SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Northeast Utilities Demand Curve Review

cathal avatar
cathal
10 diapositives · 231 Views · Jul 27, 2014

Analyzing the revised NU demand curve for capacity markets focusing on reliability, price stability and market incentives. The curve meets important design principles, offering a balance between price cap range and reliability objectives.

#northeast utilities demand curve review #northeast utilities demand curve review ppt #powerpoint #presentation
Northeast Utilities Demand Curve Review - slide 1
01 / 10Northeast Utilities Demand Curve Review
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Northeast Utilities Demand Curve Review
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. Revised NU Demand Curve For MC Review March 12, 2014

  2. Background • At the February 27 MC meeting, NU offered a demand curve that had a cap at 1.5x Net CONE, a straight slope with no kink starting at a MW value corresponding to 1 day in 5 years and an x-axis intercept at 1 day in 100 years (21.5% reserve margin). • That curve was very close statically to the Initial Candidate Curve prepared by the Brattle Group. However, its long term average LOLE was 0.107 days/yr where the target is 0.100 meaning it is slightly less reliable than target. • In an attempt to improve the reliability of the curve, NU requested Brattle to analyze a curve with a cap of 1.6x Net CONE keeping the other two parameters the same. The result was a curve with a long term average LOLE of 0.095 – slightly more reliable than the target of 0.100

  3. Background (continued) • One more time • Given the results of the analysis for NU’s two curves, NU asked Brattle to do one more analysis on a curve that was capped at 1.5x Net CONE and tune the x-axis intercept to achieve the target reliability of 0.100 • The result of that analysis was a curve that intersected the x-axis at a reserve margin of 22.4% (109.2% of NICR) compared with the Initial Candidate Curve and the previous NU curve having reserve margins at the toe of 21.5% (108.3% of NICR) - an increase of 0.9%.

  4. Northeast Utilities Updated Curve = NU-31.5x Cap, Right-Shifted Toe, Tuned to 1-in-10

  5. The NU Demand Curve Meets Important Design Principles • Meets the reliability objective of 1 day in 10 years • Flatter curve reduces price volatility when supply is tight (near or below NICR) • Reduces the incentives for exercising market power for both buyer and seller • A straight curve without a kink simplifies the curve’s development (and updates). • Is within a reasonable price cap range of 1.5 – 2.25 x Net CONE (suggested by Brattle) • A price cap of 2.0x Net CONE is not in line with other capacity markets in the region that are using a demand curve. A price cap of 1.5x Net CONE is in line with the other capacity markets in the region.

  6. APPENDIX

  7. Curves for EvaluationNortheast Utilities Submitted Curve = NU-1

  8. Northeast Utilities Updated Curve = NU-2

  9. Northeast Utilities Updated Curve = NU-31.5x Cap, Right-Shifted Toe, Tuned to 1-in-10