html5-img
1 / 27

Foundations of Team Dynamics

Foundations of Team Dynamics. Teamwork In the Securities Industry.

bobby
Télécharger la présentation

Foundations of Team Dynamics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Foundations ofTeam Dynamics

  2. Teamwork In the Securities Industry Paul Tramontano (2nd from left) and other professionals in the securities industry have formed teams to better serve clients. Tramontano heads a 12-person team (called the Topeka Wealth Management Group) at Citigroup’s Smith Barney.

  3. What are Teams? • Groups of two or more people • Exist to fulfill a purpose • Interdependent -- interact and influence each other • Mutually accountable for achieving common goals • Perceive themselves as a social entity

  4. Groups versus Teams • All teams are groups • Some groups are just people assembled together • Teams have task interdependence whereas some groups do not (e.g., group of employees enjoying lunch together)

  5. Many Types of Teams

  6. Why Rely on Teams • Compared with individuals working alone, teams tend to: • Make better decisions • Make better products and services due to more knowledge and expertise • Increase employee engagement

  7. Why Informal Groups Exist • Innate drive to bond • Social identity • We define ourselves by group memberships • Goal accomplishment • Emotional support

  8. Team Effectiveness Defined • Fulfills objectives assigned to the team • Fulfills satisfaction and well-being of team members • Maintains team’s survival

  9. Organizational and Team Environment Team Design Team Effectiveness • Reward systems • Communication systems • Physical space • Organizational environment • Organizational structure • Organizational leadership • Task characteristics • Team size • Team composition • Achieve organizational goals • Satisfy member needs • Maintain team survival Team Processes • Team development • Team norms • Team roles • Team cohesiveness Team Effectiveness Model

  10. Team’s Task and Size • Task characteristics • Better when tasks are clear, easy to implement • Share common inputs, processes, or outcomes • Task interdependence • Team size • Smaller teams are better • But large enough to accomplish task

  11. Resource A B C A B C A B C Levels of Task Interdependence Reciprocal High Sequential Pooled Low

  12. Shell Looks for Team Players Shell holds the 5-day Gourami Business Challenge in Europe, North America, and Asia to observe how well the university students work in teams. One of the greatest challenges is for students from different cultures and educational specializations to work together. Gourami session in Asia -- Courtesy of Shell International Ltd Gourami session in U.S.A. -- Courtesy of Shell U.S.

  13. Team Composition • Motivation • To perform task • To work cooperatively the team • Competencies • Skills and knowledge to perform the task • Ability to work effectively with each other • Homogeneous or heterogeneous, depending on task requirements Gourami session in Asia -- Courtesy of Shell International Ltd Gourami session in U.S.A. -- Courtesy of Shell U.S.

  14. Less conflict Faster teamdevelopment Performs better on cooperative tasks Better coordination High satisfaction of team members More conflict Longer team development Performs better on complex problems More creative Better representation outside the team Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous Teams Homogeneous Teams Heterogeneous Teams

  15. Performing Norming Storming Existing teams might regress back to an earlier stage of development Adjourning Stages of Team Development Forming

  16. Team Norms • Informal rules and expectations team establishes to regulate member behaviors • Norms develop through: • Initial team experiences • Critical events in team’s history • Experience/values members bring to the team

  17. Changing Team Norms • Introduce norms when forming teams • Select members with preferred norms • Discuss counter-productive norms • Reward behaviors representing desired norms • Disband teams with dysfunctional norms

  18. Day 12: Peer pressure begins Day 28: Employee has doubled performance Day 20: Employee begins working alone Day 1: Employee begins job with team 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 Conformity to Team Norms 100 75 Units Pressed per Hour 50 25 0 Production Days

  19. Team Roles • Role -- set of behaviors people are expected to perform in certain positions • Formally assigned or informally acquired based on personality preferences • Belbin’s Team Role Model • Nine team roles -- all needed for optimal team performance • People choose preferred role based on their personality • Some roles more important at particular stages

  20. Team Cohesiveness at Lighthouse Photo: Robert Hirtie. Courtesy of Atlantic Business Magazine & Lighthouse Publishing The staff at Lighthouse Publishing is a highly cohesive group that successfully keeps its much larger competitors off-guard. This cohesiveness has particularly come through when faced with new and unexpected challenges, such as new products or machine breakdowns.

  21. Team Cohesiveness Defined Photo: Robert Hirtie. Courtesy of Atlantic Business Magazine & Lighthouse Publishing • The degree of attraction people feel toward the team and their motivation to remain members • Calculative -- members believe the team will fulfill goals and needs • Emotional -- team is part of person’s social identity

  22. Influences on Team Cohesiveness Member Similarity IncreasingTeam Cohesiveness External Challenges Team Size Team Success Member Interaction Somewhat Difficult Entry

  23. Team Cohesiveness Outcomes • Want to remain members • Willing to share information • Strong interpersonal bonds • Resolve conflict effectively • Better interpersonal relationships

  24. Cohesiveness and Performance Moderately high task performance High taskperformance Team Norms Support Company Goals Moderately low task performance Low task performance Team Norms Oppose Company Goals Low Team Cohesiveness High Team Cohesiveness

  25. The Trouble With Teams • Individuals better/faster on some tasks • Process losses - cost of developing and maintaining teams • Companies don’t support best work environment for team dynamics • Social loafing

  26. How to Minimize Social Loafing • Make individual performance more visible • Form smaller teams • Specialize tasks • Measure individual performance • Increase employee motivation • Increase job enrichment • Select motivated employees

  27. Foundations ofTeam Dynamics

More Related