1 / 22

Real-Time Demand Curve For Reserves

Real-Time Demand Curve For Reserves. NEPOOL Markets Committee Meeting 01/24/2001 M.S. DePillis. Basic Concepts. Price is determined by intersection of bid supply and demand curve. If last bidder lies below demand curve, then P is from demand curve.

drago
Télécharger la présentation

Real-Time Demand Curve For Reserves

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Real-Time Demand Curve For Reserves NEPOOL Markets Committee Meeting 01/24/2001 M.S. DePillis

  2. Basic Concepts • Price is determined by intersection of bid supply and demand curve. • If last bidder lies below demand curve, then P is from demand curve. • Old ex post market flaws are still there.

  3. Normal Intersection With Bid Supply Curve P of MW Price When Last Bid > D P* Q of MW

  4. Highest Bidder Less Than Demand Curve P of MW Price When Last Bid < D P* Q of MW

  5. Some Old Flaws • Still works with designation. • High bids not designated or paid. D Bidder D not paid P* C B A Q of MW

  6. Changes to Demand Curve • Change 1: Demand Curve applies throughout range of TMOR. • Change 2: "Target" point on Demand Curve changes with UC Conditions.

  7. Demand Curve Throughout • Solves discontinuity problem. • Recognizes that bid determined prices in OP-4 are not competitive market prices.

  8. New Demand Curve P of MW Zero TMOR 1/2 2nd Contingency 100 50 Full 30 Minute Replacement Reserve Q of MW

  9. Alternative Solution to Discontinuity Problem Considered setting OP-4 point to E(ECP) 1/2 2nd Contingency Est. ECP1 Est. ECP2 Est. ECP3 Q of MW Old Market

  10. Reasons For Rejection • Over-pricing (by definition always at or close to OP-4 cap). • Physical real-time withholding is rewarded (raises demand curve). • Could have TMOR = E(ECP) =$300 at t1 then TMOR=$40 t2 when further into OP-4.

  11. Target Point • Result of discussions with Operations. • Represents Unit Commitment practice.

  12. Target Point Adjusted for NY Shared Reserve of 300MW P of MW Zero TMOR 100 Target Point at 600MW of TMRR 50 Target Point at 300MW of TMRR Q of MW

  13. Other Proposal Changes • No co-optimization before Phase 1. • Price Cascading of TMOR Only.

  14. No Co-optimization Before Phase 1 • Would only apply for about 8 months. • Would be major rework of SPD. • Would require significant testing to reduce risk. • Risk/Benefit ratio not satisfactory.

  15. Minimal Price Cascading • TMOR price determined by demand curve is price floor for TMNSR and TMSR. • TMOR represents willingness to pay for lower quality good.

  16. Problem With Full Reverse Price Cascading • Current market instances of high TMNSR prices do not represent economic value except by chance. • Difficult to argue that TMNSR should be cascaded back to TMSR.

  17. Unit Commitment and Demand Curves • Operations still committed to use a demand curve. • First Step is Observing Effect of NY Sharing Agreement on Unit Commitment and Target Point. • Will require that long-term reliability is defined and maintained. • White paper being developed, first draft.

  18. Proposed New Type of Unit Commitment Analysis

  19. Unit Commitment and Demand Curve, Continued • "Target" of real-time demand curve would be derived from process described above. • Must have action plan in place if demand curve results in measurable and significant deterioration of reliability. • Not yet ready for rule writing. • Need to revise Unit Commitment System Operating Procedure to reflect changes.

  20. Result of Investigating Price of TMOR during OP-4 • Price calculated as follows: • All observations have TMOR deficiencies. • All observations are from 5 minute data since start of markets. • All observations are capped at the 5 minute energy price.

  21. Result of TMOR Price Study

  22. Approximately Same Revenue Result P of MW Zero TMOR 1/2 2nd Contingency 100 72.13 50 Q of MW

More Related