefits to users • Positive network externalities – benefits brought on by numbers of users • Interrelatedness – compatible products makes for a larger base of adopters

  21. Knowledge barrier • Organizations who become early adopters have several characteristics: • An ability to amortize the cost of learning • An ability to acquire any given amount of new knowledge with less effort • A higher level of initial knowledge about a given technology

  22. Acquisition • Acquisition of a technology does not necessarily equate to implementation • Lag between acquisition of aproduct and its actual implementation is the assimilation gap

  23. Identification of Emerging Technologies • What Can Happen? - comes from R&D, inventors, or convergence of existing technologies – companies need to stay current with vendors and what is “happening” • What Will Happen? – economics must be looked at to see if technology is viable and producable

  24. Emergence continued • What Should Happen? – after looking at science, engineering and economics, also look at social, political and ethical issues (cloning); also even if technology effective – might not become standard (Betamax) • How Will It Happen? – implementation & evaluating of emerging technologies • **Need to identify the application

  25. Inhibitors to Embracing Technologies • Delayed participation – managers have mental model of business – need to have longer-term outlook on potential of emerging technologies • Sticking with familiar – technology similar with past successes – favored bias • Reluctance to fully commit – half-hearted based on competing forces in company

  26. Inhibitors continued • Lack of persistence – unwillingness of organization to endure trials of implementing technologies that have high risk • The Establishment – industry outsiders have little to lose in pursuing radical innovations – most companies have infrastructure and large investments – little incentive for radical change

  27. Factors that Slow Adoption • The offering does not provide substantial performance advantages over current solutions • Target customers are currently quite satisfied with current solutions • Those customers who will benefit most from the offering do not control the purchasing decision

  28. Factors continued • The final offering needs to undergo a significant regulatory approval process • The customer’s perception of value will be dependent on the backing of other parties • The sale of the product will depend on the efforts and resources of other parties, such as distributors

  29. Factors continued • Adoption of the offering will require users, customers, or distributors to change expensive embedded systems • Target markets will have to be educated in how to use the offering • Target markets will have to radically change their usage patterns • The technical standards in this industry are not yet clearly set

  30. Factors continued • The purchasing decision will be risky for target customers • Significant sales are unlikely until a critical mass of products is in use • Infrastructure or technology must be developed in parallel to get the offering to the market

  31. Human Resource Considerations • Availability of talent • Resource allocation • Motivation • Knowledge management

  32. Technology Scanning • Books & periodicals • Formal studies (interviews, surveys, scenario planning, on-site observations) • Personal contacts/networking • Professional organizations, workshops, conventions • R&D organizations

  33. Scanning continued • State & federal departments • Universities • Vendors and consultants • Early adopters • **in addition – technology forecasting for general future trends should be done

  34. Factors Affecting Successful Introduction of Technologies • Identify the problem and opportunity that technology addresses – business linkage and value – need a sponsor for implementation • Identify and empower a champion • Create a cross-functional, dedicated and accountable team • Build an environment that will support the technology

  35. Successful introduction continued • Identify and address the risks associated with the new technology • Manage the project – set reasonable goals and schedules; develop standards for abandoning the project

  36. Technology Assessment Process • Scoping – capabilities of firm and potential threat or opportunity from the technology • Searching – screen technologies and search for signs of emerging technologies and determine if they have commercial viability • Evaluating – identifying and prioritizing technologies that are considered viable

  37. Process continued • Committing – considers how it should be pursued and implemented – technologies that reach this stage are considered viable with the potential to provide some level of advantage

  38. Managing Checklists • How to sell new technologies to executives • Focus on business solution to a problem • Identify value to the organization • Compare new technology to existing ones • Consider a range of alternative to be evaluated • Create champions throughout company • Manage expectations – clear milestones • Start small to mitigate risk

  39. Checklists continued • Look to other industries with similar models • When you are on the “bleeding edge” be sure you understand iterative/evolutionary nature of new technologies • Under-promise • Be honest when things go awry

  40. Checklists continued • How to prioritize and focus on right technology • Prototype, demo and show users technologies • Become intimate with business drivers • Understand business requirements • Highlight benefits of technology • Weigh the risks • Identify technologies that enable new business

  41. Checklists continued • Identify technologies that can be easily integrated with existing architectures • Measure the risks in the context of organization’s ability to absorb failure/success • Understand culture and fit with technology • Set aside money for changing priorities throughout the year

  42. Checklists continued • Developing the business case for emerging technologies • Identify the business need • Identify how it fits into the current business priorities • If replacing – identify areas that will be impacted • Identify benefits to and impact on bottom line • Identify cost of not pursuing technology

  43. Checklists continued • Identify the assumptions and justify them • Utilize proof of concepts/prototypes • Work with a business function collaborator • Evaluate implementation options • Evaluate fit with existing architectures • Ask for feedback from customers • Identify a project champion

  44. Lessons from the Past • Lessons from the past • “expert” predictions are fallible • Timing is relevant – iterate and review often • Which new technologies become adopted is hard to predict • Organizational consequences of adopted new technologies take a long time to become evident

  45. Rules & Laws of Technology • Bigger computers are better – computing power increases with the square of its cost • Smaller computers are better – transistor density on a manufactured semiconductor doubles about every 18 months • Connected computers are better – value of a network grows as the square of the number of its users

  46. Rules continued • Machines may leap, but programs creep – software gets slower faster than hardware gets faster • Networks will triple every year – for the foreseeable future, the total bandwidth of communications systems will triple every 12 months

More Related