1 / 22

Renovating Protection Coordination, Southern Sudan 2010

Renovating Protection Coordination, Southern Sudan 2010. Renovating Protection Coordination, Southern Sudan 2010. What we’ve done: A quick audit of existing protection coordination structure Dissected the mandates to define “protection” and “protection of civilians”

cosmo
Télécharger la présentation

Renovating Protection Coordination, Southern Sudan 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Renovating Protection Coordination, Southern Sudan 2010

  2. Renovating Protection Coordination, Southern Sudan 2010 • What we’ve done: • A quick audit of existing protection coordination structure • Dissected the mandates • to define “protection” and “protection of civilians” • Bilateral and group discussions with protection coordination “users” • - Discussed division of labor…and accountabilities • So, what is the ideal protection coordination structure • that flows from this?

  3. Quick audit: • what we’ve done • Spreadsheet of • All protection staff in all states (UNHCR, UNMIS, UNICEF, NGOs); and • All PWGs, CPWGs, etc in all states in past 9 months

  4. Quick audit: what we’ve found: • No Protection Working Groups in 5 of 10 states • No protection officers (UNMIS or UNHCR) in 2 of 10 states • 12 out of 34 UNMIS Protection positions are vacant • So far, only 2 of 10 states record a regular CPWG

  5. Dissecting the mandates, in order to define “Protection” and “Protection of Civilians”

  6. Defining “Protection” Protection is all activities aimed at obtaining full respect for the rights of the individual in accordance with the letter and spirit of the relevant bodies of law, namely human rights law, international humanitarian law and refugee law. -- IASC definition

  7. Defining “Protection of Civilians” ???“Protection of Civilians” = “Protection” = IASC definition ???

  8. “Protection of civilians in armed conflict and other situations of violence”, as one essential component of “Protection” Protection in the comprehensive sense: the IASC definition UNCT UNMIS UNMIS Civilians in other situations of violence: situations that do not meet the requirements set by Art. 3/APII, which includes group violence between combatants and civilians, or amongst civilians, for tribal, political or religious reasons. Civilians in armed conflict: as defined by IHL (Art. 3/APII)

  9. (Non-State) Mandates for Protection in South Sudan: Distinctions and Overlaps Civilians and who are IDPs Mandate: currently ? Mandate, if clusterized: generally UNHCR Protection as a Comprehensive Concept Protection is: “all activities aimed at obtaining full respect for the rights of the individual in accordance with the letter and spirit of the relevant bodies of law, namely human rights law, international humanitarian law and refugee law.” [IASC, from ICRC] Combatants Additional rights and duties per IHL and who are Non-Citizens ARMED CONFLICT contextPEACE and who are Refugees additional rights & duties under Int’l refugee law Mandate UNHCR And who are Stateless Rights/duties per Conventions Mandate UNHCR And who are in armed conflict/affected by armed conflict/…? Mandate: UNMIS (PoC/CivPol/Mi)

  10. Benefits of the new protection coordination structure

  11. Overcomingthe silo effect

  12. Connecting more effectively.- Field to center to field- Within the mission- Amongst protection partners And remaining connected.

  13. Connectingbetter: Field to center to field - No co-leads, no co-chairs = direct accountability for communication - PWG reporting is autonomous from agency/mission reporting lines = eliminates roadblocks to quick communication - Center analyzes and feeds info back to field = Field sees benefits, and reports more.

  14. Connectingbetter: Within the mission Inter-pillar and inter-unit: clarifying “protection of civilians” better defines boundaries and respective roles of mission pillars and the units within. - Humanitarian pillar: Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, Child Protection - Political pillar: Civil Affairs, Human Rights and Rule of Law, - Military component: TCC and Civilian Police- Dedicated liaison cell for PoC in Armed Conflict and Other Situations of Violence provides a centerpoint for policy formation and incident response:- Brings together each UNMIS pillar/unit relevant to PoC into structured liaison for first time - Clearly designates lead role and accountability for PoC coordination to one UNMIS unit - Bi-monthly Steering Committee allows periodic guidance and oversight by each pillar head in Khartoum, but without delaying operational daily response.

  15. Connecting better: Amongst protection partners - Respective roles, mandates and accountabilities of partners are better defined- Liaison Cell provides mechanism to firewall political and military elements from routine Protection Cluster proceedings by humanitarians- Liaison Cell provides the bridge for humanitarians to connect with mission and its assets, in a more structured and principled way.

  16. Structural flowchart

  17. You’ve reached the end:extra slides to follow

  18. Renovating Protection Coordination, Southern Sudan 2010 Goals and Benchmarks . . . clear and simple.

  19. Goals. Our ideas, to be further refined by Cluster discussion….

  20. Goals . . .and Benchmarks. By end of Q1 - Protection Cluster established in Juba; all subcluster and PWG chairs appointed. - Protection coordination skills workshop undertaken for all PWG and Subcluster chairs. - At least 1 PWG is in place in each State.

  21. Goals . . .and Benchmarks. Goal Two: Protection information throughout southern Sudan is systematically - collected, - analysed, and - provided back to participants of the Protection Cluster, In order to better ascertain protection needs and the interventions that are required. Time Benchmark By end of Q1: Complete a mapping exercise of all protection information systems and a proposal for common inter-agency system for collecting, recording and analysing protection events or incidents. By end of Q2: - Roll-out of new inter-agency system in four states. - Launch of IDP Profiling Exercise. By end of Q3: - Roll-out of new inter-agency system in additional four states. By end of Q4: - Roll-out of new inter-agency system in all ten states completed. - At least 50% of all reports are from incidents at least 100km outside of state capitals. - Completion of IDP Profiling Exercise; results provided to Cluster participants.

  22. Goals . . .and Benchmarks. End of Q1 First protection assessment by a Protection Cluster member of a new incident is undertaken on average within one week of first credible report. End of Q2 On average, incident specific interventions are undertaken for at least 50% of incidents with relevant authorities within one month. End of Q4 - On basis of findings of IDP profiling, protection cluster participants agree on priority operational protection issues for following year. - __% of population in the southern Sudan has access to legal information or legal aid.

More Related