70 likes | 159 Vues
Explore the benefits of library networks for seamless cataloging, resource sharing, and scholarly communication in the digital age. Embrace the evolution towards international networks and innovative services like electronic delivery and knowledge sharing.
E N D
The librarian’s view Raf Dekeyser K.U.Leuven Serenate
Why do libraries network? (1) • Cataloguing • Copy-cataloguing (exchange of records) • Search access (useful for ILL!) • Collective catalogues (e.g. Worldcat) • merged catalogues or virtual joint catalogue • importance of standards for metadata (MARC21, Dublin Core) and and exchange of information (Z39.50) • Integrated library management system (e.g. LIBIS-Net...) • cataloguing, circulation, acquisition, user control... • historical shift from dedicated terminals to client/server system to direct web interfaces Serenate
Why do libraries network? (2) • Interlibrary loan • Search and order • Electronic delivery • Accounting • Evolution from national towards large international networks Serenate
Why do libraries network? (3) • Database access • Bibliographic databases • on campus server • shared in library consortium • web access to publisher • Full text journals • special offers for consortia • Books, theses, courseware • publisher’s network with “printing on demand” • allows for broad distribution of rare books and cultural heritage documents Serenate
Why do libraries network? (4) • Electronic Reference Service: “Ask a librarian” (e.g. QuestionPoint from LC & OCLC) • Network for knowledge sharing • Automatic routing of questions, based on collection of strength profiles • 24/7 staffing becomes possible! • In USA already installed in large public library networks Serenate
New model for scholarly communication • Network of institutional e-print archives • inspired by Los Alamos “arXiv” (Ginsparg) • metadata exchange through OAI metadata protocol • harvesters provide intelligent access to documents • Valuable alternative for commercial journals? • financially competitive • ideal for author-paid model • problems to make it acceptable to research community • Validation method (peer review) • important success factor • technical solution still lacking • collaboration from learned societies requested • Internet allows for new methods for evaluation and impact measurement Serenate
Requirements • Interface software for (simultaneous) search and retrieval access to diverse database systems(different standards, metadata-sets, languages,...) • Intelligent full-text search engine • Foolproof quality label management system for peer review control • Fast exchange of large multimedia files • Enormous potential for wireless communication applications Serenate