1 / 24

The Colorado Department of Education Educator Effectiveness 2013

Teacher Librarians and S.B. 10-191 Where Do We Fit In? An information session for all stakeholders. The Colorado Department of Education Educator Effectiveness 2013. Together We C an. Vision

chick
Télécharger la présentation

The Colorado Department of Education Educator Effectiveness 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Teacher Librarians and S.B. 10-191Where Do We Fit In?An information session for all stakeholders The Colorado Department of Education Educator Effectiveness 2013

  2. Together We Can Vision All students in Colorado will become educated and productive citizens capable of succeeding in a globally competitive workforce. Mission The mission of CDE is to shape, support, and safeguard a statewide education system that prepares all students for success in a globally competitive world.

  3. Goals Successful students Prepare students to thrive in their education and in a globally competitive workforce. • Ensure every student is on track to graduate postsecondary and workforce ready. • Increase achievement for all students and close achievement gaps. • Ensure students graduate ready for success in postsecondary education and the workforce. • Increase national and international competitiveness for all students. Great teachers and leaders Ensure effective educators for every student and effective leaders for every school and district. • Increase and support the effectiveness of all educators. • Optimize the preparation, retention, and effectiveness of new educators. • Eliminate the educator equity gap. Outstanding schools and districts Build the capacity of schools and districts to meet the needs of Colorado students and their families. • Increase school and district performance. • Turnaround the state’s lowest performing districts and schools. • Foster innovation and expand access to a rich array of high quality school choices for students. Best education system in the nation Build the best education system in the nation. • Lead the nation in policy, innovation, and positive outcomes for students. • Operate with excellence, efficiency, and effectiveness to become the best SEA in the nation. • Attract and retain outstanding talent to CDE. Students Educators Schools/ Districts State

  4. Students Educators Schools/ Districts

  5. When we intentionally integrate… Coherent and rigorous academic standards Innovative and engaging learning options Supported and effective educators Aligned and meaningful assessments Statewide and district accountability Expanding Student Learning We can personalize learning and ignite the potential of every student.

  6. Introductions

  7. How are you feeling about SB 191? Choose a picture from below that best reflects your feelings regarding SB 191. Why did you select the picture you did?

  8. How do Teacher Librarians fit into S. B. 10-191? • S.B. 10-191 DOES apply to teacher librarians as those stakeholders require a CDE license • The hiring practices of districts will also play a role in determining if evaluation under S.B. 191 is required • Example: hiring of a technician rather than a teacher librarian

  9. Purposes of S.B. 10-191 • A system to evaluate the effectiveness of licensed personnel and continually improve the quality of education and student outcomes. • Provide meaningful feedback for professional growth and continuous improvement. • Provide a basis for making decisions in the areas of hiring, compensation, promotion, assignment, professional development, earning and retaining non-probationary status, dismissal, and nonrenewal of contract.

  10. What are the requirements of SB 191 related to evaluation? • Annualevaluations for all teachers, principals and specialized service professionals. • Evaluation based on statewide Quality Standards defining what it means to be an effective teacher or principal; • Professional practice Quality Standards (I-V) account for 50% of an educator's annual evaluation. • The other 50% of an educator's annual evaluation is based on the Quality Standard (VI) that measures student learning outcomes. • Non-probationary status is earned after three consecutive years of demonstrated effectiveness. • Non-probationary status is lost after two consecutive years of ineffective ratings.

  11. Timeline for Implementation of New Requirements for Personnel Evaluation Systems, cont. 2013-14: • New performance evaluation system based on Quality Standards will be implemented statewide per State Board rule. • Teacher librarians will be evaluated based on quality standards. • Demonstrated effectiveness will begin to be considered in the acquisition of non-probationary status. 2014-15: • Continued implementation. • Demonstrated effectiveness or ineffectiveness will be considered in the acquisition or loss of probationary or non-probationary status. 2015-16: • First year that non-probationary status can be lost based on 2 consecutive years of demonstrated ineffectiveness.

  12. How do Teacher Librarians fit into S. B. 10-191? So how will teacher librarians be evaluated? • At this time, the State Council for Educator Effectiveness has stated that they believe teacher librarians are teachers and should therefore be evaluated using a teacher evaluation tool or rubric aligned to the Teacher Quality Standards. • This is the case with the State Model System for Teachers • We have asked our pilot districts using the State Model System for Teachers to use the evaluation rubric with their teacher librarians • CDE is currently gathering data and feedback from pilot district teacher librarians to determine if modifications or additions to the rubric are necessary in order to explicitly capture their work

  13. Evaluations I. Mastery of content II. Establish learning environment III. Facilitate learning IV. Reflect on practice V. Demonstrate leadership VI. Responsibility for student academic growth • Measured using multiple measures on multiple occasions, including: (1) observations; and (2) at least one of the following: student perception measures, where appropriate and feasible, peer feedback, feedback from parents or guardians, or review of teacher lesson plans or student work samples. May include additional measures. Evaluated using the following: (1) a measure of individually-attributed growth, (2) a measure of collectively-attributed growth; (3) when available, statewide summative assessment results; and (4) for subjects with statewide summative assessment results available in two consecutive grades, results from the Colorado Growth Model.

