1 / 8

Comprehensive Explanation of Airspace Infringement and ESSIP Plan 2014 Implementation

This document provides a detailed overview of airspace infringement, defined as unauthorized entry into controlled airspace without prior approval from the relevant authority. Highlighting the role of VFR flights, particularly General Aviation (GA) pilots, as key contributors to infringements, it emphasizes the need for proactive regulatory measures. The report reviews recent updates in the ESSIP Plan 2014, noting the stagnation in implementation progress compared to 2012, and offers guidance on improving training and procedures. Key contacts include Ingrid Feijt and Sid Lawrence from EUROCONTROL.

roch
Télécharger la présentation

Comprehensive Explanation of Airspace Infringement and ESSIP Plan 2014 Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Objective SAF10 ESSIP Plan 2014 Ingrid FEIJT DSS/PEPR 19.09.2014

  2. Comprehensive Explanation (1/2) • Airspace infringement, aka “unauthorised penetration of airspace”, is defined as a flight into notified airspace without previously requesting and obtaining approval from the controlling authority of that airspace. • VFR flights are the main originators so GA pilots are the main target => Regulator needs to take the lead for successful implementation. ESSIP Plan 2014 / Objective SAF10

  3. Comprehensive Explanation (2/2) • Not of concern to countries with limited GA/VFR activity and/or no airspace constraints/limitations. Real role for REG (training requirements for private pilots). • Airspace complexity (TMAs) and level of VFR/GA activity are indicators. • Also take into account the way VFR is handled (e.g. controlled or not, TPD or not etc…). ESSIP Plan 2014 / Objective SAF10

  4. What is new or has changed for ESSIP Plan edition 2014 • Deletion of REG01 SLoA ESSIP Plan 2013 / Overview LSSIP 2012

  5. Supporting Material • European Action Plan – Airspace Infringement Reduction • EAP-AIRR Guidance Material ESSIP Plan 2014 / Objective SAF10

  6. ESSIP Report 2013 • Implementation progress is stagnant compared to 2012. • ANSP’s still much more advanced in implementation then the National Regulators. • However, National Regulators are slowly progressing. • Main reasons for delay: • National Regulator has problems in verifying the implementation • National Regulator is still considering the promulgation ESSIP Plan 2014 / Objective SAF10

  7. Objective Coordinator’s Analysis, Recommendations, Tips & Tricks • SLoAs are generic so “Progress” is not enough • Need to add LAs specifying actions taken/planned: • ATCO training updated, ATC procedures reviewed, EUROCONTROL Toolkit used, etc… • Or make reference to national document dealing with this ESSIP Plan 2014 / Objective SAF10

  8. Contacts • Objective Coordinator: FEIJT, Ingrid +32 2 729 5044 ingrid.feijt@eurocontrol.int • DNM Objective Expert(s): LAWRENCE, Sid+32 2 729 3029 richard.lawrence@eurocontrol.int ESSIP Plan 2014 / Objective SAF10

More Related