Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation
Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement.Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien.Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.
F I N
Plus de contenu associé
Transcription de la présentation
Case Law Landmark cases and their effect on our rights and liberties
Freedom of Speech Not just the use of words…. Anything from books and movies, to flag burning as well as t-shirts and pornography are covered by free speech
Seditious Speech • Schenck. v. U.S., 1919 “Clear and Present Danger Rule” • Gitlow v. NY, 1925: upheld Schenck against communists • Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969 KKK and violent speech
Symbolic Speech • Tinker v. Des Moines School District, 1969 • Students wearing armbands to protest the Vietnam War • Applies to other types of t-shirts as well
Flag Burning is symbolic speech • Texas V. Johnson, 1989 • U.S. v. Eichman, 1990 • Allows the burning of U.S. flags as protest
Commercial Speech • Wooley v. Maynard, 1977: New Hampshire “Live Free or Die” Motto on license plates • JN36TN • 2010 2nd Circuit allowed saying states ban on religious plates had been unevenly applied: “Genesis”
Obscenity Cases • Roth v. U.S., 1957 defined obscenity strictly; "dominant theme taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interest" • Memoirs v. Mass.,1966 the court viewed porn to decide what was and was not obscene!! • Stanley v. Georgia, 1969Prohibited making mere private possession of obscene material a crime. Overturned Roth, kind of
Miller v. California, 1973 • Overturned Roth • local standards may apply over a national definition • HOWEVER: Obscenity isn’t always protected. • But we do have a right to privacy
14th AmendmentSection 1 All persons born or naturalized in the U.S. and subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. are citizens of the U.S. and their state NO STATE shall deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process; nor deny any person equal protection of the law
Roe v. Wade, 1973 • Does the term “person” as used in the 14th apply to the unborn? Court said: • NO • Does the right to privacy include a woman’s choice to have an abortion? • YES
Law in regards to abortions: • #1 First trimester the state cannot intervene • #2 Second trimester, the state can make reasonable restrictions • #3 Third trimester CAN be outlawed • OHIO: Ohio has a ban against abortions after a fetus has become viable. (20-24 weeks?)
Freedom of Religion “separation of church and state” John Locke Phrase not in our Constitution Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists: “Wall of separation” Used by the court as original intent of the 1st amendment
Establishment Clause • “separation of church and state” • Most establishment cases deal with religion and education • Everson v. Board of Education, 1947: busing and catholic schools
The “Lemon” Test • Lemon v. Kurtzman, 1971 #1 Purpose of public money must be secular (worldly, non-religious) #2 $ must not hurt or help religion #3 $ must avoid “excessive entanglement” between gov’t and religion
Free Exercise Clause • Not always free! • Reynolds v. U.S., 1879: Polygamy • My personal fav….Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye: marijuana & sacrifices
Sometimes it IS Free Exercise • Wisconsin v. Yoder, 1972: Amish children and the 8th grade • W. Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 1943: Mandatory flag salute unconstitutional (speech though, not religion)
Assembly and Petition • “Right of Association”: • Boy Scouts v. Dale, 2000: Homosexuals do not have the right to be admitted to private organizations if it stops the organization from spreading their “message”
New Topic: Cases Involving Protection from Cops and Courts
4th Amendment – The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated……. • Exclusionary Rule: Illegally obtained evidence cannot be used Weeks v. U.S, 1914 (lottery tix) • )
OF COURSE: • Minnesota v. Carter, 1999 “Plain View”
Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 • 4th Amendmentapplied to all state officials, such as state and local police (INCORPORATION)
Other Exclusionary Rule Cases • Nix v. Williams, 1984: evidence can be used if it would have turned up eventually (body) • Maryland v. Garrison, 1987: “honest mistakes” (two apts) • Arizona v. Evans, 1995: “Good Faith” (wrong name on warrant)
Does Drug Testing violate 4th Amendment? • Various cases have allowed random drug testing in certain cases • Veronia School District v. Acton, 1995: Student athletes • BOE v. Earls, 2002 ALL Students in extra-curricular activities
6th Amendment Cases • Gideon v. Wainwright, 1963 • Miranda v. Arizona, 1966 However…Illinois v. Perkins, 1990 : Undercover cops
Ohio’s Speedy Trials • In Jail = 90 days • Out of Jail = 270 days • Defendant can always waive their right to a speedy trial by signing a form
Death Penalty Cruel and Unusual? • Furman v. Georgia, 1972(race) • Gregg v. Georgia, 1976 ruled the two part cases constitutional • Atkins v. Virginia, 2002 death cannot be imposed on mentally challenged • Roper v. Simmons, 2005 cannot be imposed on minors
PINK - no capital punishment Darker ORANGE - minimum age of 18 MEDIUM ORANGE - minimum age of 17 YELLOW - minimum age of 16
Death Penalty Cruel and Unusual? • Kennedy v. Louisiana,2008 – rape of child (Coker v. Georgia, 1977 – rape of an adult) death penalty only for those who kill (except Treason)
Notable States’ Rights Cases • Cohens v. Virginia, 1821State laws in opposition to national laws are void. • South Dakota v. Dole, 1987Congress may attach reasonable conditions to funds disbursed without running afoul of the 10th Amendment.
Pre-Bill of Rights Liberties • Habeas Corpus • No Bills of Attainders • No Ex Post Facto laws • Citizens of all states treated equally • No religious qualifications for seeking political office
“Incorporation” • The Bill of Rights was written to protect citizens from the Federal government. • QUESTION: Do (did) these apply to STATE governments?
14th AmendmentSection 1 All persons born or naturalized in the U.S. and subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. are citizens of the U.S. and their state NO STATE shall deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process; nor deny any person equal protection of the law
The Two Most Important Parts of the 14th: #1 Due Process Procedural – gov’t acts fairly Substantive – actual law must be reasonable