1 / 19

WGA WREZ Proposal

WGA WREZ Proposal. Doug Larson and Thomas Carr Western Interstate Energy Board SWAT Renewable Transmission Task Force Albuquerque, NM April 7, 2008. Outline of Presentation. Value added by a WREZ project Origin of proposal Western Interconnection context Overview of phases of proposal

bin
Télécharger la présentation

WGA WREZ Proposal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WGA WREZ Proposal Doug Larson and Thomas Carr Western Interstate Energy Board SWAT Renewable Transmission Task Force Albuquerque, NM April 7, 2008

  2. Outline of Presentation • Value added by a WREZ project • Origin of proposal • Western Interconnection context • Overview of phases of proposal • Best guess timeline

  3. Value Added By Project LSEs, transmission providers, generation developers, state regulators can make more informed decisions about: • Costs of renewable power; • Optimum transmission needed to move renewable power to consumers; • Potential partners in developing transmission to access renewable areas; and • Where renewable energy developers can site their facilities to ensure access to the transmission system and minimize environmental impacts.

  4. Information is essential to develop transmission because: • Outside of the CA ISO and AB, there is no mechanism in the Western Interconnection to force unwilling parties to pay for new transmission. • LSE fuel choices will ultimately determine what transmission gets built. • LSE resource planners (and regulators) often operate in stovepipes and may miss opportunities for inter-company collaboration. • Inter-company collaboration is important because transmission is a “lumpy” investment with large economies of scale. One LSE may not need all the capacity created by transmission to a REZ.

  5. A WREZ effort also… • Promotes a regional view of renewables development blunting potential balkanization of the renewables markets. This is particular important for development of renewables that are distant from load centers. • Paves way for interstate collaboration on: • Permitting of multi-state transmission; • Allocating and recovering cost of new transmission. • Could provide an informational foundation for new approaches to interconnection and transmission service queuing problems.

  6. Origin of Proposal • 6/06 WGA Clean and Diversified Energy Initiative recommendations • 9/07 WGA/NWCC/GEA renewables and transmission summit in Ft. Collins recommendation to identify WREZs the incorporate all renewable fuels (solar, geothermal, wind, biomass, hydro, hydrokenetic, etc.) • Brainstorming group to explore how Ft. Collins recommendation could be implemented (WY Gov’s office, CA PUC, NREL, DOE – OE & EERE, CEERT, Resolve, WIEB) • 10/07 WREZ briefing paper • 11/07 presentations to and sign-off from WGA Staff Council, WIEB Board, CREPC • 12/07 Governors’ proposal to Secretary Bodman for a WREZ project. • 3/08 meeting with DOE (NREL, LBNL, FERC staff, WGA chair and vice chair offices, CREPC/WIRAB chair, CA PUC, CO GEO, WGA and WIEB staff)

  7. Western Interconnection Context • Highly integrated grid • Excellent and diverse renewable resources • State-by-state REZ initiatives • Other Western Interconnection actions important to the WREZ work

  8. Context – Western Interconnection

  9. Solar Geothermal Wind Biomass Excellent and Diverse Renewable Resources Hydrokinetic

  10. State Actions Affecting Renewables • 8 states with RPS + renewable policies in BC and AB • 7 Governors, 1 Premier working on region carbon cap and trade system (which will increase pressure for more renewable development) • State-by-state REZ efforts • Texas CREZ • CO S 91 • CA Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative • AZ Black & Vetch study • NV Governor’s renewable and transmission task force • NM RETA • Other • State-only work misses regional opportunities and could balkanize the renewable energy market Existing CO2 power purchase or power plant siting limitations

  11. Other Factors Shaping the WREZ Playing Field • 368 energy corridors on federal lands • 1221 congestion study and NIETC designations • FERC interconnection and transmission service queuing problems • NREL/WestConnect wind/solar integration study • Order 890 planning requirements • 3 planning level approach in Western Interconnection (transmission provider, sub-regional groups, WECC) Bottom Line - Proposed transmission projects hinge on LSE fuel choices

  12. Overview of WREZ Phases • Identification of WREZs • Technical analysis • Stakeholder “ground truthing” • Conceptual transmission from WREZs • Coordinated procurement for renewables (beyond current budget period) • Institutional options to facilitate interstate transmission for renewables (beyond current budget period)

  13. Critical Elements in Phase 1 • Technical work • Technology characterization; resource assessment; supply curves; delineation of WREZ boundaries • Transparency/communication: Maximum stakeholder input to identifying WREZs • Web based GIS • Easy electronic stakeholder input • Iterations between technical work (e.g., technical contractor work, stakeholder input, and WREZ technical committee/work groups) • Build on/supplement individual state REZ work • Schedule to comport with CA RETI to extent possible

  14. Critical Elements in Phase 2 • LSE fuel choice is prime determinant • After identification of REZs, LSE need tools to: • Prioritize REZ options • Compare with other options • Identify synergies with other LSEs • Develop FEAST-type model to derive delivered price of resource from REZs to LSE load centers. • Transparent tool, ability to change assumptions • Available to LSEs, regulators, and other stakeholders • Integrate with existing sub-regional and WECC transmission expansion planning processes

  15. Phase 2: Pushing and Pulling on the Transmission Expansion String • New Approach: Expanding options LSEs consider (via LBNL model) • User can change inputs • Compare with other generating options • Identify synergies among LSEs to reach specific zones • Historical Approach: Push on the string by: • Getting transmission planners to evaluate lines to renewable resource areas (e.g., exercise Order 890 transmission planning protocols); • increasing rate of return on transmission investments • Designating corridors and pre-empting state siting law

  16. Sub-Regional Planning Groups NTAC NorthwestTransmissionAssessmentCommittee Columbia Grid NTTG WECC Western Electricity Coordinating Council Northern Tier Transmission Group Sierra CCPG ColoradoCoordinatedPlanningGroup CSPG CaliforniaSub-Regional Planaing Group SWAT Activities under WestConnect umbrella SouthwestAreaTransmission

  17. Phase 3: Coordinated renewable resource acquisition • Elements not defined • Phase 2 modeling tool can provide foundation for coordinated procurement • Increasing LSE competition for renewables could be beneficial or unconstructive

  18. Phase 4: Institutional options to facilitate interstate transmission for renewables • Elements not defined • Build on existing efforts • WGA Transmission Permitting Protocol • NTTG • Infrastructure Authority coordination on HPX

  19. Best Guess Timeline • May 28-29 kick-off meeting • Steering Committee meeting • Technical Committee meeting • Initial workgroup meetings • November • End of Phase 1 (identification of zones) • Launch of Phase 2 (transmission from zones)

More Related