1 / 7

Airspace Infringement Reduction Plan Explanation

This plan outlines the issues of unauthorized airspace entry by VFR flights. It emphasizes regulator involvement and suggests indicators for airspace complexity. Progress and recommendations discussed.

buffy
Télécharger la présentation

Airspace Infringement Reduction Plan Explanation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Objective SAF10 ESSIP Plan 2013 Ingrid FEIJT DSS/EIPR 13.09.2013

  2. Comprehensive Explanation (1/2) • Airspace infringement, aka “unauthorised penetration of airspace”, is defined as a flight into notified airspace without previously requesting and obtaining approval from the controlling authority of that airspace. • VFR flights are the main originators so GA pilots are the main target => Regulator needs to take the lead for successful implementation. ESSIP Plan 2013 / Objective SAF10

  3. Comprehensive Explanation (2/2) • Not of concern to countries with limited GA/VFR activity and/or no airspace constraints/limitations. Real role for REG (training requirements for private pilots). • Airspace complexity (TMAs) and level of VFR/GA activity are indicators. • Also take into account the way VFR is handled (e.g. controlled or not, TPD or not etc…). ESSIP Plan 2013 / Objective SAF10

  4. Supporting Material • European Action Plan – Airspace Infringement Reduction • EAP-AIRR Guidance Material ESSIP Plan 2013 / Objective SAF10

  5. ESSIP Report 2012 • Implementation progress is improving compared to 2011. • ANSP’s still much more advanced in implementation then the National Regulators. • However, National Regulators are slowly progressing. • Main reasons for delay: • National Regulator has problems in verifying the implementation • National Regulator is still considering the promulgation ESSIP Plan 2013 / Objective SAF10

  6. Objective Coordinator’s Analysis, Recommendations, Tips & Tricks • SLoAs are generic so “Progress” is not enough • Need to add LAs specifying actions taken/planned: • ATCO training updated, ATC procedures reviewed, EUROCONTROL Toolkit used, etc… • Or make reference to national document dealing with this ESSIP Plan 2013 / Objective SAF10

  7. Contacts • Objective Coordinator: FEIJT, Ingrid +32 2 729 5044 ingrid.feijt@eurocontrol.int • DNM Objective Expert(s): LICU, Antonio+32 2 729 3480 antonio.licu@eurocontrol.int ESSIP Plan 2013 / Objective SAF10

More Related