1 / 12

Back Again……

Back Again……. Westdrewten 2013. to…. All of the CWS Staff With special thanks to Carol Peters and Dan Cook-Huffman Wonderful students Nancy Vooys Joel Rhodes And now alumni Nick Talisman Alden Hiller Catie Stroup Rudi Carter Courtney DeGemmis Brooke Luke Paige Stott.

gary-boyer
Télécharger la présentation

Back Again……

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Back Again…… Westdrewten 2013

  2. to….. All of the CWS Staff With special thanks to Carol Peters and Dan Cook-Huffman Wonderful students Nancy Vooys Joel Rhodes And now alumni Nick Talisman Alden Hiller CatieStroup Rudi Carter Courtney DeGemmis Brooke Luke Paige Stott

  3. The questions Broadly ... • How do institutional policies shape attendance at cultural events? • How does attendance at cultural events on campus impact students?

  4. What we have. . . Also have GPA and retention data for each semester

  5. Attendance at Events

  6. Currently…. Connecting • Is there a relationship between • Social Identity (across time) • Openness to Experience AND • Number of events attended (across time)

  7. And…. Coding Student Event Critiques • Reviewed 763 reaction papers from 206 students • Initial Review of essays coded for: • Expectations about the event • Prior knowledge, experience or familiarity with event/type of event • Specific connection with event itself • Overall Assessment of the event • Judgment about how the event reflected on campus college community • Judgment about the impact upon the person who attended themself

  8. Rates of Reported Impact Inter-Rater Reliability Kappa = 0.768 (Substantial Agreement (Landis & Koch, 1977))

  9. Frequency of Impact Categories

  10. What’s newCoding Impact: Part 2 Type of Impact • Attitude • Knowledge • Behavior

  11. Frequency of Impact Categories* *Preliminary Data Inter-rater Reliability Kappa= .768

  12. Next? • Self-selection bias/Communication issues/Timing issues? • Other measures of impact we have missed? • Anything else we should be worried about?

More Related