  14. STATE COUNCIL FOR EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS Framework for System to Evaluate Teachers Definition of Teacher Effectiveness Quality Standards I. Know Content II. Establish Environment V. Demonstrate Leadership III. Facilitate Learning IV. Reflect on Practice VI. Student Growth 50% Professional Practice Standards50% Student Growth Measures Observations of Other Measures Teaching Aligned with CDE Guidelines Weighting: How Much Does Each Standard Count Towards Overall Performance? State Other Assessments Other Measures Summative for Non-tested Aligned with Assessments Areas CDE Guidelines Match of test to teaching assignments Weighting: Scoring Framework: How Do Measures of Quality Standards Result in a Determination of Individual Performance? Performance Ratings IneffectivePartially EffectiveEffectiveHighly Effective Appeals Process

  15. Student Learning Outcomes

  16. Evaluations I. Mastery of content II. Establish learning environment III. Facilitate learning IV. Reflect on practice V. Demonstrate leadership VI. Responsibility for student academic growth • Measured using multiple measures on multiple occasions, including: (1) observations; and (2) at least one of the following: student perception measures, where appropriate and feasible, peer feedback, feedback from parents or guardians, or review of teacher lesson plans or student work samples. May include additional measures. Evaluated using the following: (1) a measure of individually-attributed growth, (2) a measure of collectively-attributed growth; (3) when available, statewide summative assessment results; and (4) for subjects with statewide summative assessment results available in two consecutive grades, results from the Colorado Growth Model.

  17. STATE COUNCIL FOR EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS Framework for System to Evaluate Teachers Definition of Teacher Effectiveness Quality Standards I. Know Content II. Establish Environment V. Demonstrate Leadership III. Facilitate Learning IV. Reflect on Practice VI. Student Growth 50% Professional Practice Standards50% Student Growth Measures Observations of Other Measures Teaching Aligned with CDE Guidelines Weighting: How Much Does Each Standard Count Towards Overall Performance? State Other Assessments Other Measures Summative for Non-tested Aligned with Assessments Areas CDE Guidelines Match of test to teaching assignments Weighting: Scoring Framework: How Do Measures of Quality Standards Result in a Determination of Individual Performance? Performance Ratings IneffectivePartially EffectiveEffectiveHighly Effective Appeals Process

  18. From Student Academic Growth to Student Learning Outcomes Student Learning Outcomes Using multiple measures to determine student learning over time. Colorado Growth Model (CGM) establishes technical measure of “growth.”

  19. Student Learning Outcome Requirements Refers to outcomes on a measure that are attributed to an individual licensed person, e.g. DRA2 outcome measures for a 1st Grade Teacher’s students Evaluated using the following: (1) a measure of individually-attributed growth, (2) a measure of collectively-attributed growth; (3) when available, statewide summative assessment results; and (4) for subjects with statewide summative assessment results available in two consecutive grades, results from the Colorado Growth Model. Refers to outcomes on a measure are attributed to two or more licensed personnel, e.g. 10th gr. Math TCAP – All Secondary math teachers in school

  20. NOW, how do you feel about SB 191? Choose a picture from below that best reflects your feelings regarding SB 191 now. Why did you select the picture you did? Did your picture selection change?

  21. What remaining questions do you have?

  22. Contact Us EE Leadership • Katy Anthes: Executive Director • Anthes_K@cde.state.co.us • Toby King: Director • King_T@cde.state.co.us • Mike Gradoz: Director • Gradoz_M@cde.state.co.us • Jean Williams: Rubric Evaluation Specialist • Williams_J@cde.state.co.us Communications • Amy Skinner: Director • Skinner_A@cde.state.co.us • Katie Lams • Lams_K@cde.state.co.us • Britt Wilkenfeld: Data Fellow • Wilkenfeld_B@cde.state.co.us • Tricia Majors: Project Mgr. • Majors_T@cde.state.co.us

  23. Contact Us • Bob Snead • Snead_B@cde.state.co.us • Chris Vance • Vance_C@cde.state.co.us Implementation Support and Development • Tara Boertzel-Schuenemann • Boertzel_T@cde.state.co.us • Courtney Cabrera • Cabrera_C@cde.state.co.us • Sed Keller • Keller_S@cde.state.co.us • Dawn Pare • Pare_D@cde.state.co.us

More Related