1 / 40

Gamma Camera Quality Control

Gamma Camera Quality Control. Without adequate quality control, the functional reliability of a nuclear medicine facility is in doubt. Quality Control: A Crucial Component In Ensuring Quality Patient Care.

deidra
Télécharger la présentation

Gamma Camera Quality Control

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gamma Camera Quality Control Without adequate quality control, the functional reliability of a nuclear medicine facility is in doubt. Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  2. Quality Control: A Crucial Component In Ensuring Quality Patient Care • Routine conduction of equipment quality control is a necessity for ensuring quality patient care by establishing quality imaging. • All instrumentation specific to the operations of a nuclear medicine facility must undergo quality control testing on a regular basis to assure reliability and safety. • Quality patient care can only be achieved if optimal diagnostic accuracy is demonstrated through appropriate quality control procedures. • According to published guidelines written by • the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC), • the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), • the Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM), • as well as radiation safety guidelines issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), agreement states and other radiology societies, quality control of equipment must be performed routinely and documented. Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  3. Part of an overall nuclear medicine quality assurance program Survey meter calibration Dose calibrator QC testing Scintillation (thyroid) probe testing Scintillation camera QC testing Computer software testing Monitor performance testing Staff performance ‘Outcomes’ testing Quality Control testing The routine assessment of an instrument in order to confirm acceptable system performance Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  4. Spatial linearity Energy resolution Flood field uniformity Spatial resolution (intrinsic and extrinsic) System alignment SPECT reconstructed spatial resolution Whole body spatial resolution Multiple window spatial registration Count rate performance System sensitivity Detector shielding Detector sensitivity System volume sensitivity Standards • NEMA – National Electrical Manufacturers Association • Establishes definitions, quantitative measurements of performance characteristics and reporting techniques for the specification of scintillation camera parameters Performed during acceptance testing prior to first use Verified during total system evaluation annually Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  5. Routine Camera Quality Control procedures • Daily • Visual checking the energy spectrum – “peaking” • Evaluating the system performance with flood sources – “daily floods” • Weekly • Checking the spatial resolution with a bar phantom • Checking the system linearity with a bar phantom • Correcting for system and collimator non-uniformities • Performing camera uniformity analysis • Monthly • Checking the center of rotation for tomographic scans • System sensitivity Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  6. Scintillation Camera Performance • Extrinsic, or System measurements – with the collimator attached • Give the best indication of clinical performance • Intrinsic measurements– with the collimator off • Useful for comparing the performance of different cameras because they uncouple the camera performance from the collimator performance Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  7. Camera operation James R Halama, PhD Loyola UniversityMedical Center Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  8. Camera operation James R Halama, PhD Loyola UniversityMedical Center Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  9. Camera operation James R Halama, PhD Loyola UniversityMedical Center Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  10. Camera operation James R Halama, PhD Loyola UniversityMedical Center Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  11. Camera operation James R Halama, PhD Loyola UniversityMedical Center Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  12. Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  13. Uniformity • The measure of a camera’s response to a uniform irradiation of the camera surface. • Intrinsic uniformity is measured using a radionuclide point source (~150 uCi Tc-99m) placed approximately 5 crystal diameters away from an uncollimated camera • System or Extrinsic uniformity is measured using a sheet source placed directly on the surface of a collimated camera • 5 to 10 millicuries (mCi) of Co-57 or • 25 mCi Tc-99m in fillable-water tank. Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  14. Sheet Sources 57Co Sheet Source T1/2 = 270 days 122 keV 10-15 mCi at time of purchase. 99mTc Sheet Source (water filled) T1/2 = 6 hrs. 140 keV 10-15 mCi at time of filling. Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  15. Daily Flood • 5 million counts • 256 x 256 acquisition matrix • Resulting image should show a uniform distribution across the entire field of view Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  16. Uniformity parameters • UFOV – useful field of view • CFOV – center field of view • Integral uniformity • The difference between the maximum and the minimum pixel value divided by the sum of these two values X 100 = +/- 100 X (Max – Min)/(Max + Min) • Differential uniformity • The largest difference between any two pixels within a set of 5 contiguous pixels in a row or column (rate of change) = +/- 100 X (Hi – Low)/(Hi + Low) Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  17. Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  18. Spatial Resolution / System Linearity“BARS” • Resolution - the ability of a camera to separately image two objects. • If the two objects are seen as a single blurred spot in the image until they are 5mm apart, the resolution is said to be 5mm. • Linearity - the ability of a camera to reproduce a straight line. • 3 million counts, 256 x 256 matrix for extrinsic • 30 million counts 512 x 512 matrix for intrinsic Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  19. Spatial Resolution James R Halama, PhD Loyola UniversityMedical Center Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  20. Spatial Resolution James R Halama, PhD Loyola UniversityMedical Center Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  21. Spatial LinearityDeviation from straight line of less than 1.0 mm for UFOV PLES Phantom Quadrant Bar Phantom James R Halama, PhD Loyola UniversityMedical Center Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  22. Intrinsic Uniformity James R Halama, PhD Loyola UniversityMedical Center Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  23. Extrinsic Uniformity James R Halama, PhD Loyola UniversityMedical Center Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  24. Resolution phantoms Moire effect Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  25. UB gamma camera test pattern One image per detector head is all that's needed to equally and effectively test all quadrants of the gamma camera. Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  26. Uniformity corrections • Correcting for system and collimator non-uniformities due to small variations in sensitivity. • Applied to tomographic (SPECT) reconstructed images • Acquired for each collimator that is used for SPECT imaging • 30 to 120 million count acquisition • 256 or 512 matrix size Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  27. Uniformity corrections James R Halama, PhD Loyola UniversityMedical Center Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  28. Camera uniformity analysis • Similar to a daily flood except greater number of counts acquired • ≥30 million counts • 256 x 256 matrix • Useful for tracking of uniformity trends Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  29. Center of rotation - COR • Used to verify the integrity of the motion of the gantry during tomographic imaging • COR value is the difference between the measured COR and the theoretical COR • Tc-99m point source either centered in the field of view or off centered Acceptable limits < ±2 mm Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  30. Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  31. Center of rotation - COR James R Halama, PhD Loyola UniversityMedical Center Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  32. SPECT Phantoms – system performance testing • Jaszczak Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  33. SPECT Phantoms – tomographic system performance testing Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  34. SPECT Phantoms – tomographic system performance testing James R Halama, PhD Loyola UniversityMedical Center Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  35. SPECT Phantoms – planar system performance testing James R Halama, PhD Loyola UniversityMedical Center Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  36. Society of Nuclear Medicine ‘simulator’ phantom program Lumbar Spine Cardiac Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  37. SPECT phantom Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  38. ICANL INTERSOCIETAL COMMISSION FORTHE ACCREDITATION OF NUCLEARLABORATORIES Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  39. PET/CT plus consideration for the CT portion and the merging of the two imaging modalities. Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

  40. SPECT/CTin review • Similar to SPECT with consideration for CT portion and the merging of the two imaging modalities. Frank P. Dawry Physx.home.comcast.net

More Related