280 likes | 419 Vues
Effects of Vigor on Psychological Well-Being. Ekaterina Solovieva York University Toronto, Canada. Co-authors. I would like to gratefully acknowledge my co-authors: Esther Greenglass Lynda Cheng Noelia Vasquez Thanks to Lisa Fiksenbaum for statistical assistance. Introduction.
E N D
Effects of Vigor on Psychological Well-Being Ekaterina Solovieva York University Toronto, Canada
Co-authors I would like to gratefully acknowledge my co-authors: • Esther Greenglass • Lynda Cheng • Noelia Vasquez Thanks to Lisa Fiksenbaum for statistical assistance.
Introduction • Well-established relationship between social support and psychological well-being outcomes • Positively related to life satisfaction • Negatively related to loneliness, anxiety and depression (e.g., Tao, Dong, Pratt, Hunsberger, & Pancer, 2000)
Conceptually separated in the past Importance of drawing on others’ resources for coping Relational skills as coping strengths Coping & Social Support
planning and preventive strategies identification and utilization of social resources utilization of proactive emotional coping Proactive Coping (Greenglass, Schwarzer, & Taubert, 1999)
Resources: Internal Self-Efficacy Optimism Resources: External Social Support Theoretical Model: Resources, Proactive Coping & Outcomes Outcomes:Positive Vigor Life Satisfaction Proactive Coping Outcomes: Negative Depression Burnout Anger
Current Research • Transition to university – great research opportunity • Function of proactive coping and vigor in psychological well-being, especially negative outcomes (such as depression)?
Purpose of Current Study • To investigate the effects of social support, coping and vigor on psychological well-being in university students as reflected in the depression levels
Social Support • Focused on informational support • Measured using a 6-item questionnaire (Caplan et al., 1975)
Social Support (cont’d) • Sample item: “How much can people be relied on to provide you with assistance with your academic work when you need it most?” • 4-point scale from (1) Not at all to (4) Very much • Alpha in this study = .91
Proactive Coping • Strategies to build up general resources that facilitate the achievement of challenging goals (Greenglass et al., 1999) • 14 items • Sample item: • “When I experience a problem, I take the initiative in resolving it”
Proactive Coping (cont’d) • 4-point scale from (1) Not at all true to (4) Completely true • Alpha in this study = .82
Vigor • … characterized by high levels of energy, mental resilience, stamina, and persistence when problems arise. A person with high degree of vigor is lively, active, energetic, cheerful and alert. (Greenglass, 2006)
Vigor (cont’d) • Measured using 6-item vigor-activity subscale of The Profile of Mood States (POMS; McNair, Lorr, & Droppleman, 1971). • Sample item: “How much have you been feeling energetic during the past week, including today?”
Vigor (cont’d) • 5-point scale from (1) Not at all to (5) Extremely • Alpha in this study = .88
Depression • Measured using Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL; Derogatis et al, 1974) • 11 items • Sample item: “Crying easily”
Depression • 4-point scale from (1) Never to (4) Extremely often • Alpha in this study =.81
Procedure • First-year psychology students filled out an online questionnaire twice for URPP credit: • In the beginning of the semester (Sept-Oct) • Just prior to exam time (Nov-Dec) • The participants were anonymous. A self-generated number was used to match responses from time 1 and time 2.
Participants • N=68, 81% female • Average age: 18.65 years, SD=2.41 • All are first year students
Social Support Proactive Coping Vigor Depression (time 2) Theoretical Model • Relationship between social support, proactive coping and vigor at time 1 and depression at time 2. Time 1
.34** .42*** Social Support Proactive Coping Vigor -.32** Depression (time 2) Empirical Model • Relationship between social support, proactive coping and vigor at time 1 and depression at time 2. Time 1 2 (3) = 3.792 p=.285 GFI = .973 AGFI = .911 CFI = .970 RMSEA = .063
Empirical Model Relating Proactive Coping, Social Support, Vigor and 2MW in Joint Arthroplasty Patients Time 1 Time 2 .25** .20* .34*** Social Support Proactive Coping Vigor 2MW 2(3)= 3.350 p=0.341 GFI= 0.989 AGFI= 0.965 CFI= 0.989 RMSEA=0.027
Conclusions • Proactive coping mediated the effects of social support on vigor • Vigor mediated the effects of proactive coping on depression • High levels of vigor were associated with lower levels of depression
All self report measures in this study Behavioral measures of depression? Behavioral measures of vigor? Limitations
Possible Interventions • How can we assist first-year students as they transition to university? • Higher vigor is associated with lower depression • Can vigor be manipulated?
Cultivate social networks Develop programs to teach proactive coping that emphasizes taking control before disaster strikes Possible Interventions (cont’d)