1 / 43

The New Water Use Requirements

The New Water Use Requirements. January , 2007 Lyndon Kelley- MSU Extension Water Quality Agent. Why is water use an issue?. Historic water use issues – Great Lakes Diversion – addressed by Annex 2001 We need to be stewards of our own resources.

grant-fernandez
Télécharger la présentation

The New Water Use Requirements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The New Water Use Requirements January , 2007 Lyndon Kelley- MSU Extension Water Quality Agent

  2. Why is water use an issue? • Historic water use issues – Great Lakes Diversion – addressed by Annex 2001 • We need to be stewards of our own resources. • Michigan was the only state in the Great Lakes region without a water use permitting system. • Recent court cases • Nestle case • Water use conflicts

  3. Annex 2001 • States and provinces will manage their own in-basin withdrawals • Basin-wide, resource-based standard • flexible application  • Each jurisdiction will commit to establishing a program, including thresholds, to manage or regulate new or increased withdrawals consistent with the standard.

  4. New packet of Water Use Regulation for Michigan • P.A 148 - Water Use Reporting - 2004 • P.A. 177 – Water use conflict resolution - 2004 P.A. 33-36 of February 2006 • Large Quantity withdraw requirements and meeting Great Lakes Annex expectations.

  5. PA 177 Act 177 allows owner of a “small quantity well” to file a complaint with MDEQ (or MDA) if well: • Fails to furnish normal water supply • Fails to provide potable water Complainant must have a credible reason to believe that the problem is caused by a HIGH CAPACITY WELL

  6. Groundwater Mapping on the Web: • http://gwmap.rsgis.msu.edu/viewer.htm • Look right, click on groundwater inventory • Geology • Location and Yield of Aquifers • Glacial Yield • This provides an overview of the potential yield for aquifers in various areas of the state. Much of the most heavily irrigated areas are located in zones that can provide adequate resources.

  7. Water use Reporting New Requirements -PA 33 -34 • Require permits for new uses over 2 million gallons per day. • Sets a performance standard for Large scale water users. ( > 70 gallon / minute ) • Where Agriculture fits: > 100,000 gal. a day< 2 million gal. per day. Need to register and report , no permit required

  8. Permit Threshold - 2 mg/d 30 day average, Common distribution system 100,000 gal./day = 70 gal./min. capacity 1 million gal./day = 700 gal./min. capacity 2 million gal./day = 1400 gal./min. capacity 1400 gal./min. capacity at 50% use = 700 gal./min. capacity

  9. Water Use Reporting- PA 148 • All water withdrawals with over 100,000 gallon/ day capacity (70 gallons / minute) • One or more well combined capacity on same or adjacent property of same owner/operator. • Much the same format as 2004 and 2005 report . • Addition of GPS location of Groundwater withdrawal. (latitude / longitude) within 25’ • One time option to establish a baseline capacity

  10. Agriculture water use reporting to MDA only • The rarely used option of reporting to MDEQ was removed in P.A. 33 leaving Michigan Department of Agriculture as the only reporting option for agricultural producers. • There is No Charge for Agriculture water use reporting, a $200 annual saving over other sectors.

  11. Static water level • Reporting of static water level is no longer required • Static water level reporting was moved from a requirement to report to a statement of when available. • Static water level records are still a very effective method of monitoring well performance.

  12. Water Use Reporting- location of Groundwater withdrawal. (latitude / longitude) • GPS location of Groundwater withdrawal. within 25’ (latitude / longitude to 6 significant figures) Example. latitude 42.1306 , longitude -85.4701 • -GPS location of withdrawal will allow mapping and analysis of effect on groundwater and stream flow • Most hand held GPS unit can provide this information • latitude and longitude maybe found for any location identified on aerial map from: gwmap.rsgis.msu.edu • Well logs contain latitude and longitude information

  13. Water Use Reporting- location of Groundwater withdrawal. (latitude / longitude) gwmap.rsgis.msu.edu latitude 42.1306 , longitude -85.4701

