1 / 14

Gili Rechany M.A., BCBA Chanie Kessler M.A. Chanie Stolik M.A. Shema Kolainu – Hear Our Voices

The Effects of Peer Tutoring training on Increased Socialization in Free play settings with Children presenting with autism Spectrum Disorders. Gili Rechany M.A., BCBA Chanie Kessler M.A. Chanie Stolik M.A. Shema Kolainu – Hear Our Voices. Abstract.

fallon
Télécharger la présentation

Gili Rechany M.A., BCBA Chanie Kessler M.A. Chanie Stolik M.A. Shema Kolainu – Hear Our Voices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Effects of Peer Tutoring training on Increased Socialization in Free play settings with Children presenting with autism Spectrum Disorders Gili Rechany M.A., BCBA Chanie Kessler M.A. Chanie Stolik M.A. Shema Kolainu – Hear Our Voices

  2. Abstract • The current investigation focuses on conditioning peers as reinforcers through peer tutoring training. • four preschool students and two school age students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) participated in the study. • Reinforcement schedules were monitored by the trainer and implemented by the tutor while trials of already mastered targets were presented to the tutee. • The effects of peertutoring on increased socialization in free play settings for both the tutor and the tutee were measured once criteria was met on reinforcement delivery in peer tutoring sessions. Free powerpoint template: www.brainybetty.com

  3. Method: Participants • Participants • Four preschool boys and two school age boys diagnosed with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) participated in this study. • The students were chosen because they do not initiate play independently with their peers, but they do parallel play with similar toys. • The participants were selected based on teacher’s analysis that the prerequisites of appropriate play with numerous toys were mastered independently. In addition, similar levels of verbal behaviors were identified with both participants. Free powerpoint template: www.brainybetty.com

  4. Method: Setting • Setting • Shema Kolainu- Hear Our Voices • All sessions were conducted in the participants’ classroom. • The students are in a self-contained class for students with an Autism Spectrum Disorder. • The classroom contained four additional children, one teacher and three teaching assistants. Free powerpoint template: www.brainybetty.com

  5. Method: Materials • Materials • Teacher made stimulus were used to make the multiple exemplar programs used for tutoring sessions. • Blocks and Lego • Data forms were used to record the number of reinforcements delivered by the tutor. • A mechanical clicker was used to collect data during play area observations. • A timer was used for observation sessions. Free powerpoint template: www.brainybetty.com

  6. Experimental Design • Data Collection • Independent variable: Peer Tutoring • Dependent variable: Socialization in Free play settings • Interobserver Agreement • Interobserver agreement was calculated by the number of agreements divided by the number of disagreements times 100. (63% of all baseline and training sessions) • Design • A multiple baseline design across participants was used to show the relationship between the independence and the dependent variable. Free powerpoint template: www.brainybetty.com

  7. Procedures • Baseline. The number of social interactions made across five, five minute observations between the two pairs of peers selected. • Social Interactions included • Initiations- the student initiating contact by exchanging a toy or by emitting a vocal antecedents. • Reciprocation- the student responds to a peer’s initiation by engaging in the identified task • Name ID- name calling while sitting in the play area Free powerpoint template: www.brainybetty.com

  8. Training Procedures • Peer Tutoring training. Prompt fading was used to teach the tutor to deliver reinforcement to the tutee on an FR1 schedule. Already mastered targets were presented to the tutee by the tutor and immediately following each behavior the tutor would deliver a reinforcer to the student. • Phase I included a full physical prompt to the tutor by the observer. • Phase II included a partial physical prompt paired with a verbal prompt. • Phase III include only a verbal prompt presented by the observer. • Phase IV included independent delivery of reinforcement on FR1 schedule. • Criteria were set at 90% times two consecutive sessions for all phases. All sessions include 20 trials presented by the tutor. Free powerpoint template: www.brainybetty.com

  9. Return to Baseline • Return to baseline. The number of social initiation made across five, five minute observations between the three pairs of peers selected. • Social Interactions included • Initiations- the student initiating contact by exchanging a toy or addressing the other student with vocal antecedents. • Reciprocation- the student responds to a peer’s initiation by engaging in the identified task • Name ID- name calling while sitting in the play area Free powerpoint template: www.brainybetty.com

  10. Tutor A and Tutee A Free powerpoint template: www.brainybetty.com

  11. Tutor B and Tutee B Free powerpoint template: www.brainybetty.com

  12. Tutor C and Tutee C Free powerpoint template: www.brainybetty.com

  13. Discussion • Teacher Observations • The tutor and the tutee engaged in appropriate social communication through the day. • The tutee tacted the tutors behavior repeatedly throughout the day. • Increased eye contact during group activities and Gym time was noted. • Future Interventions • Peer programs with social board games • Turn taking activities • Peer Modeling • Observational Learning Free powerpoint template: www.brainybetty.com

  14. References • Gumpel, T.P. & Frank, R. (1999). An expansion of the peer-tutoring paradigm: Cross-age peer tutoring of social skills among socially rejected boys. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 115-118. • Kamps, D. M., Barbetta, P. M., Leonard, B. R., & Delquadri, J. (1994). Class wide peer tutoring: An integration strategy to improve reading skills and promote peer interactions among students with autism and general education peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 49-61. • Odom, S. L., Chandler, L. K., Ostrosky, M., McConnell, S. R., & Reaney, S. (1992). Fading teacher prompts from peer-initiation interventions for young children with disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 307-317. • Stewart, G., Van Houten, R., & Van Houten, J. (1992). Increasing generalized social interactions in psychotic and mentally retarded residents through peer-mediated therapy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 335-339. Free powerpoint template: www.brainybetty.com

More Related