1 / 10

Reading Demand and the Common Core Standards -- Implications

Reading Demand and the Common Core Standards -- Implications. Otis Fulton Senior Vice President, MetaMetrics ofulton@Lexile.com. Postsecondary Options. Williamson, G. L. (2004). Student readiness for postsecondary options. MetaMetrics, Inc.

cameron-boyer
Télécharger la présentation

Reading Demand and the Common Core Standards -- Implications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reading Demand and the Common Core Standards -- Implications Otis Fulton Senior Vice President, MetaMetrics ofulton@Lexile.com

  2. Postsecondary Options Williamson, G. L. (2004). Student readiness for postsecondary options. MetaMetrics, Inc.

  3. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECEB) Study

  4. Change in Text Complexity in Textbooks over the Last Century

  5. How well do you have to read for college and careers? Williamson, G. L. (2008). A Text Readability Continuum for Postsecondary Readiness. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(4), 602-632.

  6. Text Gap

  7. The Standards (starting formally in grade 2) define what proportion of the texts students read each year should come from a particular text complexity grade band (2–3, 4–5, 6–8, 9–10, or 11–12). Students must also show a steadily increasing ability to discern more from and make fuller use of text, including making an increasing number of connections among ideas and between texts, considering a wider range of textual evidence, and becoming more sensitive to inconsistencies, ambiguities, and poor reasoning in texts. Common Core Appendix A

  8. Common Core Appendix A

  9. Percentage distribution of literary and informational passages National Assessment Governing Board. Reading Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, D.C.: American Institutes for Research, 2007.

More Related