  14. Water Use Reporting- location of Groundwater withdrawal. (latitude / longitude) gwmap.rsgis.msu.edu

  15. Water Use Reporting- 2006 • 2006 Water Use reporting forms differ from previous years. Avoid old forms.. • Forms maybe acquired from the internet at: http://www.michigan.gov/mda/0,1607,7-125-1567_1599_29980---,00.html • Forms and useful information on the method of estimating water use are available at: http://web1.msue.msu.edu/stjoseph/anr/irrigat.htm • Many MSU Extension offices and USDA service center will have form a

  16. Baseline Capacity – 2006 one time opportunity • “Baseline Capacity” - Rated capacity of the system as of February 28, 2006, reported as pump capacity in gal/min. • Water withdrawal prior to February 2006 are granted a reputable presumption of no "adverse resource impact.”

  17. Baseline Capacity – do not miss this one !!! Increasing a water withdrawal by more than 70 gal./ min. beyond the baseline, constitutes a new water withdrawal, loosing the reputable presumption of no "adverse resource impact” If no “Baseline Capacity” volume is record in 2006, your 2004-2005 records will be used to determine a baseline. Most farmers rated pump capacity is far greater than their water use in 2004 or 2005.

  18. Trout streams

  19. PA 33 • Prohibit a person from making a large quantity withdrawal that caused an adverse resource impact to a designated trout stream; • Prescribe a maximum civil fine of $5,000 per day for a knowing violation this Section - Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act (NREPA) has always had a standard of no adverse resource impact to a water body but the use of this as a standard for water withdraw is new.

  20. PA 33 - 34 Trout Stream protection (through Feb. 2008) • Require either • Permit for new wells located within 1320 ft of designated trout stream Or • Placement of wells 150ft deep (top of screen) And / Or • Proof that flow will not be drawn below 50% of the 5 year seasonal low flow

  21. Two-year “Trout Stream Rule” • SEC. 32722 • UNTIL A WATER WITHDRAWAL ASSESSMENT TOOL BECOMES EFFECTIVE UPON LEGISLATIVE ENACTMENT PURSUANT TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL UNDER SECTION 32803, THERE IS A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION THAT A NEW OR INCREASED LARGE QUANTITY WITHDRAWAL WILL NOT CAUSE AN ADVERSE RESOURCE IMPACT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 32721 UNDER EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES: • (A) THE LOCATION OF THE WITHDRAWAL IS MORE THAN 1,320 FEET FROM THE BANKS OF A DESIGNATED TROUT STREAM. • (B) THE WITHDRAWAL DEPTH OF THE WELL IS AT LEAST 150 ft. • (2) A PRESUMPTION UNDER SUBSECTION (1) MAY BE REBUTTED BY A PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE THAT A NEW OR INCREASED LARGE QUANTITY WITHDRAWAL FROM THE WATERS OF THE STATE HAS CAUSED OR IS LIKELY TO CAUSE AN ADVERSE RESOURCE IMPACT.

  22. PA 33-35 • Trout Stream protection • http://www.michigan.gov/documents/FisheriesOrders_136765_7.htm#FO210 Mill Creek upstream from impoundment (T7S, R12W, S32)            to Preston Road (T7S, R12W, S7) St. Joseph        Curtis Creek (T7S, R12W, S7)St. Joseph       Sherman Mills Creek (T7S, R10W, S28)St. Joseph       Spring Creek (T6S, R10W, S19) mainstream to M‑66  St. Joseph       Unnamed Tributary to Spring Creek (T6S, R10W, S16) St. Joseph       Unnamed Tributary (T6S, R10W, S26) St. Joseph       Prairie River (T7S, R9W, S8) MacKale Road upstream to County Line (Mainstream only) St. Joseph        Flowerfield Creek Mainstream only (T5S, R12W, S13) St. Joseph, Kalamazoo       Sheldon Creek (T5S, R13W, S24)  Cass       Creamery Creek (T5S, R13W, S23)  Cass       Little Swan Creek (T6S, R9W, S22)St. Joseph

