1 / 19

Frequency Response and Filter Design By Poles and Zeros Positioning

Frequency Response and Filter Design By Poles and Zeros Positioning. Dr. Mohamed Bingabr University of Central Oklahoma Slides For Lathi’s Textbook Provided by Dr. P. Cheung. Frequency Response of a LTI System.

gay-mcintyre
Télécharger la présentation

Frequency Response and Filter Design By Poles and Zeros Positioning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Frequency Response and Filter Design By Poles and Zeros Positioning Dr. Mohamed Bingabr University of Central Oklahoma Slides For Lathi’s Textbook Provided by Dr. P. Cheung

  2. Frequency Response of a LTI System • We have seen that LTI system response to x(t)=est is H(s)est. We represent such input-output pair as: • Instead of using a complex frequency, let us set s = j, this yields: • It is often better to express H(j) in polar form: • Therefore Frequency Response Phase Response Amplitude Response

  3. h(t) = 3e-5t |H(s)|

  4. Frequency Response Example (1) • Find the frequency response of a system with transfer function: • Then find the system response y(t) for input x(t)=cos2t and x(t)=cos(10t-50) • Substitute s=j

  5. Frequency Response Example (2)

  6. Frequency Response Example (3) • For input x(t)=cos2t, we have: • Therefore

  7. Frequency Response Example (4) • For input x(t)=cos(10t-50), we will use the amplitude and phase response curves directly: • Therefore

  8. Frequency Response of delay of T sec • H(s) of an ideal T sec delay is: • Therefore • That is, delaying a signal by T has no effect on its amplitude. • It results in a linear phase shift (with frequency), and a gradient of –T. • The quantity: • is known as Group Delay.

  9. Frequency Response of an ideal differentiator • H(s) of an ideal differentiator is: • Therefore • This agrees with: • That’s why differentiator is not a nice component to work with – it amplifies high frequency component (i.e. noise!).

  10. Frequency Response of an ideal integrator • H(s) of an ideal integrator is: • Therefore • This agrees with: • That’s why integrator is a nice component to work with – it suppresses high frequency component (i.e. noise!).

  11. Filter Design By Poles and Zeros Positioning

  12. Effects of Poles & Zeros on Frequency Response (1) • Consider a general system transfer function: • The value of the transfer function at some complex frequency s = p is:

  13. Effects of Poles & Zeros on Frequency Response (2) • Therefore the magnitude and phase at s = p are given by:

  14. Effects of Poles & Zeros on Frequency Response (3) • Frequency Response of a system is obtained by evaluating H(s) along the y-axis (i.e. taking all value of s=j). • Consider the effect of two complex system poles on the frequency response. Near to a pole ENHANCES amplitude

  15. Effects of Poles & Zeros on Frequency Response (4) • Consider the effect of two complex system zeros on the frequency response. Near to a zero SUPPRESSES amplitude

  16. Poles & Low-pass Filters • Use the enhancement and suppression properties of poles & zeros to design filters. • Low-pass filter (LPF) has maximum gain at =0, and the gain decreases with . • Simplest LPF has a single pole on real axis, say at (s=-c). Then • To have a “brickwall” type of LPF (i.e. very sharp cut-off), we need a WALL OF POLE as shown, the more poles we get, the sharper the cut-off. jc x x N = 2 x x x x x x 0 Re x x x x x -jc x ChebyshevFilter Butterworth Filter

  17. Poles & Band-pass Filter • Band-pass filter has gain enhanced over the entire passband, but suppressed elsewhere. • For a passband centred around 0, we need lots of poles opposite the imaginary axis in front of the passband centre at 0.

  18. Notch Filter • Notch filter could in theory be realised with two zeros placed at ±j0. However, such a filter would not have unity gain at zero frequency, and the notch will not be sharp. • To obtain a good notch filter, put two poles close to the two zeros on the semicircle as shown. Since both pole/zero pair are equal-distance to the origin, the gain at zero frequency is exactly one. Same for =±.

  19. Notch Filter Example • Design a second-order notch filter to suppress 60 Hz hum in a radio receiver. • Make 0 =120. Place zeros are at s = ±j0 , and poles at - 0 cos ± j0 sin. • We get: HW7_Ch4: 4.8-1(a,b), 4.8-2 (a,b,d), 4.10-1, 4.10-3, 4.10-5, 4.10-8, 4.10-9

More Related