SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

A Direction from COMPASS

bin avatar
bin
24 diapositives · 378 Views · Aug 15, 2013

This document explores the importance of the working alliance and client-directed outcome measures in therapy. It emphasizes that the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions is largely influenced by the client's perception of the therapy process. The findings indicate that when clients are engaged and their feedback is integrated into the treatment, outcomes improve significantly. Additionally, the paper discusses methodologies like the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) and Session Rating Scale (SRS) as tools for measuring progress and client satisfaction in therapy.

#west #south #north #east #magnetic north #southwest #northeast #southwest by west
A Direction from COMPASS - slide 1
01 / 24A Direction from COMPASS
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

A Direction from COMPASS
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. A Direction from COMPASS Creating a context for change…

  2. COMPASS and Outcomes Howard, et al. (1996) • Managing as opposed to measuring • The clinical success • A commercial failure

  3. The Working Alliance as Performance Feedback (Comerford, 2003) • Working Alliance Inventory Horvath & Greenberg, 1989 • Performance feedback • Substance Abuse Relapse Reduction System (SARRS)(Now CD) Psybermetrics, 2002 (Now Polaris Health Systems)

  4. Treatment Period Intake mean (sd) Update mean (sd) Wilcoxon signed-rank Effect Size Change Score Pre-feedback (T1 & T2) (n=60) 0.23 (0.20) 0.16 (0.17) z=-3.66, p < .001 0.39 0.07 (0.14) Post-feedback (T3 & T4) (n=66) 0.27 (0.24) 0.14 (0.16) z=-4.98, p < .001 0.63 0.13 (0.18) Total Sample (n=126) 0.25 (0.22) 0.15 (0.17) z=-6.17 , p < .001 0.52 0.11 (0.16) Mann-Whitney U z=-1.02, ns z=-0.06, ns z=-1.76, p < .05 Between Group Effect size 0.20 0.10 0.36 Table 7 Changes in total pre-feedback (T1 & T2) versus total post-feedback (T3 & T4) in SARRS psychiatric scores z=-1.76, p < .05 0.36

  5. Client Directed Outcome Informed Miller & Duncan, 2004

  6. Psychotherapy Outcomes • Client factors (40%) • Therapeutic relationship (30%) • Techniques (15%) • Placebo effect (15%) Lambert (1992) • Client Theory of Change Miller & Duncan (2004)

  7. Client Directed • Unless you develop a working alliance, nothing you do will work. • Only what the client believes counts; the “client’s theory of change.” • If the client doesn’t think it will work it probably won’t. • The client is the best judge of whether or not your doing a good job.

  8. Outcome Informed • Only the client knows if it’s working. • You don’t know if it’s working if you don’t ask. • If it’s not working more of the same won’t work. • A higher level of care is not always the answer.

  9. You haven't a clue what I’m talking about, do you?"

  10. Two Instruments • The Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) • Session Rating Scale (SRS)Miller, Duncan, 2004

  11. ORS How have you been feeling? • Individually (Personal well-being) • Interpersonally (Family, close relationships) • Socially (Work, School & Friends) • Overall (General sense of well-being)

  12. SRS How am I doing? • Relationship (Bond) • Goals and topics (Goals) • Approach or method (Task) • Overall

  13. Organizational Influences Navigating the Labyrinth

  14. Context… Drugs delivered in similar doses to comparable patients produced significantly different results attributable to the facilities where they were delivered. Feighner, Aden, Fabre, Rickels & Smith (1983) Rickes, Fisher, Park, Lipman & Mock (1966) Greenblatt, Grosser & Wechsler (1964)

  15. Staff Training and Selection • Personal qualities appear to be the factor that make some therapists more helpful than others. Luborsky, McLellan, Woody, O’Brien & Auerback (1985) Orlinsky & Howard (1980) There is no significant difference in effectiveness between professionals and paraprofessionals. Christensen & Jacobson (1994)

  16. Rethinking Systems • Outcome Building • Effectiveness • Outcome Support • Efficiency

  17. The Basic Questions… How do we: • Eliminate non-essential activities, • Make support functions more efficient, and • Increase activities that drive outcomes?

  18. Payers are asking… • What do we need to know? • What do our requirements cost? • What are we really buying? • Can we Purchase Outcomes instead of services…

  19. Every Patient carries her or his own doctor inside. Albert Schweitzer (1875-1965)

  20. Resources • www.talkingcure.com • Duncan, B. L., Miller, S. D., & Sparks, J. A. (2004). The heroic client: A revolutionary way to improve effectiveness through client-directed, outcome informed therapy. New York: Jossey-Bass. • Hubble, M. A., Ducan, B.L., & Miller, S.D. (1999). The heart & soul of change: What works in therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.