  23. Groundwater Dependent Resources from MNFI gwmap.rsgis.msu.edu

  24. Groundwater Dependent Resources from MNFI gwmap.rsgis.msu.edu

  25. PA 33 • Beginning two years after the bill took effect, prohibit a person from making a large quantity withdrawal that caused any adverse resource impact. • Prescribe a maximum civil fine of $5,000 per day for a knowing violation this Section

  26. What is an adverse resource impact. A Holistic system of defining adverse resource impact that is being discussed is fish species habitats • Each water body has a designated fish species • User can not lower the flow lower than predicted minimum flow for habitat for fish resource stream is designated for.

  27. What do you need to do a new large capacity withdraw ? • Few Agricultural user will need a permit. ( 2 million gal/ day, common distribution system, 90 day average) • Through March of 2008 you need to aware of the trout stream provision if near one. • All large capacity user need to meet thenoadverse resource impact clause for well constructed after February 2006.

  28. What is withdrawal that caused an adverse resource impact. • Base flow – low flow period for a stream creek or river • all water coming from the ground water recharge rather than surface flow • early August most years for most streams

  29. PA33 Existing uses gain standing • Establish a rebuttable presumption that a new or increased large quantity withdrawal meeting specified criteria would not cause an adverse resource impact, until the enactment of a water withdrawal assessment tool .

  30. PA 33 • Allow a person who intended to make a new or increased large quantity withdrawal for which a permit was not required to petition the DEQ for a determination that the withdrawal would not cause an adverse resource impact; and prescribe a $5,000 petition fee.

  31. PA 33 • Prohibit a local unit of government from enacting or enforcing an ordinance that regulated an adverse resource impact caused by a large quantity withdrawal.

  32. PA 34 • Transfer the Groundwater Conservation Advisory Council from the DEQ to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). • Require the appointment of additional members to the Council to assist it in carrying out the additional duties. • Adds a technical advisory committee of individuals with specific technical and legal expertise relevant to the Council’s responsibilities.

  33. PA 34 • Require the Council and DEQ, the DNR, the MDA, and the technical advisory committee to design a water withdrawal assessment tool to be used by a person proposing a new or increased large quantity withdrawal, to assist in determining whether the withdrawal would cause an adverse resource impact.

  34. PA 37 • Encourage large-quantity users in a watershed to form a water users committee through which the DEQ could facilitate the resolution of a situation in which a withdrawal caused an adverse resource impact.

  35. PA 33 - 36 House added amendments • increasing non-agricultural fee to $200 • excludes high capacity well with small annual use from reporting requirements ( less than 1.5 million gallon / year ) - high capacity well will register with explanation of capacity to pump > 70 gal./ min but withdraw < 1.5 million gallon in a 90 day period.

  36. Do you have a 70 gallon/minute withdraw that you do not have to report use annually ( less than 1.5 million gallon / year ) Excludes withdraw used for fire suppression. Less than 1.5 million gallon / year withdraw 1.5 million gallon = • 238 cows using 70 gallons / day over 90 days • 333 beef steer consuming 50 gallons / animal / day over 90 days • Withdraw of 70 gallons / minute for 15 contuse days of 90 day

  37. Groundwater Conservation Advisory Council – Act 148 • Study sustainability of Michigan’s groundwater use • Should state provide additional oversight of groundwater withdrawals? • Monitor Annex 2001 • Study implementation of Act 177 • Groundwater dispute resolution

  38. Groundwater Conservation Advisory Council • Conservation means that to meet the needs of existing and future users and to ensure that habitats and ecosystems are protected, the use of the State’s water must be done in a sustainable and renewable manner. Sound water-resource management emphasizes careful and informed use of water, which is essential to meet these objectives.

  39. Groundwater Conservation Advisory Council • Sustainable use of Michigan’s groundwater resources means: • meeting the needs of the present while not compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. • recognizing that sustainable use encompasses environmental, economic, and social systems and their contribution to meeting human needs.

More Related