1 / 26

What have we ‘Bin’ up to at the ANU John Sullivan Recycling & Sustainable Systems Manager

What have we ‘Bin’ up to at the ANU John Sullivan Recycling & Sustainable Systems Manager Facilities and Services / Energy and Conservation Office. Where we are. Located in the suburb of Acton, within the ACT Foot print of 150 hectares 15500 staff and students

fagan
Télécharger la présentation

What have we ‘Bin’ up to at the ANU John Sullivan Recycling & Sustainable Systems Manager

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What have we ‘Bin’ up to at the ANU John Sullivan Recycling & Sustainable Systems Manager Facilities and Services / Energy and Conservation Office

  2. Where we are • Located in the suburb of Acton, within the ACT • Foot print of 150 hectares • 15500 staff and students • Spends in excess of $250,000 pa for waste management

  3. Environmental Management Plan • EMP launched in 1998 • 8 Key target areas • Waste KPI – 70% reduction of waste to landfill (based on 2002 figures ) by 2008

  4. Key Points Introduction of the recycling Infrastructure comprised of three main areas: • Building Waste • Public Stations • Other recycling activities

  5. Development of a Recycling Infrastructure • Investigation of existing services and systems. • Discussions with end users to determine their acceptance of the ideology

  6. Development of a recycling Infrastructure • Determine the range of services required to suit the users needs • Development of standardised and flexible signage

  7. Development of a Recycling Infrastructure • Maximise the potential of existing systems by use of effective signage

  8. Development of the public stations • Aim – enable recycling within the public/ landscape areas on campus

  9. Development of public stations • Aim – simple construction • Standard components

  10. Introduction of the recycling Infrastructure • Replacement of existing field bins • Raise the level of public awareness of ANUgreen

  11. Event Waste Management • 2 or 4 Bin Station • Temporary units

  12. Introduction of the recycling infrastructure • Ability to blend with existing architecture

  13. Service providers • A requirement to provide a level of personal service beyond that normally offered by the larger organisations.

  14. Service Providers • Flexibility of independent service providers to meet the needs of the client.

  15. Development of Waste Audit Methodology • Audit required to evaluate the success of the public stations • To gain a better understanding of the waste stream composition

  16. Development of links with external groups • Interhall working group • Approximately 2500 students on campus

  17. Development of links with external groups • Green Corps team undertaking audit

  18. Development of links with external groups • Environmental accounting Class • 17 groups • Carry out audits over a 4 week period

  19. Waste audit sheet

  20. Waste audit results • Actual recycling bins performed well • Waste bins still contained a large percentage recyclable material • Provided good feedback for areas on performance

  21. IT Recycling • Amnesty period for 2003 to encourage the clearing of redundant IT equipment • ANU turnover of 1500 machines per anum • Over 1800 machines collected

  22. Fluorescent tube Recycling • Each 4’ tube can contain around 30 milligrams of mercury, which in turn has the capacity to pollute 30,000 litres of water • 600 kilograms of tubes recycled in 2003

  23. Steel Recycling • 37.7 tonnes collected in 2003 • Cost saving of around $4000 • Each tonne of steel recycled saves - up to 75% of the energy required to make steel from virgin materials

  24. Furniture Recycling • Over 450 items recycled in 2003 • Opportunity for ANU to interact with Charity groups

  25. Communication • “Back of the loo” program • Information to a captive audience

  26. Conclusion • If you cant measure it you can’t manage it. • Education of staff is an essential component • Systems must be flexible to allow for change

More Related