1 / 12

Noise Cuts and Thresholds

Noise Cuts and Thresholds. a zero event analysis. Noise cut tests. Investigation of background rates As a function of noise cuts Lowest threshold values Results also available in elog https://atlasop.cern.ch/elog/ATLAS/ATLAS/64717 Based on short investigation on 7 th December

gay-holt
Télécharger la présentation

Noise Cuts and Thresholds

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Noise Cuts and Thresholds a zero event analysis L1Calo Joint Meeting 11th-13th January 2010

  2. Noise cut tests • Investigation of background rates • As a function of noise cuts • Lowest threshold values • Results also available in elog • https://atlasop.cern.ch/elog/ATLAS/ATLAS/64717 • Based on short investigation on 7th December • Stable and quiet calorimeter conditions • This talk addresses only non-beam backgrounds • No comment on physics rates and backgrounds L1Calo Joint Meeting 11th-13th January 2010

  3. Introduction to noise cuts • Reduce number of 1 GeV pulses • Both real and due to noise • Keep background rates under better control • Especially for Jet triggers • Soften and shift threshold turn-on • Especially for Jet triggers • Caused much trigger menu debate last year • Debate is likely to continue! • Current default noise cut is ‘4’ L1Calo Joint Meeting 11th-13th January 2010

  4. What does noise cut 4 mean? • Noise cut is applied after Finite Impulse Filter (FIR) sum • FIR sum is an integer value • Zero level dependent on pedestal • Resolution varies, but typically 0.25-0.3 MeV • Taking a typical value of 0.28 MeV and effective pedestal 40 L1Calo Joint Meeting 11th-13th January 2010

  5. Tower Occupancy with no noise cut Remember: 1 % = 400 kHz • The 1 GeV occupancy of towers is very sensitive • Tower RMS (typically 250-400 MeV) • Effective pedestal: 40, 40.1, 40.2, etc • Very approximate example from toy MC: • RMS: 300 MeV • Ped 39.5: 0 % • Ped 40: 0.01 % • Ped 40.5: 0.1 % • RMS 400 MeV • Ped 39.5: 0.01% • Ped 40: 0.1 % • Ped 40.5: 2 % L1Calo Joint Meeting 11th-13th January 2010

  6. Also we do have cosmics • Cosmics rates for lowest thresholds well established • Some bad tower noise contribution, but mostly real • With standard noise cut 4: • J5: 5.0 Hz J10: 2.0 Hz • TAU5: 4.0 Hz TAU6: 3.0 Hz • EM3: 0.3 Hz • FJ3: 0.0 Hz L1Calo Joint Meeting 11th-13th January 2010

  7. Variation of noise cuts J10_win6 rate 200 Hz NB currently overestimating energy here • Essentially only 2 extra settings to try • 2 and 3 • However, 3 had noise contribution from one tower • Alternative 3* configuration • ‘Bad’ tower at 4, others at 3 L1Calo Joint Meeting 11th-13th January 2010

  8. Thoughts on noise cuts • Jet rate is the one that needs most care • But J5 is certainly not intended as a standalone trigger! • J10 also tipping over the edge (win6 is ‘better’) • Noise cut 3 looks feasible on a short timescale • When? (Requires coordination with menu group) • EM and Tau items are very insensitive • This is expected, but reassuring • For example, to generate extra false EM3 triggers, need • A tower which hits 3 GeV, but not 4 GeV, regularly • A nearby tower with noise hit of 1 GeV • EM towers are on the lower end of RMS spectrum L1Calo Joint Meeting 11th-13th January 2010

  9. Bonus for five • Noise investigation was very quick • So decided to look at thresholds • But note kept noise cut at 4 for these tests • EM2, TAU4 and maybe even J4 look feasible • But be careful of Jet triggers and noise cuts • FJ behaviour is amazing L1Calo Joint Meeting 11th-13th January 2010

  10. Here’s one I prepared earlier... • One of Alan’s first comments was ‘what about Missing Et’ • I can’t answer that, but on SumEt • eloghttps://atlasop.cern.ch/elog/ATLAS/ATLAS/53404 • Noise/cosmic rate test performed 23rd October • Before significant progress on energy calibration • TE thresholds: • 50 GeV: 0.2 Hz • 25 GeV: 0.5 Hz • 15 GeV: 1.0 Hz • 10 GeV: 2.0 Hz • 8 GeV: 8.0 Hz • Current lowest TE threshold is 150 GeV • Beam rate of this item is essentially 0 • We believe there’s some scope to reduce this • To put it mildly... L1Calo Joint Meeting 11th-13th January 2010

  11. Conclusions • Noise cuts will continue to be an issue • Some change sooner may be better than later • I’m still sceptical of going to 2 in the near future • Does it actually require a Level-1 threshold change? • Scope to reduce thresholds • From a pure noise/cosmics perspective • Not clear there’s a physics case for TAU, J or FJ • In fact FJ3 is possibly already too low for physics purpose • However there is a clear physics case for EM2 • Also the TE, JE thresholds seem to high to be useful L1Calo Joint Meeting 11th-13th January 2010

  12. Backup (thanks to Andrew) 2EM3 2EM2 L1Calo Joint Meeting 11th-13th January 2010

More Related